Journals / Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology / 2006 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 2

Özofagus varislerinde sekonder profilaksi: Endoskopik skleroterapi, band ligasyonu ve kombine tedavi: Uzun dönem sonuçlar

Secondary prophylaxis of esophageal variceal treatment: Endoscopic sclerotherapy, band ligation and combined therapy - long-term results

Pages
103–109
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this patient group, the addition of endoscopic sclerotherapy to endoscopic band ligation was a suitable and effective technique in order to achieve variceal eradication.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aims: To evaluate the long-term results of endoscopic sclerotherapy and endoscopic band ligation in secondary prophylaxis on variceal eradication and to evaluate the effectiveness of endoscopic sclerotherapy and endoscopic band ligation combination in resistant cases.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: The results of the patients who underwent endoscopic sclerotherapy (n=47 31M/16F, 49.9±16.1 years) and endoscopic band ligation (n=72 56M/16F, 46.6±14.1 years) were compared.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this patient group, the addition of endoscopic sclerotherapy to endoscopic band ligation was a suitable and effective technique in order to achieve variceal eradication.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Bağlama · Özofageal ve gastrik varisler · Endoskopi

Abstract

Background/aims: To evaluate the long-term results of endoscopic sclerotherapy and endoscopic band ligation in secondary prophylaxis on variceal eradication and to evaluate the effectiveness of endoscopic sclerotherapy and endoscopic band ligation combination in resistant cases. Methods: The results of the patients who underwent endoscopic sclerotherapy (n=47 31M/16F, 49.9±16.1 years) and endoscopic band ligation (n=72 56M/16F, 46.6±14.1 years) were compared. The results of patients whose varices could not be eradicated who were treated with endoscopic band ligation and combined endoscopic sclerotherapy (combined group, n=62 49M/13F, 48.8±12.7 years) are also given. Patients were evaluated for portal hypertension etiology, Child score, fundal varices-portal hypertensive gastropathy presence according to first and last endoscopic findings, varices eradication, rebleeding, recurrence and complication rates. Results: 181 patients were followed for 35.2± 25.6 (6-123) months. Varices eradication and recurrence rates were 93.6% and 44.7% for endoscopic sclerotherapy, and 90.3% and 47.2% for endoscopic band ligation (p>0.05). The number of sessions for eradication were 6.6±4.0 and 2.5±1.6 for endoscopic sclerotherapy and endoscopic band ligation groups, respectively (p<0.05). Rebleeding rates were 16.3% for endoscopic sclerotherapy and 6.1% for endoscopic band ligation (p>0.05). In the combined group, although the rebleeding rate was 34.4%, which was as expected significantly higher than that of endoscopic sclerotherapy and endoscopic band ligation, variceal eradication and the recurrence rates were 82.3% and 50.0%, similar to endoscopic sclerotherapy and endoscopic band ligation, and the number of sessions for eradication was 6.8±3.5. Conclusions: Endoscopic band ligation is the most suitable method for varices eradication, but there is a group of patients resistant to endoscopic band ligation. In this patient group, the addition of endoscopic sclerotherapy to endoscopic band ligation was a suitable and effective technique in order to achieve variceal eradication.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada özofagus varislerinin sekonder profilaksisinde endoskopik skleroterapi ve endoskopik band ligasyon tedavilerinin uzun dönem sonuçlarının karşılaştırılması yapıldı ve endoskopik band ligasyona resistan olgularda kombine tedavinin etkinliği değerlendiridi. Yöntem: Endoskopik skleroterapi (n=47 31E/16K, yaş=49.9±16.1yıl) ve endoskopik band ligasyon (n=72 56E/16K, yaş=46.6±14.1yıl) yapılan olgular eradikasyon, rekürrens, eradikasyon için gerekli seans sayısı ve tekrar kanama (rebleeding) oranları açısından karşılaştırıldı. Tek başına endoskopik band ligasyon ile varisleri eradike edilemeyen olgular, endoskopik skleroterapi ile kombine edildiklerinde (kombine grup, n=62 49E/13K, yaş=48.8±12.7 yıl) elde edilen oranlar da ayrıca değerlendirildiler. Hastalar ayrıca portal hipertansiyon etiyolojileri, child skorları, ilk ve son endoskopideki fundal varis-PHG bulguları ve komplikasyon oranları açı- sından karşılaştırıldırıldılar. Bulgular: 181 hasta ortalama 35.2± 25.6 (6-123) ay takip edildi. Varis eradikasyon oranları ve rekurrens oranları endoskopik skleroterapi için %93.6, %44..7, endoskopik band ligasyon için %90.3, %47.2 olarak bulundu (p>0.05). Eradikasyon için gereken seans sayısı endoskopik skleroterapi ve endoskopik band ligasyon için sırası ile 6.6±4.0, 2.5±1.6 (p 0.05). Kombine grup ayrıca değerlendirildi- ğinde tekrar kanama oranı beklenildiği üzere endoskopik skleroterapi ve endoskopik band ligasyon gruplarından daha fazla olmakla birlikte (%34.4) eradikasyon oranı ve rekürrens oranları endoskopik skleroterapi ve endoskopik band ligasyona benzer şekilde sırası ile %82.3, %50.0 ve eradikasyon için gerekli seans sayısı 6.8±3.5 olarak bulundu. Sonuç: Varis eradikasyonu için en uygun metod endoskopik band ligasyondur. Ancak endoskopik band ligasyona dirençli bir grup hasta vardır. Bu çalı şma sonucuna göre endoskopik band ligasyona resistan varis eradikasyonunda endoskopik skleroterapi ile kombine tedavinin etkin bir yöntem olduğunu düşünüyoruz.

🔖

Cite This Article

KURAN, S., OĞUZ, D., PARLAK, E., ASİL, M., ÇİÇEK, B., KILIÇ, M., DİŞİBEYAZ, S., ŞAHİN, B. (2006). Özofagus varislerinde sekonder profilaksi: Endoskopik skleroterapi, band ligasyonu ve kombine tedavi: Uzun dönem sonuçlar. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 2, 103–109. https://ajindex.com/articles/409996

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Sorbi D, Gostout CJ, Peura D, et al. An assessment of the management of acute bleeding varices: A multicenter prospective member-based study. Am J Gastroenterol 2003; 98: 2424-34
  2. Navarro VJ, Garsia-Tsao G. Variceal hemorrhage. Crit Care Clin 1995; 11: 391
  3. De Franchis R, Primignani M. Endoscopic treatments for portal hypertension. Baillierre’s Clin Gastroenterol 1997; 11: 289-309
  4. Franchis R, Primignani M. Why do varices bleed? Complication of cirrhosis. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 1992; 21: 85-101
  5. Gatta A, Merkel J, Amodio P, et al. Development and validation of a prognostic index predicting death after upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with liver cirrhosis. Am J Gastroenterol 1994; 89: 1528-36
  6. Comar KM, Sanyal AJ. Portal hypertensive bleeding. Gastroenterol Clin N Am 2003; 32: 1079-1105
  7. Schmitz RJ, Sharma P, Badr AS, et al. Incidence and management of esophageal stricture formation, ulcer bleeding, perforation and massive hematoma formation from sclerotherapy versus band ligation. Am J Gastroenterol 2001; 96: 438-41
  8. Garg PK, Josni YK, Tandon RK. Comparison of endoscopic variceal sclerotherapy with sequential endoscopic band ligation plus low dose sclerotherapy for secondary prophylaxis of variceal hemorrhage: A prospective randomized study. Gastrointest Endosc 1999; 50: 369-73
  9. Binmoeller KF, Borsatto R. Variceal bleeding and portal hypertension. Endoscopy 2000; 32: 189-99
  10. Johnson D. World literature review: Esophageal variceal sclerotherapy or band ligation: Is two better than one?. Am J Gastroenterol 1997; 92: 1394-5
  11. Japanese Reserch Society of Portal Hypertension. The general rules recording endoscopic findings of esophageal varices. Jpn J Surg 1980; 10: 84-7
  12. Sarıtas U, Parlak E, Alt›ntas E, Sahin B. Comparison of single and multiband systems in the management of esophageal varices. Turk J Gastroenterol 2004; 15: 27-33
  13. Bohnacker S, Sriram PVJ, Soehendra N. The role of endoscopic therapy in the treatment of bleeding varices. Baillierre’s Best Pract Rest Clin Gastroenterol 2000; 14: 477-94
  14. Laine L, Stein C, Sharma V. Randomized comparison of ligation versus ligation plus sclerotherapy in patients with bleeding esophageal varices. Gastroenterology 1996; 110: 635-8
  15. Saeed ZA, Stiegmann GV, Ramirez F, et al. Endoscopic variceal ligation is superior to combined ligation and sclerotherapy for esophageal varices: A multicenter prospective randomized trial. Hepatology 1997; 25: 71-4