Journals / The anatolian journal of family medicine (Online) / 2022 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1

Evaluation of the COVID-19 Triage Results in an Education Family Practice Center

Pages
12–16
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Triage practices should be maintained in primary healthcare centers throughout the pandemic.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the COVID-19 triage results of the admissions made by patients in a certain region to the Education Family Practice Center (E-FPC) during the pandemic period.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Patients aged 18 years and above, who were applied to the E-FPC between March 12 and April 30, 2020, were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Triage practices should be maintained in primary healthcare centers throughout the pandemic.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2020 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the COVID-19 triage results of the admissions made by patients in a certain region to the Education Family Practice Center (E-FPC) during the pandemic period. Methods: Patients aged 18 years and above, who were applied to the E-FPC between March 12 and April 30, 2020, were included in the study. Every patient had filled in a triage form. Potential cases were referred to a high-level healthcare center. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and chest computed tomography (CT) results of the referred patients were followed up and noted. Results: Four hundred sixty-one patients were included in the study. Twenty-seven (5.9%) patients had a fever, 219 (47.5%) patients had a cough, 34 (7.4%) patients had dyspnea, and 305 (66.2%) patients had other symptoms. Eighty-six (18.6%) of the patients were admitted to the hospital for PCR test of which 15 (17.4%) had a positive test result. Seventy-one (15.4%) patients underwent a chest CT and 25 (35.2%) of them had results compatible with COVID-19. Fever was detected in 8 (53.3%) of the patients with a positive PCR result and in 6 (8.5%) patients with a negative PCR result (p<0.001). Dyspnea was detected in 13 (52.0%) patients whose chest CT results were compatible with COVID-19 and in 5 (10.9%) patients whose chest CT results were not compatible with COVID-19 (p<0.001). Conclusion: Symptoms, CT imaging, and PCR results should be evaluated together in the diagnosis of COVID- 19. Triage practices should be maintained in primary healthcare centers throughout the pandemic.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖKSEVEN, Y., GROMMEN, B., TÜRKÖZ, D., YAZLA, B., ÖZMEN, S., ZERENÖZTÜRK, G., BAYRAKTAR, B., ÖZDEMİR, H. M. (2022). Evaluation of the COVID-19 Triage Results in an Education Family Practice Center. The anatolian journal of family medicine (Online), Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 12–16. https://ajindex.com/articles/407383

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Acar H, Gökseven Y, Zeren Öztürk G, Arıca S. Covid-19 ın primary healthcare. Ankara Med J 2020;20(2):444–67
  2. Issever H, Issever T, Oztan G. Epidemiology of COVID-19. Journal of Advanced Research in Health Sciences 2020;3(1):1–13
  3. Demirbilek Y, Pehlivantürk G, Özgüler Z, Alp Meşe E. COVID-19 outbreak control, example of ministry of health of Turkey. Turk J Med Sci 2020;50:489–94
  4. Taşkın Egici M, Gökseven Y, Zeren Öztürk G, Esen ES, Toprak D. Educational family health centers’ in family medicine resident training experience of Şişli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital. J Fam Pract 2019;23(4):165–75
  5. Öner Şimşek D. Triaj sistemlerine genel bakış ve Türkiye’de acil servis başvurularını etkileyen faktörlerin lojistik regresyon ile belirlenmesi. Sosyal Güvence 2018;0(13):84–115
  6. T.C Sağlık Bakanlığı. COVID-19 pandemisinde sağlık kurumlarında çalışma rehberi ve enfeksiyon kontrol önlemleri. Avaible at: https://covid19.saglik.gov.tr/Eklenti/39606/0/ covid-19saglikkurumlarindacalismarehberiveenfeksiyonkontrolonlemleripdf. pdf. Accessed Dec 21, 2020
  7. Balasubramanian S, Rao NM, Goenka A, Roderick M, Ramanan A V. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in children - what we know so far and what we do not. Indian Pediatr 2020;57(5):435–42
  8. T.C Sağlık Bakanlığı Halk Sağlığı Genel Müdürlüğü. COVID-19 (SARS-CoV2 enfeksiyonu) rehberi; 11 Mart 2020. Available at: https://www.tahud.org.tr/file/58f0a672-b2e0-482e-bf7c- 61749426bac7/COVID-19_11Mart2020.pdf. Accessed Mar 21, 2021
  9. Li LQ, Huang T, Wang YQ, Wang ZP, Liang Y, Huang TB, et al. COVID-19 patients’ clinical characteristics, discharge rate, and fatality rate of meta-analysis. J Med Virol 2020;92(6):577–83
  10. Zhou F, Yu T, Du R, Fan G, Liu Y, Liu Z, et al. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID- 19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 2020;395(10229):1054–62
  11. Grasselli G, Zangrillo A, Zanella A, Antonelli M, Cabrini L, Castelli A, et al. Baseline characteristics and outcomes of 1591 patients ınfected with SARS-CoV-2 admitted to ICUs of the Lombardy region, Italy. JAMA 2020;323(16):1574–81
  12. Perrotta F, Corbi G, Mazzeo G, Boccia M, Aronne L, D’Agnano V, et al. COVID-19 and the elderly: insights into pathogenesis and clinical decision-making. Aging Clin Exp Res 2020:32;1599– 608
  13. Won HK, Yoon SJ, Song WJ. The double-sidedness of cough in the elderly. Respir Physiol Neurobiol 2018;257:65–9
  14. Hassan SA, Sheikh FN, Jamal