Journals / Türkiye İletişim Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2018 / Sayı: 30 - MEDYA ve DEMOKRASİ

The Impact of Suicide Attacks on Voting Behavior: The Case of November 2015 Early Elections

Pages
93–114
Publication Date
2018-10-25
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The majority of the participants believed thatthe suicide attack, whichtook place in the train station intersection in Ankara,would have no effect on the behaviors of the voters for the Early Elections of November 1, 2015.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Terror aims to disrupt peace and security of countries.
📊
Key Findings & Data:These attacks aiming at destroying countries and citizens, and targeting civilians or state institutions, have been the current agenda in Turkey with cases such as Suruc Attack and Ankara Railway Station Attack following the June 7, 2015, elections and the Syrian Civil War.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The majority of the participants believed thatthe suicide attack, whichtook place in the train station intersection in Ankara,would have no effect on the behaviors of the voters for the Early Elections of November 1, 2015.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Turkey · Terror · Suicide Attack

Özet

Terror aims to disrupt peace and security of countries. Suicide attacks, a form of terrorism is carried out in many parts of the world today. These attacks aiming at destroying countries and citizens, and targeting civilians or state institutions, have been the current agenda in Turkey with cases such as Suruc Attack and Ankara Railway Station Attack following the June 7, 2015, elections and the Syrian Civil War. These attacks, which deeply affect the citizens and harm the country, can also have an impacton political behaviors such as social practices. Individuals, as voters, may vote under the influence of political and social events. In this study, effects of suicide attacks in Turkey on voting behavior were demonstrated by means of a reception analysis on the example of the Ankara Train Station Attack (October 10, 2015). In this way, how suicide attacks in Turkey reflected on voting behavior concerning the November 1, 2015, Early Elections was analyzed. The ethnographic method was used in the study. As the conclusion of the study,the individuals were observed to be aware of the fact that the real purpose of terrorism was to scare and harm. The participants supported the government in case of the suicide attacks and other terrorist attacks. The majority of the participants believed thatthe suicide attack, whichtook place in the train station intersection in Ankara,would have no effect on the behaviors of the voters for the Early Elections of November 1, 2015.

🔖

Cite This Article

YEGEN, C. (2018). The Impact of Suicide Attacks on Voting Behavior: The Case of November 2015 Early Elections. Türkiye İletişim Araştırmaları Dergisi, Sayı: 30 - MEDYA ve DEMOKRASİ, 93–114. https://ajindex.com/articles/4083

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Açıkgöz, R. (2016). İntihar saldırıları ve terörizm ilişkisi üzerine eleştirel bir değerlendirme (Filistin örneği). Mukaddime, 7(2), 321-340.
  2. Alkan, O. M. (2006). Türkiye’de seçim sistemi tercihinin misyon boyutu ve demokratik gelişime etkileri. Anayasa Yargısı (23), pp. 133-165. Ankara'da barış mitingine bombalı saldırı: 95 ölü. (2015). BBC. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/turkce/haberler/2015/10/151010_ankara_saldiri_genel. Anti-Terror Law (Republic of Turkey). (1991). Law Number: 3713, Acceptance Date: 12/4/1991 Published Official Newspaper: Date: 12/4/1991 No: 20843. Arndt, J., & Vess, M. (2008). Tales from existential oceans: Terror management theory and how the awareness of our mortality affects us all. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(2), pp. 909-928.
  3. Aydın, S. O. (2007). Alımlama araştırmaları ve kültürel çalışmalar geleneğinin katkısı. İstanbul Ticaret Univesity Journal of Social Sciences, 6(11), pp. 119-131.
  4. Barrett, R. (2014). The Islamic State. The Soufan Group. Retrieved from http://soufangroup.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/TSG-The-Islamic-State-Nov14.pdf Belçika’daki terör saldırısını IŞİD üstlendi. (2018, May 30). Cumhuriyet. Retrieved from http://www.cumhuriyet.com.tr/haber/dunya/986494/Belcika_daki_teror_saldirisini_ISiD_ustlendi.html.
  5. Benmelech, E., & Klor, E. F. (2016). What explains the flow of foreign fighters to ISIS? National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w22190.pdf
  6. Beren, F. (2013). Seçmen tercihine etki eden faktörler ve seçim güvenliği: Şanlıurfa ili örneği. Journal of Academic Inquiries, 8(1), pp. 191-214.
  7. Berman, E., & Laitin, D. D. (2005). Hard targets: Theory and evidence on suicide attacks. National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w11740.pdf. Bombacılar belirlendi. (2015, October 14). Cumhuriyet. Retrieved from http://www.cumhuriyet.com.tr/haber/turkiye/387751/Bombacilar_belirlendi.html.
  8. Bradshaw, P., & Rohumaa, L. (2013). The online journalism handbook: Skills to survive and thrive in the digital age. London: Routledge. Brodeur, A. (2015). Terrorism and employment: Evidence from successful and failed terror attacks. Bonn: The Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA). Brym, J. R., & Araj, B. (2012). Are suicide bombers suicidal? Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 35(6), pp. 432–443.
  9. Cantenar, O. F., & Tümlü, F. (2016). PKK terör örgütünün eylemlerinin güvenlik güçleri zayiatı açısından analizi. Science Journal of Turkish Military Academ