Journals / Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology / 2021 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 1

Therapeutic Efficacy of Sorafenib in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence After Liver Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Pages
30–41
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The primary outcome of interest was 1-year survival rate after sorafenib treatment, and the secondary endpoints included median overall survival (OS), time to progression (TTP), treatment response, and adverse events.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence is still threatening patient survival after liver transplantation (LT).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Data from 23 studies containing 411 patients were analyzed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The primary outcome of interest was 1-year survival rate after sorafenib treatment, and the secondary endpoints included median overall survival (OS), time to progression (TTP), treatment response, and adverse events.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence is still threatening patient survival after liver transplantation (LT). The efficacy and safety of sorafenib in the setting of post-LT recurrence are still equivocal. This study aims to disclose the efficacy and safety profile of sorafenib in treating post-LT HCC recurrence. Materials and Methods: Electronic databases were searched to retrieve relevant publications suitable for inclusion. Data from 23 studies containing 411 patients were analyzed. The primary outcome of interest was 1-year survival rate after sorafenib treatment, and the secondary endpoints included median overall survival (OS), time to progression (TTP), treatment response, and adverse events. Results: Patients with HCC recurrence after LT treated with sorafenib achieved a 1-year survival rate of 56.8%, with a median OS of 12.8 months and a median TTP of 6.0 months. Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that male gender (P = .048), TTP (P = .021), median duration of sorafenib (P = .021), diarrhea (P = .027), fatigue (P = .044), and partial response (P = .026) were associated with a better 1-year survival rate. In addition, sorafenib exerted a significant superior effect on OS compared with best supportive care in the setting of untreatable post-LT HCC recurrence. Conclusions: Based on the results of this meta-analysis, sorafenib therapy seems to be safe and feasible and exhibits survival benefit in patients with post-LT HCC recurrence. However, prospective randomized controlled trials with larger sample sizes and more rigorous study design are required to confirm the efficacy of sorafenib

🔖

Cite This Article

Lİ, Z., GAO, J., ZHENG, S., WANG, Y., XİANG, X., CHENG, Q., ZHU, J. (2021). Therapeutic Efficacy of Sorafenib in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence After Liver Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 1, 30–41. https://ajindex.com/articles/405622

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2015
  2. 136(5):E359-E386. [CrossRef] 2. Parkin DM. Global cancer statistics in the year 2000. Lancet Oncol. 2001
  3. 2(9):533-543. [CrossRef] 3. Yao FY, Ferrell L, Bass NM, et al. Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: expansion of the tumor size limits does not adversely impact survival. Hepatology. 2001
  4. 33(6):1394-1403. [CrossRef] 4. Forner A, Reig M, Bruix J. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet. 2018
  5. 391(10127):1301-1314. [CrossRef] 5. Davis E, Wiesner R, Valdecasas J, Kita Y, Rossi M, Schwartz M. Treatment of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2011
  6. 17(suppl 2):S162-S166. [CrossRef] 6. Welker MW, Bechstein WO, Zeuzem S, Trojan J. Recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation - an emerging clinical challenge. Transpl Int. 2013
  7. 26(2):109-118. [CrossRef] 7. Chok KSh. Management of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplant. World J Hepatol. 2015
  8. 7(8):1142-1148. [CrossRef] 8. de’Angelis N, Landi F, Carra MC, Azoulay D. Managements of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation: a systematic review. World J Gastroenterol. 2015
  9. 21(39):11185-11198. [CrossRef] 9. De’Angelis N, Landi F, Nencioni M, et al. Role of sorafenib in patients with recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation. Prog Transplant. 2016
  10. 26(4):348-355. [CrossRef] 10. Sotiropoulos GC, Nowak KW, Fouzas I, et al. Sorafenib treatment for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation. Transplant Proc. 2012
  11. 44(9):2754-2756. [CrossRef] 11. Sposito C, Mariani L, Germini A, et al. Comparative efficacy of sorafenib versus best supportive care in recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation: a case-control study. J Hepatol. 2013
  12. 59(1):59-66. [CrossRef] 12. Yoon DH, Ryoo BY, Ryu MH, et al. Sorafenib for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2010
  13. 40(8):768-773. [CrossRef] 13. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ. 2009
  14. b2535. [CrossRef] 14. Stang A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in metaanalyses. Eur J Epidemiol. 2010
  15. 25(9):603-605. [CrossRef] 15. De Simone P, Crocett