SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Neurosurgery / 2009 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 4

Kronik instabilitenin cerrahi tedavisinde dinamik vidalar ile dinamik rodların kullanımı: Prospektif klinik çalışma

Utilizing dynamic rods with dynamic screws in the surgical treatment of chronic instability: A prospective clinical study

Tuncay KANER
Mehdi SASANİ
Tunç ÖKTENOĞLU
Murat COŞAR
ALİ FAHİR ÖZER
Pages
319–326
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

CONCLUSION: We obtained good clinical results by utilizing dynamic rods with dynamic transpedicular screws.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:AIM: In this study, we examined the results of utilizing the agile posterior dynamic stabilization system with dynamic transpedicular screws in our patients.
📊
Key Findings & Data:MATERIAL and METHODS: Posterior dynamic instrumentation with agile rods and dynamic transpedicular screws was employed in 15 (seven male and eight female) patients (mean age = 42, ranging from 30 to 53).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:CONCLUSION: We obtained good clinical results by utilizing dynamic rods with dynamic transpedicular screws.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

AIM: In this study, we examined the results of utilizing the agile posterior dynamic stabilization system with dynamic transpedicular screws in our patients. MATERIAL and METHODS: Posterior dynamic instrumentation with agile rods and dynamic transpedicular screws was employed in 15 (seven male and eight female) patients (mean age = 42, ranging from 30 to 53). The average follow-up duration was 19 months (ranging from 12 to 25). The primary purpose for the surgery was degenerative disc disease. For subjective evaluation, patients underwent a physical examination utilizing the Oswestry disability index (ODI) and visual analogue scale (VAS). Radiographic parameters, including the angle of lumbar lordosis (LL), angle of segmental lordosis ( ) and intervertebral space (IVS), were also evaluated. Both subjective patient evaluations and radiographic parameters were assessed at the 3rd and 12th postoperative months. RESULTS: Significant postoperative improvements were observed in the ODI and VAS measurements (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in the LL, and IVS parameters. One patient experienced a broken screw. CONCLUSION: We obtained good clinical results by utilizing dynamic rods with dynamic transpedicular screws.

Özet

AMAÇ: Bu çalışmada, hastalarımızda uyguladığımız dinamik transpediküler vidalar ile agile posterior dinamik stabilizasyon sisteminin sonuçlarını inceledik. YÖNTEM ve GEREÇ: Agile rodlar ve dinamik transpediküler vidalardan oluşan posterior dinamik enstrümantasyon 15 (yedi erkek, sekiz bayan)hastada(ortalama yaş=42, 30 ile 53 arasında)kullanıldı. Ortalama takip süresi 19 aydır(12 ile 25 ay arasında). Cerrahi uygulamadaki primer ama dejeneratif disk hastalığıydı. Subjektif değerlendirmelerde fizik muayene, Oswestry sakatlık indeksi (ODI) ve visual analog skala (VAS) kullanıldı.Radyolojik parametreler olarak lomber lordoz açısı (LL),segmental lordoz açısı ( ) ve intervertebral mesafe (IVS) değerlendirildi. Hem subjektif hasta değerlendirmeleri hem de radyolojik parametreler postoperatif 3. ve 12. aylarda değerlendirildi. BULGULAR: ODI ve VAS ölçümlerinde önemli postoperatif d・elmeler glendi (P<0.05).LL, ve IVS parametrelerinde önemli farklılıklar yoktu. Bir hastada vida kırılması glendi. SONUÇ: Dinamik transpedik・er vidalar ile dinamik rodların beraber kullanımında iyi klinik sonuçar gledik.

🔖

Cite This Article

KANER, T., SASANİ, M., ÖKTENOĞLU, T., COŞAR, M., ÖZER, A. F. (2009). Kronik instabilitenin cerrahi tedavisinde dinamik vidalar ile dinamik rodların kullanımı: Prospektif klinik çalışma. Turkish Neurosurgery, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 4, 319–326. https://ajindex.com/articles/405219

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Aylott C, McKinlay KJ, Freeman BJC, DS McNally: The Dynamic Neutralization System for the Spine (Dynesys): Acute Biomechanical Effects on the Lumbar Spine. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (Br) 87(B): 1,39, 2005 2. Banwart JC, Asher M, Hassanein S: Iliac crest bone graft harvest donor site morbidity. A statistical evaluation. Spine 20: 1055-1060, 1995 3. Bothmann M, Kast E, Boldt GJ, Oberle J: Dynesys fixation for lumbar spine degeneration. Neurosurg Rev 31:189-196, 2007 4. Bozkus H, Senoglu M, Ozer AF, Sonntag VKH, Crawford NR. Comparative Stabilization Properties of Rigid and HingedDynamic Pedicle Screw Fixation Techniques. Spineweek 26-31 May 2008, Geneva-Switzerland (In press at J of Neurosurgery Spine) 5. Dubois G, De Germay B, Schaerer NS, Fennema P: Dynamic neutralization: A new concept for restabilization of the spine. In: Szpalski M, Gunzburg R, Pope MH, editors. Lumbal segmental instability. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins: 1999:233-240 6. Fairbank JCT, Pynsent PB: The oswestry disability index. Spine 25(22): 2940-2952, 2000 7. Fishgrund JS, Mackay M, Herkowitz HN, Brower R, Montgomery DM, Kurz LT: 1997 Volvo Award winner in clinical studies. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis: a prospective, randomized study comparing decompressive laminectomy and arthrodesis with and without spinal instrumentation. Spine 22: 2807-2812, 1997 8. Freudiger S,Dubois G,Lorrain M: Dynamic neurralizationof the lumbar spine confirmed on a new lumbar spine simulator in vitro. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 119:127-132, 1999 9. Fritzell P, Hagg O, Jonsson D, Nordwall A: Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. Cost effectiveness of lumbar fusion and nonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain in the Swedish lumbar spine study: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial from the Swedish lumbar spine study group. Spine 29(4):421-434, 2004 10. Fritzell P, Hagg O, Wessberg P, Nordwall A: Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. 2001 Volvo Award Winner in Clinical Studies: lumbar fusion versus nonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain. Spine 26(23):2521-2534, 2001 11. Frymoyer JW, Hanley EN, Howe J, Kuhlmann D, Matteri R: A comparison of radiologic findings in fusion and in nonfusion patients ten or more years following lumbar disc surgery. Spine 4:435-440, 1979 12. Frymoyer JW: Segmental instability. In Frymoyer JW (ed): The adult spine. New York: Raven Press, 1991: 1873-1891 13. Frymoyer SW, Selby DK: Segmental instability. Rationale for trea