Journals / Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences / 2014 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 3

Comparison of the Efficiency of Common Carp and Silver Carp Pituitary in the Breeding of Common Carp (Cyprinus carpio) and Northern Pike (Esox lucius)

Pages
0–0
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to our research, SCP could be suitable to have wide application for induced ovulation of fish in the future.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Hormone preparations are used by fish farmers for artificial propagation of fish.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Ovulation rate of northern pike females for both groups was 70.4% in the first experimental year.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to our research, SCP could be suitable to have wide application for induced ovulation of fish in the future.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Hormone preparations are used by fish farmers for artificial propagation of fish. In practice, acetone-dried common carp pituitary is the most commonly used agent to induce ovulation. In the last two decades the supply of glands has reduced and the market price has soared. The aim of our research was to compare the effects of silver carp pituitary (SCP) to those of common carp pituitary (CCP) on different reproductive traits. Experiments were performed over the large-scale breeding of northern pike (Esox lucius) and common carp (Cyp rinus carpio). Ovulation rate of northern pike females for both groups was 70.4% in the first experimental year. In the second year, ovulation rates were 94.4% and 87% for the CCP and SCP groups, respectively. The relative amounts of stripped eggs (PGSI) for the two groups were similar (14.3%) in the first year. In the second year PGSI values were 18.7±3.43% and 20.1±3.92% for the CCP and SCP groups, respectively. Fertilization rates for the two groups were similar in both experimental years. Ovulation rates for common carp females induced by CCP and SCP were 66.7% and 100%, respectively. In the CCP group PGSI was 13.7±5.49%, while in the SCP group is was 14.5±2.32%. With the exception of ovulation rate of common carp, all reproductive traits for the two treatments were statistically similar. According to our research, SCP could be suitable to have wide application for induced ovulation of fish in the future.

🔖

Cite This Article

SZABO, T., DITROI, B., SZABO, K., BOKOR, Z., URBANYI, B. (2014). Comparison of the Efficiency of Common Carp and Silver Carp Pituitary in the Breeding of Common Carp (Cyprinus carpio) and Northern Pike (Esox lucius). Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 3, 0–0. https://ajindex.com/articles/408076

References (5)

  1. Brzuska, E. 2001. Artificial spawning of carp Cyp rinus carp io L.: the use of Aquaspawn and carp pituitary to induce ovulation in females of Lithuanian line B. Aquaculture Research, 32: 357-364. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2109.2001.00565.x Brzuska, E. 2005. Artificial spawning of carp (Cyp rinus carp io L.): differences between females of Polish strain 6 and Hungarian strain W treated with carp pituitary homogenate, Ovopel or Dagin. Aquaculture Research, 36: 1015–1025. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2109. 2005.01311.x Chang, J.P. and Peter, R.E. 1983. Effects of pimozide and des Gly10, [D-Ala6]luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone ethylamide on serum gonadotropin concentrations, germinal vesicle migration, and ovulation in female goldfish, Carassius auratus. General and Comparative Endocrinology, 52: 30-37. doi: 10.1016/0016-6480(83)90155-7
  2. Donaldson, E.M. and Hunter, G.A. 1983. Induced final maturation, ovulation and spermiation in cultured fish. In: W.S. Hoar, D.J. Randall and E.M. Donaldson (Eds.), Fish Physiology, New York, Academic Press: 351-403. doi: 10.1016/S1546-5098(08)60307-6 Horváth, L., Szabó, T. and Burke, J. 1997. Hatchery testing of GnRH analogue-containing pellets on ovulation in four cyprinid species. Polish Archives of Hydrobiology, 44: 219-224.
  3. Kucharczyk, D., Kujawa, R., Mamcarz, A., Targonska- Dietrich, K., Wyszomirska, E., Glogowski, J., Babiak, I. and Szabo, T. 2005. Induced spawning in bream (Abramis brama L.) using pellets containing GnRH. Czech Journal of Animal Sciences, 50: 89-95.
  4. Kucharczyk, D., Targońska, K., Hliwa, P., Gomułka, P., Kwiatkowski, M., Krejszeff, S. and Perkowski, J. 2008. Reproductive parameters of common carp (Cyp rinus carp io L.) spawners during natural season and out-of-season spawning. Reproductive Biology, 8: 285-289. doi: 10.1016/S1642-431X(12)60018-7
  5. Mylonas, C.C., Fostier, A. and Zanuy, S. 2010. Broodstock management and hormonal manipulations of fish reproduction. General and Comparative Endocrinology, 165: 516–534. doi: 10.1016/j.ygcen. 2009.03.007 Olsen, Y. 2011. Resources for fish feed in future mariculture. Aquaculture Environment Interactions, 1: 187–200. doi: 10.3354/aei00019 Peter, R.E., Lin, H.R. and van Der Kraak, G. 1988. Induced ovulation and spawning of cultured freshwater fish in China: Advances in application of GnRH analogues and dopamine antagonists. Aquaculture, 74: 1-10. doi: 10.1016/0044-8486(88)90080-4 Szabó, T., Szabó, R., Urbányi, B. and Horváth, L. 2000. Review of the results of common carp