Journals / Endoskopi / 2018 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 1

Bleeding after endoscopic sphincterotomy: A single-center retrospective study

Endoskopik sfinkterotomi sonrası kanama: Tek merkezli retrospektif çalışma

Journal
Endoskopi
Pages
1–5
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Our study also demonstrates the importance of early diagnosis and prompt treatment of this complication.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background and Aims: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is an effective diagnostic and therapeutic method; however, its invasive nature can lead to serious complications, including bleeding.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The primary aim of this retrospective study, which was performed in a tertiary reference center, was to demonstrate the frequency, severity, and types of post-endoscopic sphincterotomy bleeding, identify the risk factors of post-endoscopic sphinc-terotomy bleeding, and determine the appropriate treatments for these pa-tients.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Our study also demonstrates the importance of early diagnosis and prompt treatment of this complication.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background and Aims: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is an effective diagnostic and therapeutic method; however, its invasive nature can lead to serious complications, including bleeding. The primary aim of this retrospective study, which was performed in a tertiary reference center, was to demonstrate the frequency, severity, and types of post-endoscopic sphincterotomy bleeding, identify the risk factors of post-endoscopic sphinc-terotomy bleeding, and determine the appropriate treatments for these pa-tients. Material and Methods: Medical information on patients treated with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography between February 2008 and April 2013 was examined retrospectively. In this period, a total of 12,893 patients were detected; 6552 of them had no previous endoscopic retro-grade cholangiopancreatography history. Patients with bleeding after endo-scopic sphincterotomy were included in the study. Results: The frequency of bleeding after endoscopic sphincterotomy was 1.23% (81 patients). The mean patient age was 64.9 (18–89) years, 46 patients were women (56.8%), and 35 patients were men (43.2%). Immediate bleeding was observed in 50 (61.7%) patients, and delayed bleeding was observed in 31 (38.3%) pa-tients. Most bleeding episodes were mild (53 patients, 65.4%), moderate bleeding was seen in 21 patients (25.9%), and severe bleeding was seen in 7 (8.6%) patients. Epinephrine injection alone was the most frequent treat-ment method (41 patients, 50.6%), followed by epinephrine injection plus heater probe (25 patients, 30.8%), heater probe alone (7 patients, 8.6%), epinephrine injection plus balloon tamponade (3 patients, 3.7%), balloon tamponade alone (2 patients, 2.4%), self-expandable full covered metal stent (2 patients, 2.4%), and endoclips alone (1 patient, 1.2%). These patients did not require surgery, and mortality was not observed. Conclusion: To date, the frequency of post- endoscopic sphincterotomy bleeding is lower than reported by older studies; nonetheless, bleeding is an important com-plication of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. We found a 1.23% frequency of post-endoscopic sphincterotomy bleeding, in agreement with previous literature. Our study also demonstrates the importance of early diagnosis and prompt treatment of this complication.

Özet

Giriş ve Amaç: Endoskopik retrograt kolanjiyopankreatografi, pankreatobi-liyer hastalıklarda etkin bir tanı ve tedavi aracı olmakla beraber ciddi komp-likasyonlara sahip olan invaziv bir işlemdir. Endoskopik retrograt kolanji-yopankreatografiişleminin önemli komplikasyonlarından biri kanamadır. Retrospektif olarak tek merkezde yapılan bu çalışmanın amacı,endoskopik sfinkterotomi sonrası kanamanın sıklığını, derecesini, tipini, risk faktörlerini ve uygulanan tedavi yöntemlerini belirlemektir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Ocak 2008-Nisan 2013 tarihleri arasında merkezimizde çeşitli endikasyonlar ile endoskopik retrograt kolanjiyopankreatografi yapılan hastalara ait kayıtlar retrospektif olarak incelendi. Bu süre aralığında endoskopik retrograt kolan-jiyopankreatografi yapılan toplam 12.893 hastadan endoskopik sfinkteroto-mi yapılan naiv papillalı 6552 hasta vardı. Endoskopik sfinkterotomi sonrası kanama gelişen hastalar çalışma popülasyonunu oluşturdu. Bulgular: En-doskopik sfinkterotomi yapılan hastaların 81’inde (%1.23) kanama saptan-dı. Hastaların 46’sı (%56.8) kadın ve 35’i (%43.2) erkek idi. Yaş ortalaması 64.9 (18-89) yıl olarak saptandı. Erken kanama 50 (%61.7) ve geç kanama 31 (%38.3) hastada görüldü. Kanama derecesi 53 (%65.4) hastada hafif, 21 (%25.9) hastada orta ve 7 (%8.6) hastada şiddetli saptandı. Hastaların 41’ine(%50.6) epinefrin enjeksiyonu, 25’ine (%30.8) epinefrin enjeksiyonu ile he-ater probu kombinasyonu, 7’sine (%8.6) heater probu, 2’sine (%2.4) balon tamponadı, 3’üne (%3.7)’üne balon tamponadı ile epinefrin enjeksiyon kom-binasyonu, 2’sine (%2.4) tam kaplı metalik stent ve 1’ine (%1.2) hemoklips uygulandı. Endoskopik sfinkterotomi kanaması gelişen bu hastalarda cerrahi gereksinim ve mortalite olmadı. Sonuç: Endoskopik retrograt kolanjiyo-pankreatografi işleminin önemli komplikasyonlarından biri olan kanama, eski çalışmalara göre günümüzde insidansı azalmakla birlikte halen önem arzetmektedir. Çalışmamızda, son yıllarda literatürde bildirilen endoskopik sfinkterotomi sonrası kanama oranlarına benzer oranda (%1.23) saptandı. Aynı zamanda çalışmamız, endoskopik sfinkterotomi sonrası kanamalara er-ken tanı ve zamanında müdahalenin önemli olduğunu göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

PARLAK, E., ÖZTAŞ, E., DİŞİBEYAZ, S., ÖDEMİŞ, B., KUZU, U. B., AKPINAR, M. Y., YILDIZ, H., SUNA, N., ETİK, D. Ö. (2022). Bleeding after endoscopic sphincterotomy: A single-center retrospective study. Endoskopi, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 1, 1–5. https://ajindex.com/articles/501058

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. McCune WS, Shorb PE, Moscovitz H. Endoscopic cannulation of the ampulla of Vater: a preliminary report. Ann Surg 1968;167:752-6
  2. Maple JT, Ben-Menachem T, Anderson MA, et al. The role of endoscopy in the evaluation of suspected choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc 2010;71:1-9.
  3. Baron TH, Mallery JS, Hirota WK, et al. The role of endoscopy in the evaluation and treatment of patients with pancreaticobiliary malignancy. Gastrointest Endosc 2003;58:643-9.
  4. Costamagna G, Shah SK, Tringali A. Current management of postope-rative complications and benign biliary strictures. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2003;13:635-48.
  5. Cotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes J, et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastro-intest Endosc 1991;37:383-93.
  6. Andriulli A, Loperfido S, Napolitano G, et al. Incidence rates of post-ER-CP complications: a systematic survey of prospective studies. Am J Gast-roenterol 2007;102:1781-8.
  7. Freeman ML, Nelson DB, Sherman S, et al. Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med 1996;335:909-18.
  8. Masci E, Toti G, Mariani A, et al. Complications of diagnostic and the-rapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 2001;96:417-23.
  9. Loperfido S, Angelini G, Benedetti G, et al. Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 1998;48:1-10.
  10. Rabenstein T, Schneider HT, Hahn EG, et al. 25 years of endoscopic sphincterotomy in Erlangen: assessment of the experience in 3498 pa-tients. Endoscopy 1998;30:A194-201. Vandervoort J, Soetikno RM, Tham TC, et al. Risk factors for complica-tions after performance of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 56:652-6.
  11. Christensen M, Matzen P, Schulze S, et al. Complications of ERCP: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 60:721. Williams EJ, Taylor S, Fairclough P, et al. Risk factors for complication following ERCP; results of a large-scale, prospective multicenter study. Endoscopy 2007; 39:793. Wang P, Li ZS, Liu F, et al. Risk factors for ERCP-related complications: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 2009; 104:31. Parlak E, Suna N, Kuzu UB, et al. Diverticulum With Papillae: Does Position of Papilla Affect Technical Success? Surg Laparosc Endosc Per-cutan Tech 2015;25:395-8.
  12. Osnes M, Lotveit T, Larson S, et al. Duodenal diverticula and the-ir relationship to age, sex, and biliary calculi. Scand J Gastroenterol 1981;16:103-7.
  13. Mesh E, Friedman E, Czerniak A,