Journals / Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences / 2004 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2

Effect of the handling procedures on the chemical composition of sea cucumber

Pages
71–74
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

There was a significant difference (p<0.05) in the water, ash, fat, and protein content for the first method.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study compared the chemical compositions of sea cucumbers harvested from the Marmara Sea during the spring and summer in different months.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The moisture content of fresh sea cucumber decreased from 85% to 6.5% when it was processed with the first method, while the post-processing water content with second method came out to be 6%.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:There was a significant difference (p<0.05) in the water, ash, fat, and protein content for the first method.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study compared the chemical compositions of sea cucumbers harvested from the Marmara Sea during the spring and summer in different months. They were processed using two different methods. The first method was evisceration by cutting the anus, followed by removal of the viscera by firmly squeezing the body. The second method was evisceration by cutting along the length of the body, followed by removal of the viscera. All of the sea cucumbers were boiled and dried. Their water, ash, protein, and fat contents were measured and recorded prior to and after processing. The moisture content of fresh sea cucumber decreased from 85% to 6.5% when it was processed with the first method, while the post-processing water content with second method came out to be 6%. Fresh sea cucumber (based on dry weight) contained 5.78-9.53% protein and 0.06-0.37% fat. The approximate percent composition of fat, protein, and ash were determined to be 1.17-2.44%, 39.77-59.57%, and 17.91-44.53% respectively for the first method; and 1.71-2.31%, 40.97-60.18%, and 29.82-40.04% for respectively for the second method. No significant differences were found for the second method in the water, ash, and fat content. Protein content was significantly lower for the second method in July. There was a significant difference (p<0.05) in the water, ash, fat, and protein content for the first method.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZER, N. P., MOL., S., VARLIK, C. (2004). Effect of the handling procedures on the chemical composition of sea cucumber. Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2, 71–74. https://ajindex.com/articles/408296

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Anonymous. 2003. Concerted Actionf Co-ordination of Research in Fishery Economics Assessment in EU Fisheries (2003) Economic performance of selected European fishing fleets. Annual Report 2003. Promotion of common methods for economic assessment of EU fisheries, 213 pp. Hannesson, R. 1986. The Economic Characteristics of the Management of the Inshore Fishery on Cyprus. A Report Prepared for the Fisheries Development Project FAO, 79 pp. Hannesson, R. 1989. Optimum Fishing Effort and Economic Rent: A Case Study of Cyprus. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper No. 299, 57 pp. Hannesson, R. 1993. Bio-economic Analysis of Fisheries. Fishing News Books.Blackwell Scientific Publications, 138 pp. King, M. 1995.
  2. Fisheries Biology, Assessment and Management Fishing News Books, 341 pp. Sinclair, M., Arnason, R., Csirke, J., Karnicki, Z., Sigurjonsson, J., Skjoldal, R.H. and Valdimarsson, G. 2002. Responsible fisheries in the marine ecosystem. Fisheries Research, 58: 255-265.
  3. Sutinen, J.G. and Soboil, M. 2003. The performance of fisheries management system and the ecosystem challenge. M. Sinclair, G. Valdimarsson, (eds.) Responsible Fisheries in the Marine Ecosystem. CAB International, Wallinggford.Rome,Italy.Wallingford, UK, 291-309.
  4. Tietze, U., Prado, J., Le Ry, J-M. and Lasch, R. 2001. Techno-economic performance of marine capture fisheries. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper No. 421, 79 pp. Ünal, V. and Hoşsucu, H. 1996. Foça trollerinin ekonomik analizi. Ege Üniversitesi Su Ürünleri Dergisi, 13 (1 2): 149-161.
  5. Ünal, V. 2001. Foça balıkçılığının sosyo-ekonomik analizi ve sürdürülebilirlilik açısından değerlendirilmesi üzerine araştırmalar. PhD. thesis, İzmir-Borhova: Ege University.