Journals / Retina-Vitreus / 2021 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 3

Epidemiological and Clinical Characteristics of Childhood Open Eye Injuries in the South of Anatolia

Pages
271–280
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was found that there was bilateral OEI in 2 of 5 cases injured during the Syrian civil war and that 3 cases underwent evisceration.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: The aim of this study is to determine the demographic, epidemiological and etiological characteristics of pediatric patients presented with open eye injury (OEI).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of the children who presented with OEI to a tertiary eye care center between January, 2017 and July, 2019.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was found that there was bilateral OEI in 2 of 5 cases injured during the Syrian civil war and that 3 cases underwent evisceration.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Purpose: The aim of this study is to determine the demographic, epidemiological and etiological characteristics of pediatric patients presented with open eye injury (OEI). Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of the children who presented with OEI to a tertiary eye care center between January, 2017 and July, 2019. The cases were stratified into two groups as preschool (2-5years) and school-age (6-16years) children. Results: The study included 39 eyes of 37 cases. The mean age was 7.38±4.01 years and male: female ratio was 1.85. The study included 22 eyes of 22 preschool and 17 eyes of 15 school-age children. It was seen that the most common OEIs were OEI by a sharp object (25 cases; 64.1%), penetrating OEI (35 cases; 89,7%), zone I OEI (19 cases; 48.7%), corneoscleral OEI (19 cases; 48.7)) and small OEI (<5 mm in size) (18 cases;46,2%). Intraocular foreign body was detected in 5 cases (12.8%). No significant relationship was found between lens damage and cause of trauma (p=0.427); whereas there was a significant correlation between size of injury and retinal detachment (p<0.0001 for both). It was found that there was bilateral OEI in 2 of 5 cases injured during the Syrian civil war and that 3 cases underwent evisceration. Conclusion: Unlike the children who were seriously injured in the war environment, it was determined that children in peace environment were exposed to OEI with milder symptoms, mostly by preventable reasons. The results of this study show the severe effects of war on children; in addition, it may help to raise awareness and take first steps for prevention of OEI in children in peace. Keywords: Eye injuries, open-globe injury, trauma.

🔖

Cite This Article

CAKMAK, A. I., KAKAÇ, A., KHALEQI, Z., CANKURTARAN, V., ÖZCAN, S. C., ELBEYLİ, A., ÇETİN, Ş. (2021). Epidemiological and Clinical Characteristics of Childhood Open Eye Injuries in the South of Anatolia. Retina-Vitreus, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 3, 271–280. https://ajindex.com/articles/406755

References (18)

  1. Négrel AD, Thylefors B. The global impact of eye injuries. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 1998; 5:143‑69
  2. Chiapella AP, Rosenthal AR. One year in an eye casualty clinic. Br J Ophthalmol. 1985; 69:865‑70
  3. Rapoport I, Romen M, Kinek M, et al. Eye injuries in children in Israel. A nationwide collaborative study. Arch Ophthalmol. 1990; 108:376-379
  4. Narang S, Gupta V, Simalandhi P, et al. Paediatric open globe injuries. Visual outcome and risk factors for endophthalmitis. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2004; 52:29-34
  5. Strahlman E, Elman M, Daub E, et al. Causes of pediatric eye injuries. A population based study. Arch Ophthalmol. 1990; 108:603-606
  6. Lithander J, Al Kindi H, Tonjum AM. Loss of visual acuity due to eye injuries among 6292 school children in the Sultanate of Oman. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1999; 77:697-99
  7. Parver LM, Dannenberg AL, Blacklow B, et al. Characteristics and causes of penetrating eye injuries reported to the National Eye Trauma Registry, 1985-1991. Public Health Rep 1993; 108: 625-30
  8. Pieramici DJ, MacCumber MW, Humayun MU, et al. Open globe injury. Update on types of injuries and visual results. Ophthalmology. 1996; 103(11):1798-803
  9. Kuhn F, Morris R, Witherspoon CD, et al. A standardized classification of ocular trauma. Ophthalmology. 1996; 103:240- 243
  10. Pieramici DJ, Sternberg P Jr, Aaberg TM Sr, et al. A system for classifying mechanical injuries of the eye (globe). The Ocular Trauma Classification Group. Am J Ophthalmol. 1997; 123:820- 831
  11. Brophy M, Sinclair SA, Hostetler SG, et al. Pediatric eye injury related hospitalizations in the United States. Pediatrics. 2006; 117:1263-71
  12. Thylefors B. Epidemiological patterns of ocular trauma. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol. 1992; 20:95‑8
  13. Hsieh DA, Stout JW, Lee RB, Gaydos JC. The incidence of eye injuries at three U.S. Army installations. Mil Med. 2003; 168:101-5
  14. Wong TY, Klein BE, Klein R. The prevalence and 5‑year incidence of ocular trauma. The Beaver Dam Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 2000; 107:2196‑202
  15. Kahraman A, Özkan M, Durmus M. Child injuries in the Syrian Civil War. Turk J Plast Surg. 2019; 27:123-6
  16. Augsburger JJ, Corrêa ZM. Ophthalmic trauma. In: Vaughan & Asbury′s General Ophthalmology. 18 th ed. New York: McGraw- Hill; 2011
  17. Negrel AD, Thylefors B. The global impact of eye injuries. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 1998;5: 143-69
  18. De Juan Jr E, Sternberg Jr P, Michels RG. Penetrating ocular injuries. Types of injuries and visual results. Ophthalmology. 19