Journals / Laparoscopic Endoscopic Surgical Science / 2020 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 4

A safe method for trocar site bleeding; external cauterization under laparoscopic vision

Pages
270–273
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Hemostasis with cautery under laparoscopic vision provides a great advantage for the patient in terms of bleeding control, duration of surgery, and cost.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Trocar site bleeding is one of the unnoticeable complications of laparoscopic surgery that can lead to significant problems.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It has been demonstrated that trocar site bleeding is a preventable complication when appropriate methods are used.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Hemostasis with cautery under laparoscopic vision provides a great advantage for the patient in terms of bleeding control, duration of surgery, and cost.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Trocar site bleeding is one of the unnoticeable complications of laparoscopic surgery that can lead to significant problems. With this method, we believe that we can simply and effectively stop trocar site bleeding, and this method can be a standard application. In trocar site bleeding following laparoscopic surgery, the bleeding area is detected under laparoscopic vision. A standard cautery pen is passed into the skin to a sufficient extent. The cautery provides hemostasis in the bleeding area. It has been demonstrated that trocar site bleeding is a preventable complication when appropriate methods are used. In preventing trocar site bleeding, certain methods are being used currently such as laparoscopic sealing devices, hemostasis with open surgery, and hemostatic patches. Hemostasis with cautery in our method was demonstrated to have an equivalent effect as open hemostasis. Hemostasis with cautery under laparoscopic vision provides a great advantage for the patient in terms of bleeding control, duration of surgery, and cost.

🔖

Cite This Article

BINNETOGLU, K. (2020). A safe method for trocar site bleeding; external cauterization under laparoscopic vision. Laparoscopic Endoscopic Surgical Science, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 4, 270–273. https://ajindex.com/articles/413658

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Zucker KA, Flowers JL, Bailey RW, Graham SM, Buell J, Imbembo A. Laparoscopic Management of Acut Cholecystitis. Am J Surg 1993
  2. 508–14. [CrossRef] 2. Hoşcoşkun Z, Hatipoğlu AR, Ahsen M. Laparoskopik Kolesistektomide Ilk Deneyimlerimj z: (5 Vakanın değerlendirilmesi). End-Lap ve Minimal lnvazif Cerrahi 1995
  3. 175– 9. 3. Tarnay CM, Glass KB, Munro MG. Incision characteristics associated with six laparoscopic trocar-cannula systems: a randomized, observerblinded comparison. Obstet Gynecol 1999
  4. 89–93. [CrossRef] 4. Vazquez-Frias JA, Huete-Echandi F, Cueto-Garcia J, PadillaPaz LA. Prevention and treatment of abdominal wall bleeding complications at trocar sites: review of the literature. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2009
  5. 195–7. [CrossRef] 5. Javier Pérez Lara F, Ferrer Berges AF, Oehling H, Moreno ADR, Munoz HO. Haemostatic Patch Envolving Laparoscopic Trocar to Stop Hemorrhage in the Port Site at the Beginning of the Operation. J Minim Invasive Surg Sci 2016
  6. e34138. [CrossRef] 6. Adisa AO, Alatise OI, Agbakwuru EA, Akinola DO, Adejuyigbe O. Wound complications following laparoscopic surgery in a nigerian hospital. Niger J Surg 2014
  7. 92–5. [CrossRef] 7. Moberg AC, Montgomery A. Primary access-related complications with laparoscopy: comparison of blind and open techniques. Surg Endosc 2005
  8. 1196–9. [CrossRef] 8. Karthik S, Augustine AJ, Shibumon MM, Pai MV. Analysis of laparoscopic port site complications: A descriptive study. J Minim Access Surg 2013
  9. 59–64. [CrossRef] 9. Geraci GSC, Pisello F, Li Volsi F, Facella T, Modica G. Trocarrelated abdominal wall bleeding in 200 patients after laparoscopic cholecistectomy: Personal experience. World J Gastroenterol 2006
  10. 7165–7. [CrossRef] 10. Rastogi V, Dy V. Control of port-site bleeding from smaller incisions after laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery: a new, innovative, and easier technique. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2002
  11. 224–6. [CrossRef] 11. Deyo GA. Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1992
  12. 41–8. 12. Rastogi V, Dy V. Control of port-site bleeding from smaller incisions after laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery: a new, innovative, and easier technique. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2002
  13. 224–6. [CrossRef] 13. Ruiz-Tovar J, Priego-Jimenez P, Paiva-Coronel GA. Use of Foley’s catheter to control port-site bleeding in bariatric surgery. Obes Surg 2012
  14. 306–8. [CrossRef] 14. Akın ML, Erenoğlu C, Filiz E, Batkin A. Laparoskopik kolesistek