AI Summary & Key Takeaways
AI InsightCompared to the culture method, the RT-PCR assay had an overall sensitivity of 91.8% (34/37) and a specificity of 93.6%.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
Özet
Devrim F, Gülfidan G, Gözmen S, Demirağ B, Oymak Y, Yaman Y, Oruç Y, Yaşar N, Apa H, Bayram N, Vergin C, Devrim İ. Comparison of the BD GeneOhm VanR assay and a chromogenic agar-based culture method in screening for vancomycin-resistant enterococci in rectal specimens of pediatric hematology-oncology patients. Turk J Pediatr 2015; 57: 161-166.VRE species are an increasingly important and universal problem in intensive care units and hematology-oncology departments due to the spread of glycopeptide resistance. Rapid and accurate identification of VRE is therefore crucial. The intent of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of a real-time PCR test, the BD GeneOhm VanR assay (GeneXpert vanA/vanB, Cepheid, USA), with conventional cultures for screening hospitalized immunocompromised hematology-oncology patients for VRE. Three hundred and six duplicate rectal swab specimens were obtained from 120 pediatric hematology-oncology patients. PCR and conventional culture-based studies were performed. One hundred and twenty patients, 46 female and 74 male, participated in the study. The mean age of the patients was 7.5±4.7 years. A total of 51 specimens from 306 samples were found to be positive for vanA or vanB. Mean turnaround time for PCR was 0.5±0.2 days. Compared to the culture method, the RT-PCR assay had an overall sensitivity of 91.8% (34/37) and a specificity of 93.6%. The positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 66.6% and 98.8%, respectively. This study demonstrates that RT-PCR is a suitable alternative to culture-based procedures for rapid and accurate identification of VRE in hematology-oncology patients, as the overall performance of PCR is comparable to that of a chromogenic agar-based culture method for VRE screening, especially for detection of VRE-negative patients.