Journals / Atmospheric Pollution Research / 2019 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 3

Estimating stomatal conductance and partitioning total ozone uptake over a winter wheat field

Pages
904–912
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results suggest that the proposed modelling upscaling method could be considered as a tool for ozone uptake estimation over the winter wheat field.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Winter wheat is widely cultivated in Eastern China, but subject to high-level surface ozone exposure.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We used an eddy-covariance technique and portable ozone exchange chambers to characterize water vapour flux, CO2 flux, and total ozone uptake in an agrometeorological experimental field station in Eastern China.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results suggest that the proposed modelling upscaling method could be considered as a tool for ozone uptake estimation over the winter wheat field.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Winter wheat is widely cultivated in Eastern China, but subject to high-level surface ozone exposure. To evaluate the impact of ozone on winter wheat, it is necessary to determine the amount of ozone absorbed via the stomata. The goal of this study was to estimate stomatal conductance and investigate the contribution of stomatal ozone uptake over a winter wheat field during a growing season. We used an eddy-covariance technique and portable ozone exchange chambers to characterize water vapour flux, CO2 flux, and total ozone uptake in an agrometeorological experimental field station in Eastern China. To estimate stomatal conductance of ozone in winter wheat at canopy level, we compared two existing approaches: 1) integrating the Penman-Monteith equation and gross primary production (GPP); and 2) upscaling the modelling results from a parameterized Jarvis-type leaf stomatal conductance model. The results revealed that both methods were capable of quantifying stomatal ozone conductance, but the latter produced a slightly more accurate result. Model results were thus used to simulate stomatal ozone uptake and to partition total ozone uptake into different pathways. The diurnal mean total ozone uptake was found to vary from 4.1 to 7.4 nmolm−2·s−1, and the stomatal ozone uptake varied from 0.42 to 1.75 nmolm−2·s−1 over the growing season. Stomatal ozone uptake accounted for 9–26% of total ozone uptake in the winter wheat. The results suggest that the proposed modelling upscaling method could be considered as a tool for ozone uptake estimation over the winter wheat field.

🔖

Cite This Article

XU, J., ZHENG, Y., HE, Y., ZHU, F., MAİ, B., WANG, S. Y., ZHANG, M., ZHAO, X., WANG, L., XU, L., DİNG, L., GUO, Z. (2019). Estimating stomatal conductance and partitioning total ozone uptake over a winter wheat field. Atmospheric Pollution Research, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 3, 904–912. https://ajindex.com/articles/193515

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. AmeriFlux, 2002. 1st QA/QC Workshop for Eddy-Covariance Measurements. Thurnau. Altimir, N., Vesala, T., Keronen, P., Kulmala, M., Hari, P., 2002. Methodology for direct field measurements of ozone flux to foliage with shoot chambers. Atmos. Environ. 36, 19–29.
  2. Altimir, N., Kolari, P., Tuovinen, J.-P., Vesala, T., Back, J., Suni, T., Kulmala, M., Hari, P., 2006. Foliage surface ozone deposition: a role for surface moisture? Biogeosciences 3, 209–228.
  3. Altimir, N., Tuovinen, J.P., Vesala, T., Kulmala, M., Hari, P., 2004. Measurements of ozone removal by Scots pine shoots: calibration of a stomatal uptake model including the non-stomatal component. Atmos. Environ. 38, 2387–2398.
  4. Amiro, A.D., Gillespie, T.J., Thurtell, G.W., 1984. Injury response of Phaseolus vulgaris to ozone flux density. Atmos. Environ. 18 (6), 1207–1215.
  5. Ashmore, M., Toet, S., Emberson, L., 2006. Ozone-a significant threat to future world food production. New Phytol. 170, 201–204.
  6. Avnery, S., Mauzerall, D.L., Liu, J., Horowitz, L.W., 2011. Global crop yield reductions due to surface ozone exposure: 1. Year 2000 crop production losses and economic damage. Atmos. Environ. 45, 2284–2296.
  7. Baldocchi, D.D., Meyers, T.P., 1991. Trace gas exchange above the floor of a deciduous forest. 1. Evaporation and CO2 efflux. J. Geophys. Res. 96 (D4), 7271–7285. Bičárová, S., Sitková, Z., Pavlendová Jr., H., Fleischer, P., et al., 2018. The role of environmental factions in ozone uptake of pinus mugo Turra. Atmos. Pollut. Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2018.08.003.
  8. Cieslik, S., 2009. Ozone flux over various plant ecosystems in Italy: a review. Environ. Pollut. 157, 1487–1496.
  9. Coyle, M., Nemitz, E., Storeton-West, R., Fowler, D., Cape, J.N., 2009. Measurements of ozone deposition to a potato canopy. Agric. For. Meteorol. 149, 655–666.
  10. De Marco, A., Sicard, P., Fares, S., Tuovinen, J.-P., Anav, A., Paoletti, E., 2016. Assessing the role of soil water limitation in determining the Phytotoxic Ozone Dose (PODY) thresholds. Atmos. Environ. 147, 88–97.
  11. Dufour, G., Eremenko, M., Orphal, J., Flaud, J.M., 2010. IASI observations of seasonal and day-to-day variations of tropospheric ozone over three highly populated areas of China: Beijing, Shanghai, and Hong Kong. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 10 (8), 3787–3801.
  12. Ennis, C.A., Lazrus, A.L., Kok, G.I., Zimmerman, P.R., Monson, R.K., 1990. A branch chamber system and techniques for simultaneous pollutant exposure experiments and gaseous flux determinations. Tellus B 42, 170–18