Journals / Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology / 2014 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 5

The efficacy of diffusion weighted imaging for detection of acute pancreatitis and comparison of subgroups according to Balthazar classification

Pages
553–557
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Due to the lack of CT findings in grade A patients, DWI may be helpful in the diagnosis in this group as well.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/Aims: The aim of this study was to measure the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values detected by diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in acute pancreatitis and compare them with computerized tomography (CT) findings in acute pancreatitis subgrouped by the Balthazar classification.Materials and Methods: The study population included 50 patients diagnosed with clinical pancreatitis who were evaluated with both multidetector CT and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) within 24 h of clinical presentation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We calculated pancreatic ADC values obtained from DWI (b=0 and b=1000 mm2/sn).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Due to the lack of CT findings in grade A patients, DWI may be helpful in the diagnosis in this group as well.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Background/Aims: The aim of this study was to measure the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values detected by diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in acute pancreatitis and compare them with computerized tomography (CT) findings in acute pancreatitis subgrouped by the Balthazar classification.Materials and Methods: The study population included 50 patients diagnosed with clinical pancreatitis who were evaluated with both multidetector CT and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) within 24 h of clinical presentation. We calculated pancreatic ADC values obtained from DWI (b=0 and b=1000 mm2/sn). These values were compared with their normal counterparts (n=24). The patients with acute pancreatitis were subgrouped according to the Balthazar classification. The mean ADC values were calculated in each subgroup, and they were compared with control ADC values. Results: The mean pancreatic ADC values in acute pancreatitis (1.19×10-3 mm2/sn ±0.32) was significantly lower than in the normal group (1.78×10-3 mm2/sn ±0.29) (p<0.001). In the subgroup analysis, ADC values in each group were significantly lower than in the control group (p<0.001). In addition, as severity of pancreatitis increased according to the Balthazar classification, lower ADC values were noted. Conclusion: DWI with MRI and ADC values are helpful in the diagnosis of all subgroups of acute pancreatitis. Due to the lack of CT findings in grade A patients, DWI may be helpful in the diagnosis in this group as well.

🔖

Cite This Article

YENCİLEK, E., TELLİ, S., TEKEŞİN, K., ÖZGÜR, A., ÇAKIR, Ö., TÜRKOĞLU, Ö., MERİÇ, K., ŞİMŞEK, M. (2014). The efficacy of diffusion weighted imaging for detection of acute pancreatitis and comparison of subgroups according to Balthazar classification. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 5, 553–557. https://ajindex.com/articles/409546

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Isenmann R, Beger HG. Natural history of acute pancreatitis and the role of infection. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 1999; 13: 291-301.
  2. Papachristou GI, Clermont G, Sharma A, Yadav D, Whitcomb DC. Risk and markers of severe acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2007; 36: 277-96.
  3. Balthazar EJ, Robinson DL, Megibow AJ, Ranson JH. Acute pancre- atitis: Value of CT in establishing prognosis. Radiology 1990; 174: 331-6.
  4. Bozgeyik Z, Kocakoc E, Sonmezgoz F. Diffusion-weighted MR im- aging findings of kidneys in patients with early phase of obstruc- tion. Eur J Radiol 2009; 70: 138-41.
  5. Steinberg W, Tenner S. Acute pancreatitis. N Engl J Med 1994; 330: 1198-210.
  6. Isenmann R, Beger HG. Natural history of acute pancreatitis and the role of infection. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 1999; 13: 291-301.
  7. Kemppainen EA, Hedstrom JI, Puolakkainen PA, et al. Rapid mea- surement of urinary trypsinogen-2 as a screening test for acute pancreatitis. N Engl J Med 1997; 336: 1788-93.
  8. Malfertheinre P, Kemmer TP. Clinical picture and diagnosis of acute pancreatitis. Hepatogastroenterology 1991; 38: 97-100.
  9. Balthazar EJ, Freeny PC, vanSonnenberg E. Imaging and interven- tion in acute pancreatitis. Radiology 1994; 193: 297-306.
  10. Mortele KJ, Wiesner W, Intriere L, et al. A modified CT severity in- dex for evaluating acute pancreatitis: Improved correlation with patient outcome. Am J Roentgenol 2004; 183: 1261-5.
  11. Chan JH, TsuiEY, Luk SH, et al. MRdiffusion-weighted imaging of kidney: differentiation between hydronephrosis and pyonephro- sis. Clin Imaging 2001; 25: 110-3.
  12. Müller MF, Prasad PV, Bimmler D, Kaiser A, Edelman RR. Functional imaging of the kidney by means of measurement of the apparent diffusion coefficient. Radiology 1994; 193: 711-5.
  13. Laissy JP, Menegazzo D, Dumont E, et al. Hemodynamic effect of iodinated high-viscosity contrast medium in the rat kidney. Invest Radiol 2000; 35: 647-52.
  14. Le Bihan D, Breton E, Lallemand D, Aubin ML, Vignaud J, Laval- Jeantet M. Separation of diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel in- coherent motion MR imaging. Radiology 1988; 168: 497-505.
  15. Yablonskiy DA, Bretthorst GL, Ackerman JJ. Statistical model for diffusion attenuated MR signal. Magn Reson Med 2003; 50: 664-9.
  16. Yamada I, Aung W, Himeno Y, Nakagawa T, Shibuya H. Diffusion coefficients in abdominal organs and hepatic lesions: evaluation with intravoxel incoherent motion echo-planar MR imaging. Ra- diology 1999; 210: 617-23.
  17. Le Bihan D, Delannoy J, Levin RL. Tempera