Journals / Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology / 2021 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 2

Real-World Data from Turkey: Is Sofosbuvir/Ledipasvir With or Without Ribavirin Treatment for Chronic Hepatitis C Really Effective?

Pages
155–163
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

HCV GT2 patients should be treated with more efficacious treatment.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background: In this study, we aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of sofosbuvir-based therapies in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C in real-world clinical practice.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Data from patients with chronic hepatitis C treated with SOF/LDV ± RBV or SOF/RBV in 31 centers across Turkey between April 1, 2017, and August 31, 2018, were recorded in a nationwide database among infectious disease specialists.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:HCV GT2 patients should be treated with more efficacious treatment.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Background: In this study, we aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of sofosbuvir-based therapies in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C in real-world clinical practice. Methods: Data from patients with chronic hepatitis C treated with SOF/LDV ± RBV or SOF/RBV in 31 centers across Turkey between April 1, 2017, and August 31, 2018, were recorded in a nationwide database among infectious disease specialists. Demographics, clinical, and virological outcomes were analyzed. Results: A total of 552 patients were included in the study. The mean age of the patients was 51.28 ± 14.2, and 293 (55.8%) were female. The majority had HCV genotype 1b infection (65%), 75.04% of the patients underwent treatment, and non-cirrhosis was present at baseline in 381 patients (72.6%). SOF/LDV ± RBV treatment was given to 477 patients and 48 patients received SOF/RBV according to HCV genotype. The total SVR12 rate was 99% in all patients. Five patients experienced disease relapse during the study and all of them were genotype 2. In patients infected with HCV GT2, SVR12 was 77.3%. SVR was 100% in all patients infected with other HCV genotypes. All treatments were well tolerated by patients without causing severe adverse events. Side effects and side effects-associated treatment discontinuation rates were 28.2% and 0.4%, respectively. Weakness (13.7%) was the common side effect. Conclusion: The present real-world data of 525 patients with HCV genotypes 1, 1a, 1b, 3, 4, and 5 who underwent SOF/LDV ± RBV treatment in Turkey demonstrated a high efficacy and safety profile. HCV GT2 patients should be treated with more efficacious treatment.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİRTÜRK, N., AYGEN, B., ÇELİK, İ., MISTIK, R., AKHAN, S., BARUT, Ş., URAL, O., BATIREL, A., ŞİMŞEK, F., ERSÖZ, G., İNAN, D., KINIKLI, S., TÜRKER, N., BİLGİN, H., GÜRBÜZ, Y., TÜLEK, N., TARAKÇI, H., YILDIZ, O., TÜRKOĞLU, E., GÜZEL, D. K., ŞİMŞEK, S., TUNA, N., Nazl, N. (2021). Real-World Data from Turkey: Is Sofosbuvir/Ledipasvir With or Without Ribavirin Treatment for Chronic Hepatitis C Really Effective?. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 2, 155–163. https://ajindex.com/articles/409180

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. World Health Organization. Guidelines for the Screening Care and Treatment of Persons with Hepatitis C Infection. Geneva: WHO; 2014
  2. World Health Organization. Guidelines for the Care and Treatment of Persons Diagnosed with Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infection. Geneva: WHO; 2018
  3. Gürbüz Y, Tülek NE, Tütüncü EE, et al. Evaluation of dual therapy in real life setting in treatment-naive Turkish patients with HCV infection: a multicenter, retrospective study. Balk Med J. 2016;33(1):18-26. [CrossRef] 4. Ahmed A, Felmlee DJ. Mechanisms of hepatitis C viral resistance to direct acting antivirals. Viruses. 2015;7(12):6716-6729. [CrossRef] 5. Afdhal N, Reddy KR, Nelson DR, et al. Ledipasvir and sofosbuvir for previously treated HCV genotype 1 infection. N Eng J Med. 2014;370(16):1483-1493. [CrossRef] 6. Buti M, Riveiro-Barciela M, Esteban R. Management of directacting antiviral agent failures. J Hepatol. 2015;63(6):1511-1522. [CrossRef] 7. Crespo J, Calleja JL, Fernández I, et al. Real-world effectiveness and safety of oral combination antiviral therapy for hepatitis C virus genotype 4 infection. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;15(6):945. e1-949.e1. [CrossRef] 8. Tapper EB, Bacon BR, Curry MP, et al. Real-world effectiveness for 12 weeks of ledipasvir-sofosbuvir for genotype 1 hepatitis C: the Trio Health Study. J Viral Hepat. 2017;24(1):22-27. [CrossRef] 9. European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL recommendations on treatment of hepatitis C 2015. J Hepatol. 2015;63(1):199- 236. [CrossRef] 10. European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL recommendations on treatment of hepatitis C 2015. J Hepatol. 2017;66:152-194
  4. Aygen B, Demirtürk N, Türker N, et al. Management of chronic hepatitis C virus infection: a consensus report of the study group for Viral Hepatitis of the Turkish Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Disease-2017 Update. KLİMİK J. 2017;30(1)(Suppl 1):2-36. [CrossRef] 12. European Association for the Study of the Liver, European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL recommendations on treatment of hepatitis C 2018. J Hepatol. 2018;69(2):461-511. [CrossRef] 13. Tao T, Jiang X, Chen Y, Song Y. Efficacy and safety of ledipasvir/ sofosbuvir with and without ribavirin in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection: a meta-analysis. Int J Infcet Dis. 2017;55:56-71. [CrossRef] 14. Calleja JL, Crespo J, Rincón D, et al. Effectiveness, safety and clinical outcomes of direct-acting antiviral thera