Journals / Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences / 2014 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 4

Effects of black thorn, Kaempferia galanga single or in Combination with yeast probiotic on feed palatability, growth performance and product quality of Labeo rohita Fingerling (Hamilton)

Pages
915–920
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, the combination of probiotics and attractant could confer the better results as compared to their individual dietary inclusion.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:A 63 -days indoor feeding trial was conducted to assess the growth performance of Labeo rohita fingerling (69.82±0.53 g) fed with three experimental diets containing black thorn, Kaempferia galanga as natural attractant, yeast as probiotic and their combination.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Comparable feed consumption in groups fed with attractant (86.54 g) and combination of attractant and probiotic (85.17 g) compa red to group fed probiotic only (74.10 g) were observed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, the combination of probiotics and attractant could confer the better results as compared to their individual dietary inclusion.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

A 63 -days indoor feeding trial was conducted to assess the growth performance of Labeo rohita fingerling (69.82±0.53 g) fed with three experimental diets containing black thorn, Kaempferia galanga as natural attractant, yeast as probiotic and their combination. Comparable feed consumption in groups fed with attractant (86.54 g) and combination of attractant and probiotic (85.17 g) compa red to group fed probiotic only (74.10 g) were observed. Combined use of attractant and probiotic in the diet resulted in highest percent live weight gain (105.30%) compared to the individual inclusion of attractant (60.88%) a nd probiotic (72.63%). Comparison of feed conversion ratio (FCR) indicated better conversion when fed with the diet containing both the attractant and probiotic (3.69) compared to the other diets containing either probiotic (4.96) or attractant (5.20). Further, highest accretion of carcass protein was recorded in groups fed diet with combination of additives (254.79%), followed by attractant (193.03%) and probiotic (159.29%) alone. RNA/DNA ratio in both liver and muscle exhibited a significant (P<0.05), linear increase in groups fed diet with only probiotics followed by attractant alone, and the combination of both probiotics and attractant accordingly. Present study revealed better efficacy of feed supplemented with Kaempferia galanga in feed consumption, growth promotion and utilization in L. rohita fingerlings, as compared to that with probiotic. However, the combination of probiotics and attractant could confer the better results as compared to their individual dietary inclusion.

🔖

Cite This Article

HASSAN, M. A., AFTABUDDİN, M., MEENA, D. K., SAHA, S., DASGUPTA, S., SHARMA, A. P. (2014). Effects of black thorn, Kaempferia galanga single or in Combination with yeast probiotic on feed palatability, growth performance and product quality of Labeo rohita Fingerling (Hamilton). Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 4, 915–920. https://ajindex.com/articles/408078

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Ajiboye, O.O., Yakubu, A.F. and Adams, T.E. 2012. A perspective on the ingestion and nutritional effects of feed additives in farmed fish species. World Journal of Fisheries and Marine Sciences, 4(1): 87 -101. doi: 10.58 29/idosi.wjfms.2012.04.01.56264 AOAC 1990. International: Official Methods of Analysis, 1, 1990. 9 CFR 318.19 (b). APHA 1985. American Public Health Association Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 16 th Edition,
  2. American Public Health Association, Washington, D.C. Cerezuela, R., Fumanal, M., Tapia-Paniagua, S.T., Meseguer, J., Moriñigo, M.Á. and Esteban, M.A. 2013. Changes in intestinal morphology and microbiota caused by dietary administration of inulin and Bacillus subtilis in gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata ). Fish and Shellfish Immunology, 34(5): 10 63 - 1070. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2012.12.026 De, B.C., Meena, D.K., Behera, B.K., Das, P., Das Mohapatra, P.K. and Sharma, A.P. 2014. Probiotic in fish and shellfish culture: Immunomodulatory and ecophysiological responses (a review). Fish Physiology and Bioc hemistry, 40: 921 –971. doi: 10.1007/s10695 -013 -9897 -0 Denev, S., Staykov, Y., Moutafchieva, R. and Beev, G. 2009. Microbial ecology of the gastrointestinal tract of fish and the potential application of probiotic and prebiotics in finfish aquaculture. In t. Aquat. Research, 1: 1 -29. doi: 10.1111/j.17497345.2005.tb00390.x Duncan, D.B. 1955. Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics, 11: 1 -42. doi: 10.1037/h0042478 Guo, Y.J., Bai, D.Q., Yan, S.S., Wu, X., Ning, B. and Wu, W.F. 2010. Baiting effects of 17 Chinese medicinal plants on Brach ydanio rerio. Agricultural Science and Technology - Hunan, 11(2): 117 -120. Irianto, A. and Austin, B. 2002. Probiotic in aquaculture. Journal of Fis h Diseases, 25: 633 -642. doi: 10.1046/j.1365 -2761.2002.00422.x Jones, K.A. 1980. Temperature dependant attraction by gold fish to a chemical feeding cue presented alone or in combination with heated water. Physiology and Behavior, 35: 509 -515. doi: 10.1016/0031 -9384(84) 90363 -9 Kasumyan, A. and Døving, K.V. 2003.
  3. Taste Preferences in Fish, Fish and Fisheries, 4(4): 289 -347. doi: 10.1046/j.1467 -2979.2003.00121.x Kumar, S., Sahu, N.P. and Pal, A.K. 2006. Non -gelatinized Corn Supplemented with Microbial α-amylase at Sub - optimmal Protein in the Diet of Labeo rohita (Hamilton) Fingerlings Increases Cell Size of Muscle. Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 1(2): 102 - 111. doi: 10.3923/jfas.2006.102.111