Journals / Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology / 2004 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 2

Üst gastrointestinal sistem submukozal lezyonlarının tanısında endoskopik ultrasonografininin doğruluğu

Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography in upper gastrointestinal submucosal lesions

Pages
82–85
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusions: EUS is an accurate means of evaluating and diagnosing submuocal lesions of the gastrointestinal tract.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and consistency of the EUS findings with histopathologic examination.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: EUS was performed in 90 patients with upper gastrointestinal tract submucosal tumors, followed in Turkiye Yuksek Ihtisas Hospital, Gastroenterology Clinic.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusions: EUS is an accurate means of evaluating and diagnosing submuocal lesions of the gastrointestinal tract.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Leyomiyom · Endosonografi · Üst gastrointestinal sistem

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and consistency of the EUS findings with histopathologic examination. Methods: EUS was performed in 90 patients with upper gastrointestinal tract submucosal tumors, followed in Turkiye Yuksek Ihtisas Hospital, Gastroenterology Clinic. Histopathological diagnosis and EUS findings of 25 of 90 patients were compared. Results: 48.9% of the lesions were found to have arisen from muscularis propria, 33.3% from submucosa, 6.6% from mucosa and 10% from muscularis mucosae, and 1.2% from serosa of the 90 patients. In 25 patients histopathologic confirmation was done. 24% of 25 patients were leiomyoma, 20% polyp, 12% lipoma and the remainder were teratoma, carcinoid tumor, adenocarcinoma, polyp and leiomyosarcoma. EUS was successful in detecting all tumors. EUS diagnosis was consistent with histopathogical diagnosis in all patients with EUS findings as leiomyosarcoma (n=2) and polyp (n=6), in 46.2% of patients with EUS findings as leiomyoma, and in 50% of those with lipoma. Conclusions: EUS is an accurate means of evaluating and diagnosing submuocal lesions of the gastrointestinal tract.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, üst gastrointestinal sistemin submukozal lezyonlarının endoskopik ultrasongrafi (EUS) bulguları ile histopatolojik tanıyı gösterebilme doğruluğu araştırılmıştır. Yöntem: Türkiye Yüksek İhtisas Hastanesi Gastroenteroloji Kliniğinde, EUS yapılan 90 submukozal tümör hastasının EUS verileri prospektif olarak değerlendirmeye alınmıştır. 25 hastaya histopatolojik olarak tanı konulmuştur. EUS tanısı ve histopatolojik tanıların doğruluğu incelenmiştir. Bulgular: Lezyonların %48.9’u muskularis propriadan, %33.3’ü submukozadan, %6.6’sı mukozadan ve %10’u muskularis mukozadan, %1.2’si ise serozadan köken almıştır. 25 hastada histopatolojik inceleme yapılmıştır. 25 hastanın %24’ünde leiomyom, %20’sinde polip, %12’sinde lipom, geri kalanında ise teratom, karisnoid tümör, adenokarisnom, polip ve leiomyosarkom saptanmıştır. EUS tüm tümörleri tespit edebilmiştir. EUS tanılarının histopatolojik tanılarla uyumlu olduğu olduğu görülmüştür. Sonuç: EUS, üst gastrointestinal sistemin submukozal lezyonlarını göstermede doğru sonuçlar vermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

OĞUZ, D., FİLİK, L., PARLAK, E., DİŞİBEYAZ, S., ÇİÇEK, B., KACAR, S., AYDOĞ, G., ŞAHİN, B. (2004). Üst gastrointestinal sistem submukozal lezyonlarının tanısında endoskopik ultrasonografininin doğruluğu. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 2, 82–85. https://ajindex.com/articles/411203

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Caletti G, Fusaroli P. Endoscopic ultrasonography. Endos copy 1999; 31: 95-102
  2. Saftoiu A, Vilmann P, Ciurea T. Utility of endoscopic ultra sound for the diagnosis and treatment of submucosal tu mors of the upper gastrointestinal tract. Rom J Gastroenterol 2003; 12: 215-29
  3. Shen EF, Arnott 1DR, Plevris J, Penman ID. Endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis and management of sus pected upper gastrointestinal submucosal tumours. Br J Surg 2002; 89: 231-5
  4. Brand B, Oesterhelweg L, Binmoeller KF, et al. Impact of EUS for evaluation of mucosal lesions in gastrointestinal tract. Dig Liver Dis 2002; 34: 290-7
  5. Chen TK, Wu CH, Lee CL, et al. Endoscopic ultrasonog raphy to study the causes of extragastric compression mi micking gastric submucosal tumor. J Formos Assoc 2001; 100: 758-61
  6. Rösch T, Lorenz R, Dancygier H, et al. Endosonographic di agnosis of submucosal upper gastrointestinal tract tumors. Scand J Gastroenterol 1992; 27: 1-8
  7. Rösch T, Kapfer B, Will U, et al. Accuracy of endoscopic ult rasonography in upper gastrointestinal submucosal lesi ons: a prospective multicenter study. Scand J Gastroente rol 2002; 7: 856-62
  8. Palazzo L, Landi B, Cellier C, et al. Endosonographic featu res predictive of benign and malignant gastrointestinal stromal cell tumours. Gut 2000; 46: 88-92
  9. Melzer E, Fidder H. The natural course of upper gastroin testinal submucosal tumors: an endoscopic ultrasound sur vey. Isr Med Assoc J 2000; 2: 430-2.