SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences / 2010 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1

Küçükçekmece lagünündeki epipelik alg florası

Epipelic algal flora in the Küçükçekmece Lagoon

Nesrin POLGE
Atakan SUKATAR
Elif Neyran SOYLU
Arif GÖNÜLOL
Pages
39–45
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Cluster analysis was applied to the epipelic algal community and produced two major groups reflecting the importance of seasonal variation on the epipelic algal flora.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study on epipelic algal flora and its seasonal variations in the Küçükçekmece Lagoon, Turkey was carried out between May 2001 and June 2002.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 109 species were identified, most of which belonged to Bacillariophyta (64 taxa).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Cluster analysis was applied to the epipelic algal community and produced two major groups reflecting the importance of seasonal variation on the epipelic algal flora.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2001 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Türkiye · kıyı gölü · kümeleme analizi

Abstract

This study on epipelic algal flora and its seasonal variations in the Küçükçekmece Lagoon, Turkey was carried out between May 2001 and June 2002. A total of 109 species were identified, most of which belonged to Bacillariophyta (64 taxa). Other taxa identified included members of Cyanophyta (26), Chlorophyta (13), Euglenophyta (5) and Phaeophyta (1). Bacillariophyta were dominant in terms of species number and abundance at five stations. The seasonality of epipelic algal flora was different at all stations. Lower total cell numbers were registered at St. 5. Pennate diatoms especially Amphora spp., Navicula spp., Nitzschia spp. and Synedra spp. were dominant during the sampling period. Cluster analysis was applied to the epipelic algal community and produced two major groups reflecting the importance of seasonal variation on the epipelic algal flora.

Özet

Küçükçekmece lagünü epipelik alg florası ve mevsimsel değişimi üzerine olan bu araştırma, Mayıs 2001ve Haziran 2002 tarihleri arasında gerçekleştirilmiştir. Çoğunluğu Bacillariophyta (64 takson) divizyosuna ait olan toplam 109 tür belirlenmiştir. Diğer taksonlar Cyanophyta (26), Chlorophyta (13), Euglenophyta (5) ve Phaeophyta (1) üylerine aittir. Bacilllariophyta tür sayısı ve bolluğu bakımından beş istasyonda dominant olmuştur. Daha düşük organizma sayılarına 5. istasyonda rastlanmıştır. Pennat diyatomelerden özellikle Amphora spp., Navicula spp., Nitzschia spp. ve Synedra spp. örnekleme süresince dominant olmuştur. Kümeleme analizi epipelik alg kommunitesine uygulanmış ve epipelik alg florası üzerine mevsimsel değişimin etkisini gösteren iki büyük grup oluşmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

POLGE, N., SUKATAR, A., SOYLU, E. N., GÖNÜLOL, A. (2010). Küçükçekmece lagünündeki epipelik alg florası. Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1, 39–45. https://ajindex.com/articles/408214

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Abreu, P., Conde, D., Fabian, D., Gorga, J. and Clemente, J. 1994. Particulate and dissolved phytoplankton production of the Patos Lagoon estuary, Southern Brazil: Comparison of methods and influencing factors. J. Plankton Res., 16: 737-735.
  2. Aberle, N. and Wiltshire, K.H. 2006. Seasonality and diversity patterns of microphytobenthos in a mesotrophic lake. Arch. Hydrobiol., 167: 447-465.
  3. Admiraal, W. and Peletier, H. 1979. Influence of organic compounds and light limitation on the growth rate of estuarine benthic diatoms. British Phycological Journal, 14: 197-206.
  4. Albay, M., Matthiensen, A. and Codd, G.A. 2005. Occurrence of Toxic Blue-Green Algae in the Küçükçekmece Lagoon (İstanbul, Turkey). Environmental Toxicology, 20: 277–284.
  5. Anagnostidis, K. and Komárek, J. 1988. Modern approach to the classification system of Cyanophytes. 3 - Oscillatoriales. Archiv Für Hydrobiologie. Suppl. 80, Algological Studies, 80: 327- 472. Anderson, N.J. 2000. Diatoms, temperature and climatic change. European Journal of Phycology, 35: 307-314. Anonymous, 2000.
  6. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Meteorological Bulletin, Mean and Extreme Temperature and Rainfall Values, Ankara,
  7. Turkey. Barnes, R.S.K. 1980. Coastal lagoons. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 106 pp. Bennion, H., Appleby, B.G. and Philips, G.L. 2001. Assessing eutrophication in the Norfolk Broads: implications for the application of diatom-phosphorus transfer functions to shallow lake management. Journal of Paleolimnology, 26: 181-204.
  8. Cyr, H. 1998. How does the vertical distribution of chlorophyll vary in littoral sediments of small lakes? Freshwat. Biol., 40: 25-40.
  9. Hill, W. 1996. Effects of light. In: R.J. Stevenson, M.L. Bothwell, and R.L. Lowe (Eds.): Algal Ecology, Freshwater Benthic Ecocystems. Academic Press, London: 121–148.
  10. Hillebrand, H. and Kahlert, M. 2001. Effect of grazing and nutrient supply on periphyton biomass and nutrient stoichiometry in habitats of different productivity, Limnol. Oceanogr., 46: 1881-1898.
  11. John, D.M., Whitton, B.A. and Brook, A.J. 2003. The Freshwater Algal Flora of the British Isles: An identification guide to freshwater and terrestrial algae, The Natural History Museum and The British Phycological Society, Cambridge University press, Cambridge, 700 pp. Kann, E. 1993. The littoral algal biocoenoses of Lake Erken and its outlet (Uppland, Sweden). Arch. Hydrobiol. Suppl. 97, Algol. Stud., 69: 91-112.
  12. Khondker, M. and Dokulil, M. 1988. Seasonality, biomass and primary