Journals / Turkish Journal of Pediatrics / 2019 / Cilt: 61 - Sayı: 4

Cranial MR characteristics of Cerebral Palsy cases and correlation of findings with clinical results

Pages
525–537
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The percentage of patients with natal causes only was 21.5%.Kernicterus, cerebrovascular causes and HIE accounted for 6.3%, 2.9% and54.4% of the cases, respectively.This study may indicate the importance of consanguineous marriage, natal andpostnatal care properties as the underlying causes of CP beyond the clinicalmanagement related to delivery and allow us to identify strategies for possiblemeasures.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study was to compare cranial Magnetic Resonance (MR)imaging findings in cerebral palsy (CP) patients with clinical findings andevaluate damage ascribed to prenatal, natal and postnatal reasons by preterm,term or postterm characteristics.One thousand, one hundred CP patients registered at Dr.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Ayten Bozkaya StateHospital of Cerebral Palsy Children and Rehabilitation Center from 2007 to2010 were included in the study retrospectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The percentage of patients with natal causes only was 21.5%.Kernicterus, cerebrovascular causes and HIE accounted for 6.3%, 2.9% and54.4% of the cases, respectively.This study may indicate the importance of consanguineous marriage, natal andpostnatal care properties as the underlying causes of CP beyond the clinicalmanagement related to delivery and allow us to identify strategies for possiblemeasures.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2007 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

The aim of this study was to compare cranial Magnetic Resonance (MR)imaging findings in cerebral palsy (CP) patients with clinical findings andevaluate damage ascribed to prenatal, natal and postnatal reasons by preterm,term or postterm characteristics.One thousand, one hundred CP patients registered at Dr. Ayten Bozkaya StateHospital of Cerebral Palsy Children and Rehabilitation Center from 2007 to2010 were included in the study retrospectively. Cranial MR images studied inBursa State Hospital Radiology Unit were evaluated by “a single senior MRIradiologist”.The most common abnormality was cerebral atrophy (80.2%) followed byperiventricular leukomalacia (PVL) (49.9%). The most common type wasspastic tetraplegia (67.9%), and the second most common type was hypotonicCP (15.6%). The percentage of congenital central nervous system (CNS)abnormality was 14.09%. The most common abnormality was corpus callosum(CC) agenesis and colpocephaly (2.3%). The least common conditions werecortical dysplasia, heterotopia and rhombencephalosynapsis. The percentageof cases born to consanguineous parents was 19.2%. In Hypoxic IschemicEncephalopathy (HIE) patients born to consanguineous parents, PVL was cysticand moderate. Consanguineous marriage was statistically significant in thepatients with cortical dysplasia and heterotopia (p<0.04), delay in myelination(p<0.001) and thalamus involvement (p< 0.008). Consanguineous marriagewas also statistically significant in spastic diparetic (p<0.017), hypotonic(p<0.001) and bedridden patients (p< 0.006). The presence of both congenitalCNS anomaly and PVL was only revealed in spastic tetraparetic type. Twentynine% of the cases were premature, while 66.4% were term children. Lowbirth weight (32.7%) constituted a risk factor for all clinical types, exceptmixed type CP. The percentage of patients with natal causes only was 21.5%.Kernicterus, cerebrovascular causes and HIE accounted for 6.3%, 2.9% and54.4% of the cases, respectively.This study may indicate the importance of consanguineous marriage, natal andpostnatal care properties as the underlying causes of CP beyond the clinicalmanagement related to delivery and allow us to identify strategies for possiblemeasures.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALİ, A., YALÇIN, R., GÜMÜŞTAŞ, A. Ü. (2019). Cranial MR characteristics of Cerebral Palsy cases and correlation of findings with clinical results. Turkish Journal of Pediatrics, Cilt: 61 - Sayı: 4, 525–537. https://ajindex.com/articles/412097

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Reddihough DS, Collins KJ. The epidemiology and causes of cerebral palsy. Aust J Physiother 2003; 49: 7-12
  2. Ashwal S, Russman BS, Blasco PA, et al; Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology; Practice Committee of the Child Neurology Society. Practice Parameter: Diagnostic assessment of the child with cerebral palsy: Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the Practice Committee of the Child Neurology Society. Am Acad Neurol (AAN) 2004; 62: 851-863
  3. Rethlefsen SA, Ryan DD, Kay RM. Classification systems in cerebral palsy. Orthop Clin North Am 2010; 41: 457-467
  4. Paneth N. Establishing the diagnosis of cerebral palsy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2008; 51: 742-748
  5. Jones MW, Morgan E, Shelton JE, Thorogood C. Cerebral palsy: introduction and diagnosis. J Pediatr Health Care 2007; 21: 146-152
  6. Johnston MV, Hoon AH Jr. Cerebral palsy. Neuromolecular Med 2006; 8: 435-450
  7. Shevell M, Miller SP, Scherer SW, Yager JY, Fehlings MG. The cerebral palsy demonstration project: A multidimensional research approach to cerebral palsy. Semin Pediatr Neurol 2011; 18: 31-39
  8. Johnston MV, Hagberg H. Sex and the pathogenesis of cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol 2007; 49: 74-78
  9. Legault G,Shevell MI, Dagenais L; Quebec Cerebral Palsy Registry Consortium. Predicting comorbidities with neuroimaging in children with cerebral palsy. Pediatr Neurol 2011; 45: 229-232
  10. Korzeniewski SJ, Birbeck G, Delano MC, Potchen MJ, Paneth N. A systematic review of neuroimaging for cerebral palsy. J Child Neurol 2008; 23: 216-227
  11. Krägeloch-Mann I. Understanding causation of cerebral palsy by using magnetic resonance imaging. Paediatr Child Health 2008; 18: 399-404
  12. Krägeloch-Mann I, Horber V. The role of magnetic resonance imaging in elucidating the pathogenesis of cerebral palsy: a systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol 2007; 49: 144- 151
  13. Himmelmann K, Horber V, De La Cruz J, et al; SCPE Working Group. MRI classification system(MRICS) for children with cerebral palsy: development, reliability and recommendations. Dev Med Child Neurol 2017; 59: 57-64
  14. Tollånes MC, Wilcox AJ, Lie RT, Moster D. Familial risk of cerebral palsy: population based cohort study. Research. BMJ 2014; 349: 1-8
  15. Moreno-De-Luca A, Ledbetter DH, Martin CL. Genomic insights into the etiology and classification of the cerebral palsies Lancet Neurol 2012; 11: 283- 292
  16. Shorvon S. MRI of cortical dysgenesis. Ep