Journals / Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences / 2017 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 3

Evaluation and Categorization of The Fishing Ports with a Fuzzy Spatial Multi Criteria Approach: The Case of Turkey

Pages
499–508
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results of the study showed that the methodology is capable of dealing with spatial and non-spatial characteristics of the data-set and determine the convenient alternatives.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Fishing ports are the vital constituent of the fishery industry of Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:With governmental contribution, the number ofthe fishing ports reached to 366 alongside of the shores and the collected fish volume has been in increasing trend.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results of the study showed that the methodology is capable of dealing with spatial and non-spatial characteristics of the data-set and determine the convenient alternatives.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Fishing ports are the vital constituent of the fishery industry of Turkey. With governmental contribution, the number ofthe fishing ports reached to 366 alongside of the shores and the collected fish volume has been in increasing trend. However, there are differences in the location characteristics and technical infrastructure so that each facility’s success level is measured differently with convenient parameters. To increase the performance of fishing ports, for their better utilization, and also to understand which of them can be transformed to regional centers a classification is needed. With the transformation to the regional centers, i.e. the infrastructure improvements of the facilities and providing multiple services such as tourism and transportation activities; the efficiency of the ports can be increased. In this paper, a classification methodology is developed and it is tested. While applying the methodology, expert workshops are carried out to represent current fishery environment in Turkey. In the meetings, decision criteria are discussed by participating over 200 experts in the field. f-AHP and GIS/Spatial Analysis is used to analyze spatial suitability. Results of the study showed that the methodology is capable of dealing with spatial and non-spatial characteristics of the data-set and determine the convenient alternatives.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖNDEN, İ., SAMASTI, M., ÇANCI, M., ELDEMİR, F., AKTEL, A. (2017). Evaluation and Categorization of The Fishing Ports with a Fuzzy Spatial Multi Criteria Approach: The Case of Turkey. Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 3, 499–508. https://ajindex.com/articles/408027

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Albet, A. P. 2010. Spatial Assessment and impact of Artisanal Fisheries Activity in Cap de Creus. MSc. thesis. University of the Algarve. ArcGIS Help 10.1 - Understanding overlay analysis. (n.d.). http://resources.arcgis.com/en/help/main/10.1/index.ht ml#//009z000000rs000000 (accessed June 4, 2015)
  2. Ashrafzadeh, M., Rafiei, F. M., Isfahani, N. M., & Zare, Z. 2012. Application of fuzzy TOPSIS method for the selection of warehouse location: a case study. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 3(9), 655–667.
  3. Athawale, V. M., Chatterjee, P., & Chakraborty, S. 2012. Decision making for facility location selection using PROMETHEE II method. International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 1(11), 16–30. doi: 10.1504/IJISE.2012.046652. Buckley, J. J. 1985. Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 17(3), 233–247, doi:10.1016/0165- 0114(85)90090-9.
  4. Chang, D.-Y. 1996. Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 95(3), 649–695, doi:10.1016/0377-2217(95)00300-2. Durán, O., & Aguilo, J. 2008. Computer-aided machine-tool selection based on a Fuzzy-AHP approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 34(3), 1787–1794. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.01.046
  5. Erisman, B. E., Paredes, G. A., Plomozo-Lugo, T., CotaNieto, J. J., Hastings, P. A., & Aburto-Oropeza, O. 2011. Spatial structure of commercial marine fisheries in Northwest Mexico. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 68(3), 564–571, doi: 10.1093/icesjms/fsq179. ESRI 2014a. Euclidean Distance (Spatial Analyst). http://resources.arcgis.com/en/help/main/10.1/index.ht ml#//009z0000001p000000(accessed June 4, 2015) ESRI 2014b. How Hot Spot Analysis (Getis-Ord Gi*) works. http://resources.arcgis.com/en/help/main/10.2/index.ht ml#//005p00000011000000 (accessed June 4, 2015)
  6. Israel, D. C., & Roque, R. M. G. R. (2000). Analysis of Fishing Ports in the Philippines. Makati City. Jankowski, P. 1995. Integrating geographical information systems and multiple criteria decision-making methods. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 9(3), 251–273. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/026937 99508902036
  7. Jenks, G. F. 1967. The Data Model Concept in Statistical Mapping. International Yearbook of Cartography, 7, 186–190.
  8. Laarhoven, P. J. M. van, & Pedrycz, W. 1983. A fuzzy extension of Saaty’s priority theory. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 11(1–3), 199–227, doi:10.1016/S0165- 0114(83)80082-7.
  9. Liou, T.-S., & Wa