Journals / Laparoscopic Endoscopic Surgical Science / 2020 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 4

Has laparoscopic surgery reduced negative appendectomy rates?

Pages
229–233
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Despite all technological developments, anamnesis and physical examination remain important in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: Negative appendectomies can still be performed despite improvements in imaging methods.
📊
Key Findings & Data:As a result of advances in minimally invasive surgery, laparoscopic appendectomy rates have increased in the treatment of acute appendicitis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Despite all technological developments, anamnesis and physical examination remain important in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Introduction: Negative appendectomies can still be performed despite improvements in imaging methods. As a result of advances in minimally invasive surgery, laparoscopic appendectomy rates have increased in the treatment of acute appendicitis. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of laparoscopic surgery on negative appendectomy rates. Materials and Methods: Patients who underwent appendectomy for acute appendicitis between December 2016 and December 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 293 patients were involved in the study. The patients were divided into two groups: open appendectomy and laparoscopic appendectomy. The demographic characteristics and histopathological diagnosis of the patients were recorded. Differences in patients with histopathological diagnoses, except for acute appendicitis, were analyzed. Results: There were 119 cases in the laparoscopic appendectomy group and 174 cases in the open appendectomy group. The mean age was 35.82 (± 16.48) years. One hundred seventy-six of the cases were male and 117 were female. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of demographic characteristics. The same number of negative appendectomy cases was found in both groups. The result was also statistically insignificant. Conclusion: This study showed that laparoscopic appendectomy did not reduce the negative appendectomy rates. Despite the advances in imaging methods, such as ultrasound and computed tomography, and the advantages of laparoscopy in abdominal exploration, the rates of negative appendectomy are still considerable. Despite all technological developments, anamnesis and physical examination remain important in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

🔖

Cite This Article

DİNCER, M., LİMAN, R. K. (2020). Has laparoscopic surgery reduced negative appendectomy rates?. Laparoscopic Endoscopic Surgical Science, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 4, 229–233. https://ajindex.com/articles/413655

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Addiss DG, Shaffer N, Fowler BS, Tauxe RV. The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemiol 1990
  2. 910–25. [CrossRef] 2. Stewart B, Khanduri P, McCord C, Ohene-Yeboah M, Uranues S, Vega Rivera F, et al. Global disease burden of conditions requiring emergency surgery. Br J Surg 2014
  3. e9–22. [CrossRef] 3. Mohebbi HA, Mehrvarz S, Kashani MT, Kabir A, Moharamzad Y. Predicting negative appendectomy by using demographic, clinical, and laboratory parameters: a cross-sectional study. Int J Surg 2008
  4. 115–8. [CrossRef] 4. Flum DR, Koepsell T. The clinical and economic correlates of misdiagnosed appendicitis: nationwide analysis. Arch Surg 2002
  5. 799–804. [CrossRef] 5. Charfi S, Sellami A, Affes A, Yaïch, Mzali R, Boudawara TS. Histopathological findings in appendectomy specimens: a study of 24,697 cases. Int J Colorectal Dis 2014
  6. 1009–12. 6. Zoarets I, Poluksht N, Halevy A. Does selective use of computed tomography scan reduce the rate of “white”(negative) appendectomy? The Israel Medical Association journal: IMAJ 2014
  7. 335–7. 7. Ma KW, Chia NH, Yeung HW, Cheung MT. If not appendicitis, then what else can it be? A retrospective review of 1492 appendectomies. Hong Kong Med J 2010
  8. 12–7. 8. Kryzauskas M, Danys D, Poskus T, Mikalauskas S, Poskus E, Jotautas V, et al. Is acute appendicitis still misdiagnosed? Open Med (Wars) 2016
  9. 231–6. [CrossRef] 9. Chaar C, Wexelman B, Zuckerman K, Longo W. Intusseption of the appendix: comprehensive review of the literature. Am J Surg 2009
  10. 122–8. [CrossRef] 10. Garg CP, Vaidya BB, Chengalath MM. Efficacy of laparoscopy in complicated appendicitis. International journal of surgery 2009
  11. 250–2. [CrossRef] 11. Kulik I, Pokoliukhin SN. High time to make choice: preventive or curative appendectomy? Khirurgiia 1999
  12. 23–6. 12. Omiyale AO, Adjepong S. Histopathological correlations of appendectomies: a clinical audit of a single center. Ann Transl Med 2015
  13. Jones K, Peña AA, Dunn EL, Nadalo L, Mangram AJ. Are negative appendectomies still acceptable? Am J Surg 2004
  14. 748–54. [CrossRef] 14. McGory ML, Zingmond DS, Nanayakkara D, Maggard MA, Ko CY. Negative appendectomy rate: influence of CT scans. The American surgeon 2005
  15. 803–8. [CrossRef] 15. Applegate KE, Sivit CJ, Salvator AE, Borisa VJ, Dudgeon DL, Stallion AE, et al. Effect of cross-sectional imaging on negative appendectomy and perforation rates in children. Radiology 2001
  16. 103–7. [CrossRef] 16. Singh K