SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Medicine Science / 2021 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 4

Factors affecting recurrence following arthroscopic Bankart repair in recreational athletes

Erdal UZUN
Abdulhamit MİSİR
Gökhan SAYER
Ahmet GÜNEY
Pages
1243–1248
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Contact sports, glenoid bone loss, Hill-Sachs lesions and smoking habit were associated with recurrence after ABRs

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Detailed evaluation for recurrence following arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR)s is important to develop strategies to decrease recurrence rates.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 67 consecutive ABRs (63 males, 4 females) with a minimum 5-year follow-up were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Contact sports, glenoid bone loss, Hill-Sachs lesions and smoking habit were associated with recurrence after ABRs
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Detailed evaluation for recurrence following arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR)s is important to develop strategies to decrease recurrence rates. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes following ABR and to investigate clinical, functional and demographic data by recurrence status in recreational athletes. A total of 67 consecutive ABRs (63 males, 4 females) with a minimum 5-year follow-up were included in the study. Pre- and post-operative clinical and functional outcomes were evaluated using VAS, shoulder ROM, ASES, UCLA, Constant-Murley, Oxford Instability and Rowe scores. Patient characteristics were evaluated to investigate the correlation with the outcomes. Factors associated with recurrence were also evaluated. The mean age was 30.8 ± 7.7 years and the mean follow-up was 87.7 ± 19.1 months. Good to excellent postoperative functional and clinical outcomes were obtained in the last follow-up compared with the baseline (p<0.001). Eleven shoulders (16.5%) experienced recurrent instability. Contact sports, glenoid bone loss, Hill-Sachs lesions and smoking habit were associated with recurrence status (p=0.007, p=0.043, p=0.023, p=0.017, respectively). Only postoperative abduction degree was significantly higher in recurrence (-) patients compared to recurrence (+) patients (p<0.001). No major complications were occurred in peri- or post-operative period. Forty-seven patients returned to their preoperative sports activity levels. Good to excellent mediumto long-term functional and clinical outcomes were achieved after ABR. Contact sports, glenoid bone loss, Hill-Sachs lesions and smoking habit were associated with recurrence after ABRs

🔖

Cite This Article

UZUN, E., MİSİR, A., SAYER, G., GÜNEY, A. (2021). Factors affecting recurrence following arthroscopic Bankart repair in recreational athletes. Medicine Science, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 4, 1243–1248. https://ajindex.com/articles/407136

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Walton J, Paxinos A, Tzannes A, et al. The unstable shoulder in the adolescent athlete. Am J Sports Med. 2002;30:758–67
  2. Castagna A, Markopoulos N, Conti M, et al. Arthroscopic bankart sutureanchor repair: radiological and clinical outcome at minimum 10 years of follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38:2012–6
  3. Archetti Netto N, Tamaoki MJS, Lenza M, et al. Treatment of Bankart lesions in traumatic anterior instability of the shoulder: A randomized controlled trial comparing arthroscopy and open techniques. Arthroscopy. 2012;28:900–8
  4. Hantes ME, Venouziou AI, Liantsis AK, et al. Arthroscopic repair for chronic anterior shoulder instability: a comparative study between patients with Bankart lesions and patients with combined Bankart and superior labral anterior posterior lesions. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37:1093–8
  5. An VVG, Sivakumar BS, Phan K, et al. A systematic review and metaanalysis of clinical and patient-reported outcomes following two procedures for recurrent traumatic anterior instability of the shoulder: Latarjet procedure vs. Bankart repair. J shoulder Elb Surg. 2016;25:853–63
  6. Murphy AI, Hurley ET, Hurley DJ, et al. Long-term outcomes of the arthroscopic Bankart repair: a systematic review of studies at 10-year follow-up. J shoulder Elb Surg. 2019;28:2084–9
  7. Owens BD, DeBerardino TM, Nelson BJ, et al. Long-term follow-up of acute arthroscopic Bankart repair for initial anterior shoulder dislocations in young athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37:669–73
  8. Ono Y, Davalos Herrera DA, Woodmass JM, et al. Long-term outcomes following isolated arthroscopic Bankart repair: a 9- to 12-year follow-up. JSES open access. 2019;3:189–93
  9. Mahure SA, Mollon B, Capogna BM, et al. Risk factors for recurrent instability or revision surgery following arthroscopic Bankart repair. Bone Joint J. 2018;100–B(3):324–30
  10. Donohue MA, Mauntel TC, Dickens JF. Recurrent shoulder instability after primary Bankart repair. Sports Med Arthrosc. 2017;25:123–30
  11. Locher J, Wilken F, Beitzel K, et al. Hill-Sachs off-track lesions as risk factor for recurrence of instability after arthroscopic Bankart repair. Arthroscopy. 2016;32:1993–9
  12. Randelli P, Ragone V, Carminati S, et al. Risk factors for recurrence after Bankart repair a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;20:2129–38
  13. Moore TK, Hurley ET, Rowe DN, et al. Outcomes following arthroscopic Bankart repair in female patients. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2020;29:1332-6
  14. Horst K, Vo