SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon / 2016 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 1

ATAKSİLİ HASTALARDA ÇİFT GÖREVİN KLİNİK DENGE PERFORMANSINA ETKİSİ ARAŞTIRMA MAKALESİ

THE EFFECT OF DUAL TASK ON CLINICAL BALANCE PERFORMANCE IN ATAXIA PATIENTS

Cevher S. DEMİRCİ
MUHAMMED KILINÇ
Sibel Aksu YILDIRIM
Pages
1–7
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These findings are considered to be useful while evaluating the balance function of the ataxic patients, and focus on the necessity of including concurrent tasks during the balance tests.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of concurrent cognitive and motor tasks on clinical balance performance of ataxic and healthy subjects.Methods: A total of 50 subjects with and without ataxia were included.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Timed performances during Single Leg Stance (OLS), Tandem Stance (TS), 360 degrees of Rotation, Timed Up & Go (TUG) and Four Square Step (FSS) tests were recorded without task, and with concurrent cognitive and motor tasks.Results: Ataxic and healthy subjects had similar SLS and TS test performances, applied with cognitive tasks.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These findings are considered to be useful while evaluating the balance function of the ataxic patients, and focus on the necessity of including concurrent tasks during the balance tests.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of concurrent cognitive and motor tasks on clinical balance performance of ataxic and healthy subjects.Methods: A total of 50 subjects with and without ataxia were included. Timed performances during Single Leg Stance (OLS), Tandem Stance (TS), 360 degrees of Rotation, Timed Up & Go (TUG) and Four Square Step (FSS) tests were recorded without task, and with concurrent cognitive and motor tasks.Results: Ataxic and healthy subjects had similar SLS and TS test performances, applied with cognitive tasks. Motor task negatively affected the performances of the ataxic patients. Motor and cognitive tasks during 360 DR and cognitive task during TUG tests reduced the performances of both groups. During FSS test, motor task reduced the performances of ataxic patients, while both tasks reduced the performances of the healthy subjects.Discussion: The results point out the effects of cognitive and motor tasks during static and dynamic balance tests in ataxic and healthy subjects. These findings are considered to be useful while evaluating the balance function of the ataxic patients, and focus on the necessity of including concurrent tasks during the balance tests.

Özet

Amaç: Çalışmanın amacı, ataksili ve sağlıklı olgularda ek bilişsel ve motor görevlerin klinik denge performansına etkisini araştırmaktır.Yöntem: Ataksi tanısı olan ve olmayan toplam 50 olgu çalışmaya alınmıştır. Tek ayak duruş, tandem duruş süreleri, 360 derece dönme, zamanlı kalk yürü ve dört kare adım testini tamamlama süreleri görevsiz, ek bilişsel görevle ve ek motor görevle tekrar edilerek süre kaydedilmiştir. Sonuçlar: Ataksili ve sağlıklı olguların bilişsel görev sırasındaki tek ayak duruş ve tandem duruş performansları benzerdir. Motor ek görev ataksili olguların test performanslarını olumsuz etkilemiştir. 360 derece dönme testi performansı her iki grupta da hem bilişsel hem motor görevlerden, zamanlı kalk yürü testi performansı her iki grupta da bilişsel görevlerden olumsuz etkilenmiştir. Dört kare adım testi performansı ise ataksili olgularda sadece motor ek görevlerden etkilenirken, sağlıklı olgularda hem motor hem bilişsel görevler sırasında anlamlı olarak bozulmuştur. Tartışma: Sonuç olarak; motor ve bilişsel görevler ataksili ve sağlıklı olguların statik ve dinamik denge testleri üzerine etkilidir. Bu sonuçlar ataksili hastaların denge fonksiyonlarının değerlendirilmesinde ek görevlerin kullanılmasının gerekliliğini göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİRCİ, C. S., KILINÇ, M., YILDIRIM, S. A. (2016). ATAKSİLİ HASTALARDA ÇİFT GÖREVİN KLİNİK DENGE PERFORMANSINA ETKİSİ ARAŞTIRMA MAKALESİ. Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 1, 1–7. https://ajindex.com/articles/409078

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Bradley WG. Neurology in Clinical Practice: The neurological disorders. 6th ed. Taylor & Francis; 2004.
  2. Woollacott M, Shumway-Cook A. Attention and the control of posture and gait: a review of an emerging area of research. Gait Posture. 2002;16(1):1-14.
  3. Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott MH. Motor control: translating research into clinical practice 2th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007.
  4. Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott M. Attentional demands and postural control: the effect of sensory context. J Gerontol A Bio Sci Med Sci. 2000;55(1):M10. Horak FB. Postural orientation and equilibrium: what do we need to know about neural control of balance to prevent falls? Age Ageing. 2006;35(suppl 2):ii7-ii11. Sala SD, Baddeley A, Papagno C, Spinnler H. Dual-task paradigm: a means to examine the central executive. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1995;769(1):161-72.
  5. O'Shea S, Morris ME, Iansek R. Dual task interference during gait in people with Parkinson disease: effects of motor versus cognitive secondary tasks. Phys Ther. 2002;82(9):888-97.
  6. Huang H-J, Mercer VS. Dual-task methodology: applications in studies of cognitive and motor performance in adults and children. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2001;13(3):133-40.
  7. Yogev-Seligmann G, Hausdorff JM, Giladi N. The role of executive function and attention in gait. Mov Disord. 2008;23(3):329-42
  8. Pettersson AF, Olsson E, Wahlund L-O. Effect of divided attention on gait in subjects with and without cognitive impairment. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2007;20(1):58-62. Canning CG. The effect of directing attention during walking under dual-task conditions in Parkinson's disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2005;11(2):95-9.
  9. Bowen A, Wenman R, Mickelborough J, Foster J, Hill E, Tallis R. Dual-task effects of talking while walking on velocity and balance following a stroke. Age Ageing. 2001;30(4):319-23. McCulloch K. Attention and dual-task conditions: physical therapy implications for individuals with acquired brain injury. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2007;31(3):104-18.
  10. Wu T, Liu J, Hallett M, Zheng Z, Chan P. Cerebellum and integration of neural networks in dual-task processing. Neuroimage. 2013;65:466-75.
  11. Yang Y-R, Wang R-Y, Chen Y-C, Kao M-J. Dual-Task Exercise Improves Walking Ability in Chronic Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88. Klockgether T, Lüdtke R, Kramer B, Abele M, Bürk K, Schöls L, et al. The natural history of degenerative ataxia: a retrospective study in 466 patients. Brain. 1998;121(4):589-600.
  12. Folstein MF, Folstein SE,