Journals / Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences / 2018 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 1

The Economies of Scale of Turbot Industrial Running Water Aquaculture System in China: A Case from Shandong Province

Pages
167–173
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results showed that (1) the overall efficiencies ofdifferent farms increased with the enlargement of their farming scale and (2) the efficiency of each farming scale could still beimproved.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:China is the most important production contributor of farmed turbot in the world.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The economies of scale of turbotfarming industry in this significant country haven’t been studied in detail.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results showed that (1) the overall efficiencies ofdifferent farms increased with the enlargement of their farming scale and (2) the efficiency of each farming scale could still beimproved.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

China is the most important production contributor of farmed turbot in the world. The economies of scale of turbotfarming industry in this significant country haven’t been studied in detail. In this study, based on survey data from the largestfarming area of this species, Shandong Province of China in 2015, DEA (Data Envelopment Analysis) was used to assess theturbot culture efficiency of different farming scales. All these turbot farmers used industrial running water aquaculture system,which provided over 90% of China’s total production of this species. The results showed that (1) the overall efficiencies ofdifferent farms increased with the enlargement of their farming scale and (2) the efficiency of each farming scale could still beimproved. Given the outputs unchanged, a reduction in inputs can improve the utilization efficiency of feeds, electricity andlabor, and reduce the irrational exploitation of land and groundwater resources; this change would not only increase economicbenefits but also protect natural resources, thereby achieving the harmonious development of the economy and environment.

🔖

Cite This Article

CANG, P., YANG, Z., DUAN, Y. (2018). The Economies of Scale of Turbot Industrial Running Water Aquaculture System in China: A Case from Shandong Province. Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 1, 167–173. https://ajindex.com/articles/407574

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Alam, M.F. (2011). Measuring technical allocative and cost efficiency of pangas (Pangasius hypophthalmus: Sauvage 1878) fish farmers of Bangladesh. Aquaculture Research, (42), 1487-1500. http://dx.doi.10.1111/j.1365-2109.2010.02741.x
  2. Coelli, T.J., Prasada Rao, D.S., O’Donnell, C.J., & Battese, G.E. (2005). Introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis. New York: Springer Science & Business Media. Cook, W.D., & Seiford, L.M. (2009). Data envelopment analysis thirty years ago. European Journal of Operational Research, (192), 1-17. http://dx.doi.10.1016/j.ejor.2008.01.032
  3. Cinemre, H.A., Ceyhan, V., & Bozoglu, M. (2006). The cost efficiency of trout farms in the Black Sea region Turkey, Aquaculture, (251), 324-332. http://dx.doi.10.3923/jas. 2006.2882.2888. Helfand, S.M., & Leveine, E.S. (2004). Farm size and the determinants of productive efficiency in the Brazilian Center-West. Agricultural Economics, (31), 241-249. http://dx.doi.10.1016/j.ageco.2004.09.021
  4. Huang, S.P., & Yang, Z.Y. (2011). Economical analysis on the turbot industrial cultivation in China. Guangdong Agricultural Sciences, 16, 113-116.
  5. Iliyasu, A., Mohamed, Z.A., Ismail, M.M., Amin, A.M., & Mazuki, H. (2016). Technical efficiency of cage fish farming in Peninsular Malaysia: a stochastic frontier production approach. Aquaculture Research, (47), 101-113. http://doi.10.1111/are.12474
  6. Liang, P., & Yu, L. (2014). Empirical study on the fishery performance in China: based on 1999-2010 panel data. Science-Technology and Management, 2, 21-26.
  7. Qin, Z., Zhang, J.E., & Luo, S.M. (2011). Evaluation on agricultural production efficiency of Guangdong based on DEA window analysis. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 6, 1448-1454. http://dx.doi.10.3724/sp.j.1011.2011.01448
  8. Ray, S.C. (2004). Data envelopment analysis: theory and techniques for economics and operations research. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  9. Sharma, K.R., Leung, P.S., Hailiang, C., & Peterson, A. (1999). Economic efficiency and optimum stocking densities in fish polyculture: An application of the data envelopment analysis (DEA) to Chinese fish farms. Aquaculture, (180), 207–221. http://dx.doi./ 10.1016/S0044-8486(99)00202-1
  10. Sun, C.C. (2011). Assessing Taiwan financial holding companies performance using window analysis and malmquist productivity Indies. African Journal of Business Management, (5), 10508-10523. http://dx.doi.10.5897/AJBM11.438
  11. Tone, K., & Tsutsui, M. (2010). An epsilon-based measure of efficiency in DEA a third