Journals / Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology / 2019 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 9

Can a 1-day clear liquid diet with a split -dose polyethylene glycol overcome conventional practice patterns during the preparation for screening colonoscopy?

Pages
817–825
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Gastric fullness and nausea/vomiting were pointed out much more, especially inthe SF-PEG-ELS users (p=0.008 and p=0.004, respectively).Conclusion: A 1-day CLD was not inferior to a 3-day CMD for colonoscopy preparation in terms of bowel cleaning, the polyp detectionrate, and patient tolerance.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/Aims: A successful screening colonoscopy is closely linked to the quality of a bowel preparation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, we aimed todetermine the impact of a 1-day clear liquid diet (CLD) compared to a 3-day combined diet (CMD) accompanied by a split-dose regimenof polyethylene glycol and electrolyte lavage solution (PEG-ELS) for screening colonoscopy.Materials and Methods: This was a prospective, randomized, endoscopist-blinded study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Gastric fullness and nausea/vomiting were pointed out much more, especially inthe SF-PEG-ELS users (p=0.008 and p=0.004, respectively).Conclusion: A 1-day CLD was not inferior to a 3-day CMD for colonoscopy preparation in terms of bowel cleaning, the polyp detectionrate, and patient tolerance.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Background/Aims: A successful screening colonoscopy is closely linked to the quality of a bowel preparation. In this study, we aimed todetermine the impact of a 1-day clear liquid diet (CLD) compared to a 3-day combined diet (CMD) accompanied by a split-dose regimenof polyethylene glycol and electrolyte lavage solution (PEG-ELS) for screening colonoscopy.Materials and Methods: This was a prospective, randomized, endoscopist-blinded study. Patients referred for screening colonoscopywere randomized to four groups as a 1-day CLD+PEG-ELS vs. a 1-day CLD+sulfate free (SF)-PEG-ELS and a 3-day CMD+PEG-ELS vs. a3-day CMD+SF-PEG-ELS. An assessment of the quality of colon cleaning, tolerability to the preparation, and symptoms related to thepreparation were recorded.Results: A total of 506 patients were enrolled in this study. The quality of bowel preparation was significantly inferior in the CMD+PEG-ELS group than CLD+PEG-ELS (p=0.004) and CMD+SF-PEG-ELS groups (p=0.007). There were no statistical differences amongthe groups in terms of the polyp detection rate. With respect to an easy rating of diet following and the consumption of laxative, therewere no significant differences among the four groups. Gastric fullness and nausea/vomiting were pointed out much more, especially inthe SF-PEG-ELS users (p=0.008 and p=0.004, respectively).Conclusion: A 1-day CLD was not inferior to a 3-day CMD for colonoscopy preparation in terms of bowel cleaning, the polyp detectionrate, and patient tolerance.

🔖

Cite This Article

ETİK, D. Ö., SUNA, N., GÜNDÜZ, C., BOSTAN, A., ÖZDEMİR, A., GÜREL, B. Y., YENİŞEKERCİ, E., BOYACIOĞLU, A. S. (2019). Can a 1-day clear liquid diet with a split -dose polyethylene glycol overcome conventional practice patterns during the preparation for screening colonoscopy?. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 9, 817–825. https://ajindex.com/articles/408776

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Murphy CC, Sandler RS, Sanoff HK, Yang YC, Lund JL, Baron JA. Decrease in incidence of colorectal cancer among individuals 50 years or older after recommendations for population-based screening. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017
  2. [CrossRef] 2. Rex DK, Schoenfeld PS, Cohen J, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2015
  3. [CrossRef] 3. Harrison NM, Hjelkrem MC. Bowel cleansing before colonoscopy: Balancing efficacy, safety, cost and patient tolerance. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2016
  4. [CrossRef] 4. Kaminski MF, Thomas –Gibson S, Bugajski M et al. Performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative. Endoscopy 2017
  5. [CrossRef] 5. Mahmood S, Farooqui SM, Madhoun MF. Predictors of inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018
  6. [CrossRef] 6. Martens P, Bisschops R. Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: efficacy, tolerability and safety. Acta Gastroenterol Belg 2014
  7. Lebwohl B, Kastrinos F, Glick M, Rosenbaum AJ, Wang T, Neugut AI. The impact of suboptimal bowel preparation on adenoma miss rates and the factors associated with early repeat colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2011
  8. [CrossRef] 8. Leszczynski AM, MacArthur KL, Nelson KP, Schueler SA, Quatromoni PA, Jacobson BC. The association among diet, dietary fiber, and bowel preparation at colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2018
  9. [CrossRef] 9. Parekh PJ, Oldfield EC, Johnson DA. Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: what is best and necessary for quality? Curr Opin Gastroenterol 2019
  10. [CrossRef] 10. Hassan C, Bretthauer M, Kaminski MF, et al. Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy 2013
  11. [CrossRef] 11. Johnson DA, Barkun AN, Cohen LB, et al. Optimizing Adequacy of Bowel Cleansing for Colonoscopy: Recommendations From the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology 2014
  12. [CrossRef] 12. Patel M, Staggs E, Thomas CS, Lukens F, Wallace M, Almansa C. Development and validation of the Mayo Clinic Bowel Prep Tolerability Questionnaire. Dig Liver Dis 2014
  13. [CrossRef] 13. Lai EJ, Calderwood AH, Doros G, Fix OK, Jacobson BC. The Boston bowel preparation scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented