Journals / Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology / 2001 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 4

Erzurum yöresinde mide kanserleri

Gastric carcinomas in Erzurum region

Pages
294–298
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: The results showed that in Erzurum region, the diffuse (Lauren's classification) and infiltrative types (Ming's classification) of gastric cancer occur at a higher rate compared to the literature data.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Bacground/aims: Histologic typing is important for estimating tumor progression and outcome of patients with gastric carcinoma. in this study, 95 cases of histologically diagnosed primary gastric cancer in resected specimens, obtained from the Pathology Department of Atatürk University Medical Faculty between dates of January 1995 and January 2001 were evaluated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Results: The 95 patients, with an age range of 27 to 78 years (mean age of 57.7 years in males, 57.3 years in females), were classified as type I (3 cases), type II (17 cases), type III (63 cases) and type IV (15 cases) according to Borrmann's classification; and as expanding (44 cases) and infiltrative (51 cases) according to Ming.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: The results showed that in Erzurum region, the diffuse (Lauren's classification) and infiltrative types (Ming's classification) of gastric cancer occur at a higher rate compared to the literature data.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2001 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Türkiye · Mide neoplazmları · Sınıflandırma

Abstract

Bacground/aims: Histologic typing is important for estimating tumor progression and outcome of patients with gastric carcinoma. in this study, 95 cases of histologically diagnosed primary gastric cancer in resected specimens, obtained from the Pathology Department of Atatürk University Medical Faculty between dates of January 1995 and January 2001 were evaluated. Methods: The distribution of the cases according to Borrmann, Lauren, Ming and World Health Organization classifications was evaluated. Results: The 95 patients, with an age range of 27 to 78 years (mean age of 57.7 years in males, 57.3 years in females), were classified as type I (3 cases), type II (17 cases), type III (63 cases) and type IV (15 cases) according to Borrmann's classification; and as expanding (44 cases) and infiltrative (51 cases) according to Ming. They were classified as intestinal type (20 cases), diffuse type ( 44 cases) and mixed unclassified 31cases according to Lauren's criteria and as adenocarcinoma (90 cases), undifferentiated (4 cases) and adenosquamous carcinoma (l cases) according to World Health Organization classification. Conclusion: The results showed that in Erzurum region, the diffuse (Lauren's classification) and infiltrative types (Ming's classification) of gastric cancer occur at a higher rate compared to the literature data.

Özet

Amaç: Mide kanserli hastalarda tümörün seyrini ve hastanın prognozunu belirlemek açısından histolojik tipi belirlemek önemlidir. Bu çalışmada Ocak 1995 ile Ocak 2001 tarihleri arasında Atatürk Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Patoloji Anabilim Dalından elde edilen ve histolojik olarak primer gastrik karsinoma tanısı konan 95 gastrektomi materyali yeniden incelendi. Yöntem: Borrmann, Lauren, Ming ve Dünya Sağlık Örgütü'nün sınıflamasına göre olguların dağılımı yeniden gözden geçirildi. Bulgular: En genç hasta 27 en yaşlı hasta 78 yaşında olup, erkeklerde ortalama yaş 57.7 kadınlarda 57.3 yıl idi. Borrmann sınıflamasına göre: 3 olgu tip I, 17 olgu tip II, 63 olgu tip III ve 15 olgu tip IV idi. Ming sınıflamasına göre: 44 olgu ekspansif, 51 olgu infiltratif idi. Lauren'in kriterlerine göre: 20 intestinal, 44 diffüz ve 31 olgu miks; Dünya Sağlık Örgütü'nün sınıflamasına göre ise 90 olgu adenokarsinom, 4 olgu andiferansiye karsinom ve 1 olgu adenosguamoz karsinom idi. Sonuç: Sonuçlarımız literatür ile karşılaştırıldığında bölgemizde diffüz ve infiltratif tipin daha sık olduğu saptandı.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜRSAN, N., ALBAYRAK, A., GÜRSAN, M. Ş., KELEŞ, M. (2001). Erzurum yöresinde mide kanserleri. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 4, 294–298. https://ajindex.com/articles/410464

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Ming SC. Gastric carcinoma. A pathobiological classification. Cancer 1977; 39: 2475-85
  2. Fenoglio-Preiser CM, Noffsinger AE, Stemmermann GN, et. al. Gastrointestinal Pathology Plus:An Atlas and Text. In:The Neoplastic Stomach. 2 nd ed. Philadelphia: Raven, 1999: 237-74
  3. Rosai J. Ackerman’s Surgical Pathology. In: Rosai J, ed. Gastrointestinal tract/stomach. 7 nd ed. St. Louis: The C.V. Mosby Company, 1989; 487-522
  4. Lauren T. The two histologic main types of gastric carcinoma. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand 1965; 64: 34-5
  5. Oota K, Sobin LH. Histological typing of gastric and oesophageal tumours. In: International Histological Classification of Tumours, No 18. Geneva: WHO, 1977
  6. Kennedy BJ. TNM classification for stomach cancer. Cancer 1970; 26: 971-83
  7. Palli D. Epidemiology of gastric cancer: an evaluation of available evidence. J Gastroenterol 2000; 35:84-9 8. Guardiola MR, Gomez AM, Galiana GR, et al. Incidence of gastric cancer in the 02 health area of Castellon. An Med Interna 1996; 13: 68-72
  8. Ming SC. Classification of gastric carcinoma. In: Filipe MI, Jass JR, eds. Gastric Carcinoma. 2 nd ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1986, p 197
  9. Eğilmez R, Arıcı S, Aker H. Mide kanserleri. Turk Journal of Neoplasia 1995; 3: 67-70
  10. Yokota T, Teshima S, Saito T, et al. Borrmann's type IV gastric cancer: clinicopathologic analysis. Can J Surg 1999; 42: 371-6
  11. Kubo T. Histologic appearance of gastric carcinoma in high and low mortality countries: comparison between Kyushu, Japan and Minnesota, USA. Cancer 1971; 28: 726-30
  12. Amorosi A, Biannchi S, Buiatti E, et al. Gastric cancer in a high-risk area in Italy. Cancer 1988;62: 2191-96
  13. Wu CW, Tsay SH, Hsieh MC, et al. Clinicopathological significance of intestinal and diffuse types of gastric carcinoma in Taiwan Chinese. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1996; 11: 1083-88
  14. Mabogunje OA, Subbuswamy SG, Lawrie JH. The two histological types of gastric carcinoma in Northern Nigeria. Gut 1978; 19: 425-9
  15. Tso PL, Bringaze WL III, Dauterive AH, et al. Gastric carcinoma in the young. Cancer 1987; 59: 1362-5
  16. Radi MJ, Fenoglio CM, Bartow SA, et al. Gastric carcinoma in the young: a clinicopathological and immunohistochemical study. Am J Gastroenterol 1986; 81: 747-53
  17. Tunçyürek M, Alkanat B. 100 Mide karsinomu olgusunun değişik yönleriyle değerlendirilmesi. VIII. Ulusal Patoloji Kongresi Kongre Kitabı. Cilt 1 (Ed. Behsan Önal ) Ankara, Ankara Üniversitesi Basımevi 1989; 621-4. 1