Journals / Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 5

Endoskopik retrograd kolanjiopankreatikografiye bağlı perforasyonların tedavisi

Management of perforation after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

Pages
441–448
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The most appropriate treatment course should be determined on case-by-case basis.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:BACKGROUND: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-related perforation is an infrequent complication.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It is associated with significant morbidity and mortality.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The most appropriate treatment course should be determined on case-by-case basis.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-related perforation is an infrequent complication. It is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The present study is an evaluation of experience with management and outcomes of ERCP-related perforations and a review of relevant literature.METHODS: Between January 2008 and January 2015, a total of 9383 ERCPs were performed in endoscopy unit. A total of 29 perforations (0.33%) were identified and retrospectively reviewed.RESULTS: Of the 29 patients, 18 were female and 11 patients were male, with mean age of 70.5 years (range 33-99 years). According to Stapfer's classification, the 29 patients with ERCP related perforations included 5 type 1 perforations, 14 type 2 perforations, 7 type 3 perforations, and 3 cases of type 4 perforation. In total, 15 of 29 patients with ERCP perforation were operated on. Nine (60%) of those who underwent surgery were discharged uneventful, but 6 (40%) patients died due to postoperative complications and/or associated comorbidities. Seven (24.1%) of 29 patients had undergone endoscopic treatment and 5 of the 7 were discharged from the hospital without any problems; however, peritonitis occurred in 2 patients whose initial endoscopic treatment failed. The first of these 2 patients underwent surgery and was discharged uneventfully, but second patient, who refused surgery, died due to sepsis. Six patients were successfully treated with conservative management. Surgery could not be performed in the remaining 2 patients, who died of sepsis following peritonitis; 1 refused surgery, the other had sudden cardiopulmonary arrest during induction of general anesthesia. Mean hospital stay was 13.2 days (range: 2-57 days). In all, 9 (31%) patients died during period of the study.CONCLUSION: ERCP-related perforation is uncommon complication, but an extremely serious condition. Early diagnosis and prompt management are most important to reduce associated significant morbidity and mortality rates. The most appropriate treatment course should be determined on case-by-case basis.

Özet

AMAÇ: Endoskopik retrograd kolanjiopankreatikografiye (ERKP) bağlı perforasyonlar az görülmelerine karşılık yüksek morbidite ve mortalite oranlarına sahiptir. Bu çalışmada ERKP'ye bağlı perforasyonların tedavisi ve sonuçlarımıza ait tecrübelerimizi değerlendirmeyi ve ilgili literatürün gözden geçirilmesini amaçladık.GEREÇ VE YÖNTEM: Ocak 2008 ve Ocak 2015 yılları arasında İzmir Katip Çelebi Üniversitesi, Atatürk Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Endoskopi Ünitesi'nde toplam 9383 ERKP işlemi yapıldı. Bu hastaların 29'unda (%0.33), ERKP'ye bağlı perforasyon tespit edildi ve bu hastalara ait veriler geriye dönük olarak değerlendirildi.BULGULAR: Yirmi dokuz hastanın 18'i kadın, 11'i erkek hasta olup, ortalama yaş 70.5 (33-99 yaşlar arası) idi. Stapfer sınıflandırmasına göre 5 hastada tip 1, 14 hastada tip 2, 7 hastada tip 3 ve 3 hastada da tip 4 perforasyon saptandı. Toplam olarak, 15 hastaya cerrahi tedavi uygulandı; bunlardan 9'u (%60) sorunsuz olarak taburcu edilirken, 6 (%40) hasta ameliyat sonrası komplikasyonlardan dolayı öldü. Yirmi dokuz hastanın 7'sinde (%24.1) ise başlangıçta endoskopik tedavi uygulandı ve bu hastalardan beşi sorunsuz olarak taburcu edildi. Ancak endoskopik tedavi iki hastada başarısız oldu. Peritonit gelişen bu 2 hastadan ilki, cerrahi tedavi sonrası sorunsuz olarak taburcu edildi. Cerrahi tedaviyi kabul etmeyen diğer hasta ise sepsis nedeni ile öldü. Altı hasta konservatif tıbbi tedavi ile başarılı bir şekilde tedavi edildi. Peritonit sonrası gelişen sepsis nedeniyle hayatını kaybeden 2 hastadan ilkinde hasta ve yakınlarının cerrahi tedaviyi reddetmesi nedeniyle, diğer hastada ise, anestezinin indüksiyon evresinde ani gelişen kardiyopulmoner arrest sonucu cerrahi tedavi yapılamadı. Çalışmamızda ortalama hastanede kalma süresi 13.2 gün (2-57), ölen hasta sayısı ise dokuz (%31) idi.TARTIŞMA: Endoskopik retrograd kolanjiopankreatikografiye bağlı perforasyonlar nadir görülmesine karşılık yüksek mortalite oranları yol açabilme-si nedeni ile son derece önemli bir klinik durumdur. Erken tanı ve tedavi mortalite ve morbidite oranlarının azaltılmasında çok önemlidir. En uygun tedavi yöntemi, hastanın bireysel özellikleri ve klinik durumu göz önünde bulundurularak verilmelidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

TAVUSBAY, C., ALPER, E., GÖKOVA, M., KAMER, E., KAR, H., ATAHAN, K., ÖZŞAY, O., GÜR, E. Ö., CİN, N., ÇAPKINOĞLU, E., DURAK, E. (2016). Endoskopik retrograd kolanjiopankreatikografiye bağlı perforasyonların tedavisi. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 5, 441–448. https://ajindex.com/articles/324027

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Loperfido S, Angelini G, Benedetti G, Chilovi F, Costan F, De Berardinis F, et al. Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 1998;48:1-10.
  2. Masci E, Toti G, Mariani A, Curioni S, Lomazzi A, Dinelli M, et al. Complications of diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective mul- ticenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 2001;96:417-23.
  3. Enns R, Eloubeidi MA, Mergener K, Jowell PS, Branch MS, Pappas TM, et al. ERCP-related perforations: risk factors and management. Endos- copy 2002;34:293-8.
  4. Stapfer M, Selby RR, Stain SC, Katkhouda N, Parekh D, Jabbour N, et al. Management of duodenal perforation after endoscopic retrograde chol- angiopancreatography and sphincterotomy. Ann Surg 2000;232:191-8.
  5. Howard TJ, Tan T, Lehman GA, Sherman S, Madura JA, Fogel E, et al. Classification and management of perforations complicating endoscopic sphincterotomy. Surgery 1999;126:658-65.
  6. Williams EJ, Taylor S, Fairclough P, Hamlyn A, Logan RF, Martin D, et al. Risk factors for complication following ERCP; results of a large-scale, prospective multicenter study. Endoscopy 2007;39:793-801.
  7. Fatima J, Baron TH, Topazian MD, Houghton SG, Iqbal CW, Ott BJ, et al. Pancreaticobiliary and duodenal perforations after periampul- lary endoscopic procedures: diagnosis and management. Arch Surg 2007;142:448-55.
  8. Lee TH, Han JH, Park SH. Endoscopic treatments of endoscopic ret- rograde cholangiopancreatography-related duodenal perforations. Clin Endosc 2013;46:522-8.
  9. Wu HM, Dixon E, May GR, Sutherland FR. Management of perfora- tion after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): a population-based review. HPB (Oxford) 2006;8:393-9.
  10. Lai CH, Lau WY. Management of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopan- creatography-related perforation. Surgeon 2008;6:45-8.
  11. Li G, Chen Y, Zhou X, Lv N. Early management experience of perfora- tion after ERCP. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2012;2012:657418. Alexiou K, Sakellaridis T, Sikalias N, Karanikas I, Economou N, Antsak- lis G. Subcutaneous emphysema, pneumomediastinum and pneumoperi- toneum after unsuccessful ERCP: a case report. Cases J 2009;2:120. Fujii L, Lau A, Fleischer DE, Harrison ME. Successful Nonsurgical Treatment of Pneumomediastinum, Pneumothorax, Pneumoperitone- um, Pneumoretroperitoneum, and Subcutaneous Emphysema following ERCP. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2010;2010:289135. Lee TH, Bang BW, Jeong JI, Kim HG, Jeong S, Park SM, et al. Pri- mary endoscopic approximation suture under