Journals / Turkish Journal of Hematology / 2013 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 1

Uyarılmamış venöz tromboz hastalarında yapışkan trombosit sendromu

Sticky platelet syndrome in patients with uninduced venous thrombosis

Pages
48–52
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: The present findings indicate that the prevalence of SPS was 21% in the patients with uninduced venous thrombosis.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Sticky platelet syndrome (SPS) is a common autosomal dominant inherited platelet disorder.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: The study included 28 patients (15 male and 13 female) with uninduced venous thrombosis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: The present findings indicate that the prevalence of SPS was 21% in the patients with uninduced venous thrombosis.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Sticky platelet syndrome (SPS) is a common autosomal dominant inherited platelet disorder. SPS is characterized by platelet hyperreactivity and is associated with arterial and venous thrombosis. The aim of this study was to determine the role of SPS in patients with uninduced venous thrombosis. Material and Methods: The study included 28 patients (15 male and 13 female) with uninduced venous thrombosis. SPS was defined according to Mammen’s aggregation method, which is described in detail elsewhere. Results: According to the defined ranges for platelet hyperreactivity, 3 (50%) patients, 2 (33%), and 1 (17%) (n =6 [21%]) with a confirmed diagnosis were classified as type II, I, and III SPS, respectively. In 1 patient SPS was the only hereditary abnormality noted. The other 5 patients carried other inherited coagulation defects, in addition to SPS. Conclusion: The present findings indicate that the prevalence of SPS was 21% in the patients with uninduced venous thrombosis. We therefore suggest that SPS should be considered in the differential diagnosis of such cases.

Özet

Amaç: Yapışkan trombosit sendromu (YTS) trombosit hiperreaktivitesi ile karakterize sık rastlanan, otozomal baskın kalıtımlı, arteryel ve venöz tromboz ile ilişkili bir trombosit hastalığıdır. Bu çalışmanın temel amacı uyarılmamış venöz tromboz ile başvuran hastalarda YTS’nin rolünün belirlenmesidir. Gereç ve Yöntemler: YTS’nin tanımlanmasında daha önce Mammen tarafından tanımlanmış olan agregasyon metodu kullanılmış ve çalışmaya uyarılmamış venöz trombozu olan 28 hasta (15 erkek ve 13 kadın) dahil edilmiştir. Bulgular: Kendi normal değerlerimizi kullanarak trombosit hiperreaktivitesini değerlendirdiğimizde üç hasta (%50) tip II, iki hasta (%33) tip I ve bir hasta (%17) tip III YTS (toplam 6; %21) olarak sınıflandı. Bir hastada YTS saptanan tek kalıtsal bozukluktu. Beş hastada YTS’ye ek kalıtsal koagülasyon bozuklukları saptandı. Sonuç: Sonuçlarımız uyarılmamış venöz tromboz olgularında YTS sıklığının %21 olduğunu ve YTS’nin bu hasta grubunun ayırıcı tanısında düşünülmesi gerektiğini göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

TEKGÜNDÜZ, E., DEMİR, A. M., AKYOL, A. E., AKPINAR, S., ÖZTÜRK, E., KIRKIZLAR, O. (2013). Uyarılmamış venöz tromboz hastalarında yapışkan trombosit sendromu. Turkish Journal of Hematology, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 1, 48–52. https://ajindex.com/articles/412578

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Bick RL. Introduction to thrombosis: Proficient and costeffective approaches to thrombosis. Hematol Oncol Clin N Am 2003;17:1-8
  2. Bick RL. Sticky platelet syndrome: a common cause of unexplained arterial and venous thrombosis. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 1998;4:77-81
  3. Mammen EF Ten Years’ Experience with the “Sticky Platelet Syndrome”. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 1995;1:66-72
  4. Holiday PL, Mammen E, Gilroy J. Sticky platelet syndrome and cerebral infarction in young adults. Presented at the Ninth International Joint Conference on Stroke and Cerebral Circulation; 1983 (abstract). Phoenix, Arizona. Circulation 1983 (suppl)
  5. Bick RL, Jakway J, Baker WF Deep vein thrombosis: prevalence of etiologic factors and results of management in 100 consecutive patients. Sem Thromb Hemost 1992;18:267-274
  6. Rubenfire M, Blevins RD, Barnhart MI, Housholder S, Selik N, Mammen EF Platelet hyperaggregability in patients with chest pain and normal coronary arteries. Am J Cardiol 1986;57:657-660
  7. Bick RL, Hoppensteadt D. Recurrent miscarriage syndrome and infertility due to blood coagulation protein/platelet defects: a review and update. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 2005;11:1-13
  8. Sand M, Mann B, Bechara FG, Sand D. Sticky platelet syndrome type II presenting with arteriel microemboli in the fingers. Throm Res 2009;124:244
  9. Mears KA, Van Stavern GP. Bilateral simultaneous anterior ischemic optic neuropathy associated with sticky platelet syndrome. Br J Ophthalmol 2009;93:885-886
  10. Randhawa S, Van Stavern GP. Sticky platelet syndrome and anterior ischemic optic neuropathy. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2007;35:779-781
  11. Mühlfeld AS, Ketteler M, Schwamborn K, Eitner F Schneider B, Gladziwa U, Knüchel R, Floege J. Sticky platelet syndrome: an underrecognized cause of graft dysfunction and thromboembolic complications in renal transplant recipients. Am J Transplant 2007;7:1865-1868
  12. El-Amm JM, Andersen J, Gruber SA. Sticky platelet syndrome: a manageable risk factor for posttransplant thromboembolic events. Am J Transplant 2008;8:465
  13. Bick RL, Fareed J. Sticky Platelet Syndrome: The Clinical Spectrum of Thrombosis. Blood 2005; 106: (abstract#4138
  14. Ruiz-Arguelles JG, Lopez-Martinez B, Valdes-Tapia P, Gomez- Rangel JD, Reyes-Nunez V, Garces-Eisele J. Primary thrombophilia in Mexico. V. A comprehensive prospective study indicates that most cases are multifactorial. Am J Hematol 2005;78:21-26
  15. Frenkel EP, Mammen EF Sticky platelet syndrome and thrombocytemi