Journals / Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology / 2015 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 3

A comparative analysis of colonoscopy findings in a Chinese and American tertiary hospital

Pages
263–269
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Chinese patients lacked awareness of colonoscopy screening and should be enhanced aged 50 years old or older, because the prevalence of advanced neoplasia was increased in this age group in both groups.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/Aims: To compare the colonoscopy findings of a tertiary Chinese hospital with those of an American tertiary hospital.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: Hundred consecutive colonoscopies performed in August 2008 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University in China and at the Emory University Hospital, United States of America, were investigated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Chinese patients lacked awareness of colonoscopy screening and should be enhanced aged 50 years old or older, because the prevalence of advanced neoplasia was increased in this age group in both groups.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Background/Aims: To compare the colonoscopy findings of a tertiary Chinese hospital with those of an American tertiary hospital. Materials and Methods: Hundred consecutive colonoscopies performed in August 2008 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University in China and at the Emory University Hospital, United States of America, were investigated. The endoscopic findings and the histopathology results were statistically compared. Results: The average age of Chinese patients who underwent colonoscopy in this study was 45.23±15.38 years, whereas that of American patients was 55.38±12.11 years; no difference in sex ratio was observed (p=0.202) be- tween the two populations. Screening colonoscopy accounted for 38% of patients in the American group and zero patients in the Chinese group. Polyps and diverticula were the most common findings in both groups. Abnormal findings in the American patients were three times higher than those in the Chinese patients. Proximal colon pol- yps were more common in the American group. Conversely, proximal colon diverticula were more common in the Chinese group. The prevalence of non-neoplasm lesions was not different between the two groups (p=0.232); the prevalence of adenomas significantly increased in patients who were more than 50 years old in both groups and was higher in the American group (p=0.038). Conclusion: The prevalence of bowel diseases in American patients was higher than that in Chinese patients. Polyps and diverticula were the main bowel abnormalities in both groups. Chinese patients lacked awareness of colonoscopy screening and should be enhanced aged 50 years old or older, because the prevalence of advanced neoplasia was increased in this age group in both groups.

🔖

Cite This Article

WANG, H., CAİ, Q., SHU, H. T., LV, N. H., ZHU, X. (2015). A comparative analysis of colonoscopy findings in a Chinese and American tertiary hospital. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 3, 263–269. https://ajindex.com/articles/409392

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics for Hispanics/ Latinos, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 2012; 62: 10-29. [CrossRef] Yang L, Parkin DM, Li LD, Chen YD, Bray F. Estimation and pro- jection of the national profile of cancer mortality in China: 1991- 2005. Br J Cancer 2004; 90: 2157-66. [CrossRef] Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, et al. Screening and surveil- lance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenoma- tous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. CA Cancer J Clin 2008; 58: 130-60. [CrossRef] Qaseem A, Denberg TD, Hopkins RH Jr, et al. Screening for colorectal cancer: a guidance statement from the American Col- lege of Physicians. Ann Intern Med 2012; 156: 378-86. [CrossRef] Ma GX, Shive SE, Wang MQ, Tan Y. Cancer screening behaviors and barri- ers in Asian Americans. Am J Health Behav 2009; 33: 650-60. [ CrossRef] Cai SR, Zhang SZ, Zhou L, et al. Population-based colorectal can- cer screening in Hangzhou city. Shiyong Zhongliuxue Zazhi 2006; 21: 177-8.
  2. Chen CD, Yen MF, Wang WM, Wong JM, Chen TH. A-case-cohort study for the disease natural history of adenoma-carcinoma and de novo carcinoma and surveillance of colon and rectum after polypectomy: implication for efficacy of colonoscopy. Br J Can- cer 2003; 88: 1866-73. [CrossRef] Lau PC, Sung JJ. Flat adenoma in colon: two decades of debate. J Dig Dis 2010; 11: 201-7. [CrossRef] Lieberman D. Nonpolypoid colorectal neoplasia in the United States: the parachute is open. JAMA 2008; 299: 1068-9. [CrossRef] Parra-Blanco A, Gimeno-García AZ, Nicolás-Pérez D, et al. Risk for high-grade dysplasia or invasive carcinoma in colorectal flat adeno- mas in a Spanish population. Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006; 29: 602-9. [CrossRef] Bianco MA, Cipolletta L, Rotondano G, et al. Prevalence of nonpol- ypoid colorectal neoplasia: an Italian multicenter observational study. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 279-85. [CrossRef] 12. Diamond SJ, Enestvedt BK, Jiang Z, et al. Adenoma detection rate increases with each decade of life after 50 years of age. Gastroin- test Endosc 2011; 74: 135-40. [CrossRef] 13. Lee CS, Ronan L, O’Morain C, McNamara D. Screening for colorec- tal cancer: what fits best? Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 6: 301-12. [CrossRef] 14. Graser A, Stieber P, Nagel D, et al. Comparison of CT colonogra- phy, colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy and faecal occ