Journals / Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences / 2008 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1

The effects of rate-restricted feeding regimes in cycles on digestive enzymes of gilthead sea-bream, Sparus aurata

Pages
49–54
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Thus, because of preserved digestive enzyme activities, some food restriction (R2) cycles may be recommended as a routine procedure in commercial production of juvenile gilthead sea bream.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In order to understand enzymatic alteration during the restricted-to-fed feeding schedules in cycles, the modulation of key enzyme activities in digestion was studied in different part of gastrointestinal track of juvenile gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Juveniles (6.4 g) were stocked into 12 tanks at a density of 16 fish per tank.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Thus, because of preserved digestive enzyme activities, some food restriction (R2) cycles may be recommended as a routine procedure in commercial production of juvenile gilthead sea bream.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:izmaritgiller · Pagrus aurata · amilaz

Özet

In order to understand enzymatic alteration during the restricted-to-fed feeding schedules in cycles, the modulation of key enzyme activities in digestion was studied in different part of gastrointestinal track of juvenile gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata). Juveniles (6.4 g) were stocked into 12 tanks at a density of 16 fish per tank. Four different feeding schedules were tested on triplicate groups of juvenile fish: (1) fish were fed to apparent satiation twice a day throughout 48 days, (2) starvation for 1 day and then re-fed for 2 days (S1), (3) 50% satiation for 2 days and then re-fed to apparent satiation for 2 days (R2), (4) 50% satiation for 6 days and then re-fed to apparent satiation for another 6 days (R6). The activity of total protease, amylase and lipase in the control group was higher than those S1 and R6 in whole gastrointestinal track. The restricted feeding in R2 enhanced the activities of lipase, amylase, and, to some extent, total protease in fish, with the mostly pronounced effect exhibited in the pyloric caeca. Generally, total protease and lipase activity of fish in R2 exhibited no significant difference compared to the control, except amylase activity in mid-intestine. Thus, because of preserved digestive enzyme activities, some food restriction (R2) cycles may be recommended as a routine procedure in commercial production of juvenile gilthead sea bream.

🔖

Cite This Article

EROLDOĞAN, O. T., SUZER, C., TAŞBOZAN, O., TABAKOĞLU, S. (2008). The effects of rate-restricted feeding regimes in cycles on digestive enzymes of gilthead sea-bream, Sparus aurata. Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1, 49–54. https://ajindex.com/articles/408385

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Alarcón, F.J., Martinez, T.F., Diaz, M. and Moyano, F.J. 2001. Characterization of digestive carbohydrase in the gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata). Hydrobiologia, 445: 199-204.
  2. Barrington, E.J.W. 1957. The alimentary canal and digestion. In: M.E. Brown (Ed.), Metabolism. Academic press. New York: 109-161. Bélanger, F., Blier, P.U. and Dutil, J.D. 2002. Digestive capacity and compensatory growth in Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua). Fish Physiol. Biochem., 26: 121 128. Bier, M. 1955. Lipases. Methods in Enzymology I. Academic Pres, New York, 627–642.
  3. Bolasina, S., Pérez, A. and Yamashita, Y. 2006. Digestive enzymes activity during ontogenetic development and effect of starvation in Japanese flounder, Paralichthys olivaceus. Aquaculture, 252: 503-515.
  4. Bradford, M.M. 1976. A rapid sensitive method for the quantification of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem., 72: 248-254.
  5. De Almeida, L.C., Lundstedt, L.M. and Moraes, G. 2006. Digestive enzyme responses of tambaqui (Colossoma macropomum) fed on different levels of protein and lipid. Aquacult. Nutr., 10: 443-450.
  6. De Silva, S.S. and Anderson, T.A. 1998. Fish Nutrition in Aquaculture. Chapman and Hall, London, 319 pp. Einen, O., Mørkøre, T., Rørå, A.M.B. and Thomassen, M.S. 1999. Feed ration prior to slaughter-a potential tool for managing product quality of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Aquaculture, 178: 149-169.
  7. Eroldoğan, O.T., Kumlu, M. and Aktaş, M. 2004. Optimum feeding rate for European sea bass Dicentrarchus labrax reared in seawater and freshwater. Aquaculture, 231(1-4): 501-515.
  8. Eroldoğan, O.T., Kumlu, M. and Sezer, B. 2006a. Effects of starvation and re-alimentation periods on growth performance and hyperphagic response of Sparus aurata. Aquacult. Res., 37(5): 535-537.
  9. Eroldoğan, O.T., Kumlu, M., Kiriş, G.A. and Sezer, B. 2006b. Compensatory growth response of Sparus aurata following different starvation and refeeding protocols. Aquacult. Nutr., 12: 203-210.
  10. Eroldoğan, O.T., Taşbozan, O. and Tabakoğlu, S. 2008. Effects of restricted feeding regimes on growth and feed utilization of juvenile gilthead sea bream, Sparus aurata. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society, 39(2): 267-274. Furné, M., Hidalgo, M.C., López, A., García-Gallego, M., Morales, A.E., Domezain, A., Domezainé, J. and Sanz, A. 2005. Digestive enzyme activities in Adriatic sturgeon Acipenser naccarii and rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss. A comparative study. Aquaculture, 250: 391-39