Journals / Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology / 2022 / Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 2

Effect of Modified Blumgart Anastomosis on Surgical Outcomes After Pancreaticoduodenectomy

Pages
119–126
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, modified Blumgart anastomosis is an independent and negative predictive factor for the development of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background: Surgeons continue to be concerned about complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy, especially postoperative pancreatic fistula.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: A total of 144 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy were divided into 2 groups according to the performed pancreaticojejunostomy technique (modified Blumgart anastomosis, n = 91 and traditional anastomosis, n = 53).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, modified Blumgart anastomosis is an independent and negative predictive factor for the development of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Background: Surgeons continue to be concerned about complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy, especially postoperative pancreatic fistula. Among the factors that cause postoperative pancreatic fistula, the pancreaticojejunostomy technique has stood out in recent studies. In this study, we aimed to compare the surgical outcomes, especially POPF, of the modified Blumgart and the traditional anastomosis techniques in patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy. Methods: A total of 144 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy were divided into 2 groups according to the performed pancreaticojejunostomy technique (modified Blumgart anastomosis, n = 91 and traditional anastomosis, n = 53). Preoperative clinicodemographic data, perioperative findings, and postoperative results were compared between the groups. Additionally, factors associated with clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula were analyzed. Results: The modified Blumgart anastomosis group had lower clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula rate than traditional anastomosis group (n = 8 (8.8%) versus n = 14 (26.4%), P = .005). On the contrary, the biochemical leakage rate was higher in the modified Blumgart anastomosis group (n = 30 (33%) versus n = 9 (17%), P = .037). While postoperative pancreatic fistula-related reoperation rate was lower (n = 2 (2.2%) versus n = 7 (13.2%), P = .013), the length of hospital stay was also shorter (11 days (5-47 days) versus 21 days (6-46 days), P < .001) in the modified Blumgart anastomosis group. Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that modified Blumgart anastomosis was an independent and negative predictive factor for clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (odds ratio = 0.274, 95% confidence interval = 0.103-0.728, P = .009). Conclusion: Compared to the traditional anastomosis, modified Blumgart anastomosis decreases the rate of transition from biochemical leakage to clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula and postoperative pancreatic fistula-related reoperation and also shortens the length of hospital stay. In addition, modified Blumgart anastomosis is an independent and negative predictive factor for the development of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZŞAY, O., AYDIN, M. C. (2022). Effect of Modified Blumgart Anastomosis on Surgical Outcomes After Pancreaticoduodenectomy. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 2, 119–126. https://ajindex.com/articles/411625

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Kalev G, Marquardt C, Matzke H, Matovu P, Schiedeck T. The modified Blumgart anastomosis after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective single center cohort study [Epub ahead of print]. Innov Surg Sci. 2020;5(3-4):20200021. [CrossRef] 2. Whipple AO, Parsons WB, Mullins CR. Treatment of carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater. Ann Surg. 1935;102(4):763-779. [CrossRef] 3. Oguro S, Yoshimoto J, Imamura H, Ishizaki Y, Kawasaki S. Three hundred and sixty-eight consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies with zero mortality. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2017;24(4):226- 234. [CrossRef] 4. Machado MC, Machado MA. Systematic use of isolated pancreatic anastomosis after pancreatoduodenectomy: five years of experience with zero mortality. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016;42(10):1584-1590. [CrossRef] 5. Gupta V, Kumar S, Gupta V, et al. Blumgart’s technique of pancreaticojejunostomy: analysis of safety and outcomes. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2019;18(2):181-187. [CrossRef] 6. Mishra PK, Saluja SS, Gupta M, Rajalingam R, Pattnaik P. Blumgart’s technique of pancreaticojejunostomy: an appraisal. Dig Surg. 2011;28(4):281-287. [CrossRef] 7. Vollmer CM Jr, Sanchez N, Gondek S, et al. A root-cause analysis of mortality following major pancreatectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16(1):89-102; discussion 102. [CrossRef] 8. Li YT, Zhang HY, Xing C, et al. Effect of Blumgart anastomosis in reducing the incidence rate of pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy. World J Gastroenterol. 2019;25(20):2514-2523. [CrossRef] 9. Hogg ME, Zenati M, Novak S, et al. Grading of surgeon technical performance predicts postoperative pancreatic fistula for pancreaticoduodenectomy independent of patient-related variables. Ann Surg. 2016;264(3):482-491. [CrossRef] 10. Grobmyer SR, Kooby D, Blumgart LH, Hochwald SN. Novel pancreaticojejunostomy with a low rate of anastomotic failure-related complications. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;210(1):54-59. [CrossRef] 11. Kleespies A, Rentsch M, Seeliger H, Albertsmeier M, Jauch KW, Bruns CJ. Blumgart anastomosis for pancreaticojejunostomy minimizes severe complications after pancreatic head resection. Br J Surg. 2009;96(7):741-750. [CrossRef] 12. Lee YN, Kim WY. Comparison of Blumgart versus conventional duct-to-mucosa anastomosis for pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2018;22(3):253-260. [CrossRef] 13. Kim SG, Paik KY, Oh JS. The vulnerable point of modified Blumgart pancreaticojejunostomy regarding pancreatic fistula lea