Journals / Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon / 2015 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 2

HEMİPARETİK SEREBRAL PALSİ Lİ ÇOCUKLARDA KAVRAMA TEMAS ALANININ STEREOLOJİK YÖNTEMLE BELİRLENMESİ

DETERMINATION OF GRIP CONTACT AREAS WITH STEREOLOGIC MEASUREMENT IN CHILDREN WITH HEMIPARETIC CEREBRAL PALSY

Pages
86–92
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The data gained from the study can guide rehabilitation efforts towards improving hand function.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: The aim of the study is to present a method used to estimate hand and finger contact areas on different sized objects and compare results of children with Cerebral Palsy (CP) with healthy peers.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: A total of 51 children, 26 with hemiparetic CP classified as I or II according to Manuel Ability Classification System and had 1 or 1+ level spasticity as to Modified Ashworth Scale and 25 healthy peers were included to the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The data gained from the study can guide rehabilitation efforts towards improving hand function.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the study is to present a method used to estimate hand and finger contact areas on different sized objects and compare results of children with Cerebral Palsy (CP) with healthy peers. Methods: A total of 51 children, 26 with hemiparetic CP classified as I or II according to Manuel Ability Classification System and had 1 or 1+ level spasticity as to Modified Ashworth Scale and 25 healthy peers were included to the study. The contact area was calculated by the Cavalieri principle of stereological estimation after children grasped cylindrical objects having diameters of 2.5, 4 and 5 cm. Results: The contact areas were found to be different at the thenar side for the grasped object with 2.5 cm diameter, and at the hypothenar side for the objects with 4 and 5 cm diameters (p<0.05). Discussion: Clinicians are more interested with thumb since the contribution of adductor spasticity in CP. However, hypothenar contribution should be also considered especially with objects having larger diameters. The data gained from the study can guide rehabilitation efforts towards improving hand function.

Özet

Amaç: Çalışmanın amacı farklı boyuttaki objelerde parmak ve el temas alanını hesaplamak için bir yöntem sunmak ve Serebral Palsili çocukların sonuçlarını sağlıklı grupla karşılaştırmaktır. Yöntemler: Manuel yetenek sınıflama sistemine göre I veya II kavrama seviyesi bulunan, Modifiye Ashworth Skalasına göre 1 ya da 1+ seviyelerinde spastisiteye sahip olan 26 hemiparetik Serebral Palsili ve 25 sağlıklı toplam 51 çocuk çalışmaya alınmıştır. Çapları 2,5, 4 ve 5 cm olan silindirik objeler çocuklar tarafından kavrandıktan sonra temas alanları Cavalieri prensibi stereolojik ölçüm yöntemi ile hesaplanmıştır. Sonuç: Kavrama temas alanı 2,5 cm çaplı obje üzerinde tenar bölgede, 4 ve 5 cm çaplı obje üzerinde ise hipotenar bolgede istatistiksel olarak farklı bulunmuştur (p<0.05). Tartışma: Klinisyenler Serebral palside adduktor spastisitesi nedeniyle baş parmakla daha fazla ilgilenmektedir. Buna karşın, özellikle büyük çaplı obje kavraması sırasında dikkat hipotenar bölgeye de verilmelidir. Çalışma ile elde edilen veriler el fonksiyonunu geliştirmede yol gösterebilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKEL, B. S., DEMİREL, A., BALTACI, G. (2015). HEMİPARETİK SEREBRAL PALSİ Lİ ÇOCUKLARDA KAVRAMA TEMAS ALANININ STEREOLOJİK YÖNTEMLE BELİRLENMESİ. Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 2, 86–92. https://ajindex.com/articles/409081

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Feltham MG, Ledebt A, Deconinck FJ, Savelsbergh GJ. Assessment of neuromuscular activation of the upper limbs in children with spastic hemiparetic cerebral palsy during a dynamical task. Journal of electromyography and kinesiology. 2010;20(3):448- 56
  2. Eliasson AC, Gordon AM, Forssberg H. Basic coordination of manipulative forces of children with cerebral palsy. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology. 1991;33(8):661-70
  3. Arner M, Eliasson A-C, Nicklasson S, Sommerstein K, Hägglund G. Hand function in cerebral palsy. Report of 367 children in a population-based longitudinal health care program. The Journal of hand surgery. 2008;33(8):1337-47
  4. Trombly CA. Deficits of reaching in subjects with left hemiparesis: a pilot study. American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 1992;46(10):887-97
  5. Steenbergen B, Meulenbroek RG, Rosenbaum DA. Constraints on grip selection in hemiparetic cerebral palsy: effects of lesional side, end-point accuracy, and context. Cognitive Brain Research. 2004;19(2):145-59
  6. Coluccini M, Maini ES, Martelloni C, Sgandurra G, Cioni G. Kinematic characterization of functional reach to grasp in normal and in motor disabled children. Gait & posture. 2007;25(4):493- 501
  7. Kreulen M, Smeulders M, Veeger H, Hage J. Movement patterns of the upper extremity and trunk associated with impaired fore- arm rotation in patients with hemiplegic cerebral palsy compared to healthy controls. Gait & posture. 2007;25(3):485-92
  8. Mackey AH, Walt SE, Lobb GA, Stott NS. Reliability of upper and lower limb three-dimensional kinematics in children with hemiplegia. Gait & posture. 2005;22(1):1-9
  9. Reid S, Elliott C, Alderson J, Lloyd D, Elliott B. Repeatability of upper limb kinematics for children with and without cerebral palsy. Gait & posture. 2010;32(1):10-7
  10. Jaspers E, Desloovere K, Bruyninckx H, Klingels K, Molenaers G, Aertbeliën E, et al. Three-dimensional upper limb movement characteristics in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy and typically developing children. Research in developmental disabilities. 2011;32(6):2283-94
  11. Jaspers E, Feys H, Bruyninckx H, Harlaar J, Molenaers G, Desloo-vere K. Upper limb kinematics: development and reliability of a clinical protocol for children. Gait & posture. 2011;33(2):279-85
  12. Rönnqvist L, Rösblad B. Kinematic analysis of unimanual reaching and grasping movements in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Clinical Biomechanics. 2007;22(2):165-75
  13. Wong YJ, Whishaw IQ. Precision gr