Journals / Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology / 2009 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 4

Kolonoskopi işlemi sedasyonunda midazolam ve midazolam/meperidin tedavilerinin kontrollü prospektif randomize karşılaştırılması

Sedation with midazolam versus midazolam plus meperidine for routine colonoscopy: A prospective, randomized, controlled study

Pages
271–275
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Although endoscopists favor the use of both medications together, adding meperidine to midazolam before the colonoscopy does not seem to have additive beneficial effect for the patients.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aims: The major goals of analgesia and sedation are to provide pain control and anxiolysis and to facilitate therapeutic and diagnostic interventions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: A total of 74 patients admitted for routine colonoscopy to our hospital between September 2008 and March 2009 were eligible for the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Although endoscopists favor the use of both medications together, adding meperidine to midazolam before the colonoscopy does not seem to have additive beneficial effect for the patients.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Kan basıncı · Kolonoskopi · İlaç tedavisi

Abstract

Background/aims: The major goals of analgesia and sedation are to provide pain control and anxiolysis and to facilitate therapeutic and diagnostic interventions. A combination of midazolam and an opioid is usually administered to achieve sedation and analgesia during colonoscopy. However, the value of adding analgesics to sedative agents has not been well evaluated. In this study, we compared the efficacy and safety of midazolam versus midazolam plus meperidine for colonoscopy. Methods: A total of 74 patients admitted for routine colonoscopy to our hospital between September 2008 and March 2009 were eligible for the study. The midazolam group received midazolam (n=34) and the midazolam/meperidine group received midazolam plus meperidine (n=40). Data regarding the procedure times, degree of pain (determined according to the standard visual analog scales and recovery time were collected. Results: There was no significant difference between the two groups with regard to the rate of inadequate bowel preparation. Mean visual analog scales scores were over three points and similar in the two groups. Recovery times (in minutes) were similar in the two groups (28.2 min, SD 5.3 for the midazolam/meperidine sedation group and 28.3 min, SD 5.4 for the midazolam group). The total procedure times were also similar in the two groups (mean 18.64 min, SD 6.7 vs 19.3 min, SD 10.1). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding the recovery time, procedures times and visual analog scales mean scores. Conclusions: Patient safety, outcomes, and satisfaction are similar in colonoscopy procedures performed under sedation protocols using either midazolam and meperidine or midazolam alone. Although endoscopists favor the use of both medications together, adding meperidine to midazolam before the colonoscopy does not seem to have additive beneficial effect for the patients.

Özet

Amaç: Analjezi ve sedasyon, kolonoskopi işleminde ağrı kontrolünü sağlar ve anksiyolitik etki gösterir. Böylece tanı ve tedavi amaçlı kolonoskopi işleminin yapılması kolaylaşır. Midazolam ve opioid bileşiklerinin kombinasyonu kolonoskopi işleminde sedasyon ve analjezi sağlama amacı ile sıklıkla kullanılır. Bununla beraber kolonoskopi işleminde sedatiflere opioid analjeziklerin eklenmesinin etkisi iyi araştırılmamıştır. Bu çalışmada kolonoskopi işleminde sedasyon ve analjezi sağlama etkisi açısından midazolam ve midazolam/meperidin kombinasyonlarını karşılaştırdık. Yöntem: Hastanemizde Ekim 2008 ile Mart 2009 tarihleri arasında rutin kolonoskopi işlemi yapılan toplam 74 hasta değerlendirildi. Midazolam grubunda 34 hasta ve midazolam/meperidin grubunda 40 hasta vardı. Tüm hastalarda standart görsel analog ölçeklerine göre ağrı derecesi, işlem süresi ve toparlanma zamanları değerlendirildi. Bulgular: İki grup arasında barsak temizliği kalitesi açısından anlamlı fark saptanmadı. Tüm hastalarda ortalama VAS skoru üçün üzerinde olup her iki grupta benzerdi. Toparlanma zamanı meperidin grubunda (28.2 dk, SD 5.3), midazolam/meperidin grubunda 28.3 dk idi. SD 5.4 olup iki grup arasında fark yoktu. Ayrıca her iki grupta toplam işlem süresi benzerdi (ort. 18.64 dk, SD 6.7 vs 19.3 dk, SD 10.1. Her iki grup arasında toparlanma zamanı, ortalama VAS skoru ve işlem süresi açısından istatistiksel fark yoktu. Sonuç: Her iki grupta kolonoskopi işleminin başarısı, işlem güvenirliliği ve hasta memnuniyeti benzerdi. Klinik uygulamada endoskopistlerin çoğunun midazolam ile birlikte opioid analjezik kullanma alışkanlığı olsa da, meperidinin midazolama eklenmesinin ek bir yarar sağladığı gösterilemedi.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇINAR, K., YAKUT, M., ÖZDEN, A. (2009). Kolonoskopi işlemi sedasyonunda midazolam ve midazolam/meperidin tedavilerinin kontrollü prospektif randomize karşılaştırılması. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 4, 271–275. https://ajindex.com/articles/409823

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Tonner PH, Weiler N. Sedation and analgesia in the intensive care unit. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2003; 16: 113-21
  2. Onhaus EE, Adler R. Methodological problems in the measurement of pain: a comparison between the verbal rating scale and the visual analogue scale. Pain 1975; 1: 379-84
  3. Muellejans E, Matthey T, Scholpp J, Schill M. Sedation in the intensive care unit with remifentanil/propofol versus midazolam/fentanyl: a randomised, open-label, pharmacoeconomic trial. Crit Care 2006; 10: R91
  4. Riphaus A, Stergiou N, Wehrmann T. Sedation with propofol for routine ERCP in high-risk octogenarians: a randomized, controlled study. Am J Gastroenterol 2005; 100: 1957- 63
  5. Hookey LC, Depew WT, Vanner S. The safety profile of oral sodium phosphate for colonic cleansing before colonoscopy in adults. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 56: 895-902
  6. Lazzaroni M, Bianchi Porro G. Preparation, premedication and surveillance. Endoscopy. 2003 Feb; 35: 103-11
  7. Bell GD. Preparation, premedication, and surveillance. Endoscopy 2004; 36: 23-31
  8. Sebel PS. Propofol: a new intravenous anaesthetic. Anaesthesiology 1989; 71: 260-77
  9. Searle NR, Sahab P. Propofol in patients with cardiac disease. Can J Anaesth 1993; 40: 816-8
  10. Daneshmed TK, Bell GD. Sedation for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: results of a nationwide survey. Gut 1991; 32: 12-5
  11. Keefe EB, Connor KW. 1989 ASGE survey of endoscopic sedation and monitoring practices. Gastrointest Endosc 1990; 36: 13-8
  12. McCloy, R, Nagengast, F, Fried, M, et al. Conscious sedation for endoscopy. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1996; 8: 1233-1234
  13. Baudet JS, Borque P, Borja E, et al. Use of sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy: a nationwide survey in Spain. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009; 21: 882-8
  14. Lazzaroni M, Bianchi Porro G. Preparation, premedication and surveillance. Endoscopy 1998; 30: 53-60
  15. Reves JG, Fragen RJ, Vinik R, et al. Midazolam: pharmacology and uses. Anaesthesiology 1985; 62: 310-24
  16. Diab FH, Kinf PD, Barthel JS, et al. Efficacy and safety of combined meperidine and midazolam for EGD sedation compared with midazolam alone. Am J Gastroenterol 1996; 91: 1120-5
  17. Kostash MA, Johnston R, Bailey RJ, et al. Sedation for colonoscopy: a double blind comparison of diazepam/meperidine, midazolam/fentanyl and propofol/fentanyl combinations. Can J Gastroenterol 1994; 8: 27-31
  18. Hayee B, Dunn J, Loganayagam A, et al. Midazolam with meperidine or fentanyl for colonoscopy: results of a ran