SavedAdd your journal

Journals / International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research / 2017 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 4

Sociology in cinema: Origins of social types in Turkish cinema

Çiçek COŞKUN
Pages
1147–1154
Publication Date
2017-10-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Finally, we will examine origins of social types in Turkish cinema.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:There is a strong relationship between the social type concept in sociology and cinema.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Aim of this study is to examine the relationship between the social type concept in sociology and origins of social types in classically narrated Turkish films.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Finally, we will examine origins of social types in Turkish cinema.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:social types · Turkish cinema · cinema

Abstract

There is a strong relationship between the social type concept in sociology and cinema. We can see representations of various social types in cinema films. Aim of this study is to examine the relationship between the social type concept in sociology and origins of social types in classically narrated Turkish films. After a general introduction, social type concept in sociology will be discussed first. Second, classical narrative structure will be examined. Then, we will examine character and type in cinema films. Finally, we will examine origins of social types in Turkish cinema.

🔖

Cite This Article

COŞKUN, Ç. (2017). Sociology in cinema: Origins of social types in Turkish cinema. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 4, 1147–1154. https://ajindex.com/articles/414789

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Abisel, N. (1995). Popüler Sinema ve Türler. İstanbul:
  2. Alan Yayıncılık And, M. (2010). Karagöz. Ed. D. Çevik. Trans. T. Kaan. Ankara: Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı Yayınları.
  3. Almog, O.(1998) The Problem of Social Type: A Review. Electronic Journal of Sociology. https://www.sociology.org/content/vol003.004/almog.html#26b
  4. Aristotle. (1997). Poetics. New York: Dover Publications. Baker, U. (2002) From Opinion to Images. PhD Thesis.Middle East Technical University. Balázs, B. (1952) Theory of the Film: Character and Growth of a New Art. Trans. Edith Bone. London: Dennis Dobson Ltd. Barthes, R. (1974). S/Z. Trans. Richard Miller. New York: Hill and Wang. Bartle, R. (1996).
  5. Heats, Clubs, Diamonds, Spades: Players Who Suit Muds. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/247190693_Hearts_clubs_diamonds_spades_Players_who_suit_MUDs
  6. Booth, B., Blair, M. (1989) Thesaurus of Sociological Indexing Terms. San Diego, CA: Sociological Abstracts Inc. Bordwell, D., Thompson, K., (1988). The Classical Hollywood Cinema: Film Style and Mode of Production to 1960. London: Routledge. Butler, J. Classical Narrative Structure: Exposition, Climax, Resolution. Critical Commons. Retrieved from http://www.criticalcommons.org/Members/jbutler/commentaries/ classical-narrative structure-exposition-climax-resolution. Campbell, J., Fletcher, G. & Greenhill, A. (2009). Conflict and Identity Shape Shifting in an Online Financial Community. Information Systems Journal 19 (5), 461–478.
  7. Chatman, S. B. (1978). Story and Discourse: Narrative Structure in Fiction and Film. New York: Cornell University Pres. Flitterman-Lewis, S. (1994). The Blossom and the Bole: Narrative and Visual Spectacle in Early Film Melodrama. Cinema Journal. 33 (3), 3-15 http://www.jstor.org/stable/1225585
  8. Giddens, A. (1990). The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  9. Glick, C.E. (1955). Social types in Race Relations. In A.W Lind. (Ed) Race Relations in World Perspective. Pp. 194-200. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  10. Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self In Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday. Lévi-Strauss, C. (1955). The Structural Study of Myth. The Journal of American Folklore. 68.27, 428-444.
  11. Mills, C. W. (1959). The Sociological Imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.
  12. Olivier, B. (2009). Extra Ordinary Cinema. South African Journal of Art History. 24(1), 20-33.
  13. Propp, V.I.A. (1969). Morphology of the Folk Tale. Texas: University of Texas Press.
  14. Schweinitz, J. (2006). Film and St