SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Journal of Pediatrics / 2019 / Cilt: 61 - Sayı: 3

Correlation of the Bayley scales of infant-toddler development-3rd edition and neuro-sensory motor assessment in preterm infants during the first year of life.

Özgün Kaya KARA
Mintaze Kerem GÜNEL
Şule YİĞİT
Pages
399–406
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

For identifying motor impairments using the Bayley-III in low birthweight and preterm infants at 1, 4, 8, and 12 months old, the proper cut-offscores are 80–85.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study was to determine the best cut-off score for determiningmotor delay in the Motor Scale of the Bayley Scales of Infant-ToddlerDevelopment-3rd Edition (Bayley-III) when compared to the Neuro-SensoryMotor Development Assessment (NSMDA) for low birth weight and preterminfants during the first year of life.
📊
Key Findings & Data:One hundred and sixty infants born before32 weeks of gestation and with birth weights of 1500 grams or less wereincluded.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:For identifying motor impairments using the Bayley-III in low birthweight and preterm infants at 1, 4, 8, and 12 months old, the proper cut-offscores are 80–85.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

The aim of this study was to determine the best cut-off score for determiningmotor delay in the Motor Scale of the Bayley Scales of Infant-ToddlerDevelopment-3rd Edition (Bayley-III) when compared to the Neuro-SensoryMotor Development Assessment (NSMDA) for low birth weight and preterminfants during the first year of life. One hundred and sixty infants born before32 weeks of gestation and with birth weights of 1500 grams or less wereincluded. Classifications of delay using different Bayley-III cut-offs werecross-tabulated with the NSMDA functional classification. Predictive valuesof sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictivevalue were calculated with 95% CIs. The sensitivity of a Bayley-III cut-off<85 was 100% at 1, 8, and 12 months and 92.3% at 4 months. The best scoreon the Bayley-III for identifying infants with mild/moderate/severe motorproblems on the NSMDA was 80 (100% at 1, 4, and 8 months; 91.3% at 12months). For identifying motor impairments using the Bayley-III in low birthweight and preterm infants at 1, 4, 8, and 12 months old, the proper cut-offscores are 80–85.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARA, Ö. K., GÜNEL, M. K., YİĞİT, Ş. (2019). Correlation of the Bayley scales of infant-toddler development-3rd edition and neuro-sensory motor assessment in preterm infants during the first year of life.. Turkish Journal of Pediatrics, Cilt: 61 - Sayı: 3, 399–406. https://ajindex.com/articles/411995

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Byrne R, Noritz G, Maitre NL; NCH Early Developmental Group. Implementation of early diagnosis and intervention guidelines for cerebral palsy in a high-risk infant follow-up clinic. Pediatr Neurol 2017; 76: 66-71
  2. Platt MJ, Cans C, Johnson A, et al. Trends in cerebral palsy among infants of very low birthweight ( 3. Chorna OD, Guzzetta A, Maitre NL. Vision assessments and interventions for infants 0-2 years at high risk for cerebral palsy: A systematic review. Pediatr Neurol 2017; 76: 3-13
  3. Neubauer AP, Voss W, Kattner E. Outcome of extremely low birth weight survivors at school age: the influence of perinatal parameters on neurodevelopment. Eur J Pediatr 2008; 167: 87-95
  4. Hadders-Algra M. Early human motor development: From variation to the ability to vary and adapt. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2018; 90: 411-427
  5. Vaccarino F, Ment LR. Injury and repair in developing brain. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2004; 89: F190-F192
  6. Spittle AJ, Doyle LW, Boyd RN. A systematic review of the clinimetric properties of neuromotor assessments for preterm infants during the first year of life. Dev Med Child Neurol 2008; 50: 254-266
  7. Nuysink J, van Haastert IC, Eijsermans MJ, et al. Prediction of gross motor development and independent walking in infants born very preterm using the Test of Infant Motor Performance and the Alberta Infant Motor Scale. Early Hum Dev 2013; 89: 693-697
  8. Zuk L. Fetal and infant spontaneous general movements as predictors of developmental disabilities. J Dev Disabil Res Rev 2011; 17: 93-101
  9. Aylward GP. Continuing issues with the Bayley-III: where to go from here. J Dev Behav Pediatr 2013; 34: 697-701
  10. Spittle AJ, Spencer-Smith MM, Eeles AL, et al. Does the Bayley-III Motor Scale at 2 years predict motor outcome at 4 years in very preterm children? Dev Med Child Neurol 2013; 55: 448-452
  11. Johnson S, Moore T, Marlow N. Using the Bayley-III to assess neurodevelopmental delay: which cut-off should be used? Pediatr Res 2014; 75: 670-674
  12. Moore T, Johnson S, Haider S, Hennessy E, Marlow N. Relationship between test scores using the second and third editions of the Bayley Scales in extremely preterm children. J Pediatr 2012; 160: 553-558
  13. Vohr BR, Stephens BE, Higgins RD, et al; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. Are outcomes of extremely preterm infants improving? Impact of Bayley assessment on outcomes. J Pediatr 2012; 161: 222-228.e3. 15.