Journals / Etlik Veteriner Mikrobiyoloji Dergisi / 1999 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2

DNA İmmunization

DNA İmmunizasyonu

Pages
73–85
Publication Date
1999-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

A comparison between DNA-mediated and conventional vaccination by evaluating its advantages and disadvantages were also mentioned.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:DNA immunization represents a new and promising approach for the prevention and therapy of many infectious and non-infectious diseases.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Direct inoculations of vaccine DNAs (which are produced by doning DNA sequences encoding the protein or proteins to be used as immunogens into an eukaryotic expressian vector, in other words. by the help of the recombinant technology) into animals generate antibody, cytotoxic T cell (CTL) and protective immune respanses that have good longevity, with even single doses of DNA.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:A comparison between DNA-mediated and conventional vaccination by evaluating its advantages and disadvantages were also mentioned.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:DNA · İmmunizasyon · Etlik Veteriner Mikrobiyoloji Dergisi

Abstract

DNA immunization represents a new and promising approach for the prevention and therapy of many infectious and non-infectious diseases. With this approach, vaccines made of DNA are being developed as a form of gene therapy that use the patient's own cellular machinery to make foreign proteins that stimulate an immune response. Direct inoculations of vaccine DNAs (which are produced by doning DNA sequences encoding the protein or proteins to be used as immunogens into an eukaryotic expressian vector, in other words. by the help of the recombinant technology) into animals generate antibody, cytotoxic T cell (CTL) and protective immune respanses that have good longevity, with even single doses of DNA. Protective immune respanses can be generated by skin and muscle inoculations of DNA. Immunizations can be accomplished by injecting DNA in saline, or by using a gene gun topropel DNA-coated gold beads into cells. In this paper DNA vaccine production, vaccination techniques, current and potential uses of DNA immunization were reviewed. A comparison between DNA-mediated and conventional vaccination by evaluating its advantages and disadvantages were also mentioned.

Özet

DNA immunizasyonu birçok infeksiyöz ve infeksiyöz olmayan hastalıklardan korunma ve bunların sağaltımları için yeni ve umut vadeden bir yaklaşım sunmaktadır. Bu derlernede DNA aşısı üretimi, aşılama teknikleri ve DNA aşılarının kullanım alanları gözden geçirildi. DNA aşılarının avantaj ve dezavantajları da değerlendirilerek konvansiyonel aşılarla karşılaştırılması yapıldı.

🔖

Cite This Article

SAREYYÜPOĞLU, B., İZGÜR, M. (1999). DNA İmmunization. Etlik Veteriner Mikrobiyoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2, 73–85. https://ajindex.com/articles/406464

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Arda M (1995): Biyoteknoloji (Bazı Temel İlkeler). Kükem Derneği Bilimsel Yayınlar No: 3, Ankara.
  2. Arda M (1997): Temel Mikrobiyoloji. Medisan Yayınevi.
  3. Ankara.
  4. Austyn JM, Hankins DF, Larsen CP, et al (1994): Isolation and characterization of dendritic cells from mouse heart and kidney. In: Plasmid DNA vaccination: mechanism of antigen presentation. Springer Sernin Immunopathol (1997) 19: 139-145
  5. Boyer JD, Ugen KE, Wang B, et al (1997): Protection of chimpanzees from high dose heterologous HN-1 challange by DNA vaccination. In: DNA immunization. Immunol Cell Biol (1997) 75: 360-363
  6. Condon C, Watkins SC, Celluzi CM, et al (1996): DNA-based immunization by in vivo transfection of dendritic cells. In: Plasmid DNA vaccination: mechanism of antigen presentation. Springer Sernin Immunopathol (1997) 19: 139-145
  7. Corr M, Lee JD, Carson AD, Tighe H (1996): Gene vaccination with naked plasmid DNA: mechanism of CTL priming. J Exp Med, 184: 1555-1560
  8. Corr M, Tighe H (1997): Plasmid DNA vaccination: mechanism of antigen presentation. Springer Sernin Immunopathol 19: 139- 145 Diker KS (1998): İmmunoloji. Medisan Yayınları Serisi: 37, Ankara.
  9. Donnelly JJ, Friedman A, Martinez D, et al (1995): Freelinical efficacy of a prototype DNA vaccine: Enhanced protection against drift in influenza virus. In: DNA immunization. Immunol Cell Biol (1997) 75: 360-363
  10. Doolan DL, Sedegah M, Hedstrom RC, et al (1996): Circumventing genetic restriction of protection against malaria with multigene DNA immunization: CD8+ T cell-. interferon-y-, and nitric oxide-dependent immunity. In: DNA immunization. Immunol Cell Biol (1997) 75: 360-363
  11. Fynan EF, Webster RG, Fuller DH, et al (1993): DNA vaccines: protective immunizations by parenteral, mucosal and gene-gun inoculations. In: Nucleic acid vaccines: an overview. Vaccine (1997) 15: 785-787.
  12. Hohlfeld R, Engel AG (1994): The immunobiology of muscle. In: Plasmid DNA vaccination: mechanism of antigen presentation. Springer Sernin Immunopathal (1997) 19: 139-145
  13. Ito YA (1960): A tumor-producing factor extracted by phenol from papillomatous tissue (Shope) of cottontail rabbits. In: DNA immunization. Immunol Cell Biol (1997) 75: 360-363
  14. Lai WC, Pakes SP, Ren K, et al (1997): Therapeutic effect of DNA immunization of genetically susceptible mice infected with virulent Mycoplasma pulmonis. J Immunol 158: 2513-2516
  15. Manickan E, Karem KL, Rouse BT (1997): DNA vaccinesa modern gimmick or a boon to vaccinology. Crit Rev Immunol 17: 139-154
  16. Mölling K (1997)