SavedAdd your journal

Journals / A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 3

The histology atlas of campus form: A framework to explore liveability and sustainability in university campuses

Haniye RAZAVIVAND FARD
Yüksel DEMİR
Marco TRISCIUOGLIO
Pages
87–102
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The ultimate objective of this study is to investigate the campus form attributes on the ability to generate liveability and sustainability.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper focuses on the concept of university campus form, aiming at exploring the sustainability and liveability parameters in relation to campus form.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Then, it has done a content analysis of fifty university campus masterplans, selected from throughout the world to identify common strategies, and actions of campus development plans.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The ultimate objective of this study is to investigate the campus form attributes on the ability to generate liveability and sustainability.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

This paper focuses on the concept of university campus form, aiming at exploring the sustainability and liveability parameters in relation to campus form. The research intends to provide a theoretical framework to evaluate physical and morphological dimensions of campus form which affect sustainability and liveability of campus setting and surrounding urban context. The study primarily has conducted an extensive literature review on the subjects of sustainability, liveability, urban form, and university campus physical features. Then, it has done a content analysis of fifty university campus masterplans, selected from throughout the world to identify common strategies, and actions of campus development plans. Afterward, it has identified the principal criteria which influence the sustainability and liveability of campus form. To evaluate the university precincts according to the proposed set of criteria, a Histology Atlas of Campus Form has been developed which provides a model to measure each morphological dimension of campus according to a 3-point Likert scale system. The developed model has been applied to case studies to assess their performance. The ultimate objective of this study is to investigate the campus form attributes on the ability to generate liveability and sustainability.

🔖

Cite This Article

FARD, H. R., DEMİR, Y., TRISCIUOGLIO, M. (2019). The histology atlas of campus form: A framework to explore liveability and sustainability in university campuses. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 3, 87–102. https://ajindex.com/articles/406373

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Boyer, E.L. (1987). College: The undergraduate experience in America. New York, NY: Harper & Row. Caldenby, C. (2009). “Universitetet Og Byen – To Traditioner / The University and The City – Two Traditions.” In Campus Og Studiemiljø - Fysiske Rammer Til Morgendagens Universiteter | Campus and Study Environment - Physical Framework for Universities of the Future. Copenhagen: The Danish University and Property Agency under the auspices of the Danish Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation. Campos Calvo-Sotelo, P. (2014). From typological analysis to planning: modern strategies for university spatial quality, CIAN-Revista de Historia de las Universidades, 17/1 (2014), 31-58, ISSN: 1988-8503 / www.uc3m.es/cian. Chapman, M. (2006). American Places: In Search of the Twenty-first Century Campus, Westport, CT: American Council on Education/Praeger. Coulson, J., Roberts, P. and Taylor, I. (2011). University Planning and Architecture: The search for perfection. New York: Routledge. Dober, R.P. (1992). Campus Design. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Gehl, J. (1971). Life Between Buildings: Using Public Space. Revisited. Washington, Covelo, London: Island Press.
  2. Gehl, J. (2010). Cities for People. Washington D.C.: Island Press.
  3. Girardet, H. (2004). Cities people planet: liveable cities for a sustainable world. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Griffith, J.C. (1994) Open space preservation: An imperative for quality campus environments. The Journal of Higher Education 65: 645–669.
  4. Hajrasouliha, A. (2017). Master- planning the American campus: goals, actions, and design strategies. Urban Design International, Vol. 22, 4, 363–381.
  5. Hillier, B. and Julienne, H. (1984). The Social Logic of Space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  6. Jabareen, Y.R. (2006). Sustainable Urban Forms: Their Typologies, Models, and Concepts. Journal of Planning Education and Research. Vol 26, Issue 1. Jacobs, J. (1961). The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Random House. Jenks, M. Burton, E. and Williams, K. (2004). The Compact City: A Sustainable Urban Form? Taylor & Francis. ISBN 0203362373. Kenney, D. R., Dumont, R., & Kenney, G. S. (2005). Mission and place: Strengthening learning and community through campus design. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.
  7. Lynch, K. (1960). The Image of the City. The MIT Press.
  8. Lynch, K. (1981). A Theory of Good City Form. MIT Press.
  9. Norbert-Schulz. Ch. (1979).
  10. Genius Loci, Towards a Phenomenology of Architecture. New York: Rizzoli.