Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2014 / Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 2

Comparison of disc and body volumes in degenerated and nondegenerated lumbar discs: a stereological study

Pages
237–242
Publication Date
2014-05-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, using VB and IVD volume ratios may not always yield reliable results.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:To carry out comparison and correlation analyses of the intervertebral disc (IVD) and vertebral body (VB) volumes in magnetic resonance (MR) images of patients with degenerated and nondegenerated lumbar discs.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and methods: MR images were examined retrospectively in 93 patients.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, using VB and IVD volume ratios may not always yield reliable results.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Key words: Degenerated intervertebral disc · lumbar vertebra · magnetic resonance imaging

Abstract

To carry out comparison and correlation analyses of the intervertebral disc (IVD) and vertebral body (VB) volumes in magnetic resonance (MR) images of patients with degenerated and nondegenerated lumbar discs. Materials and methods: MR images were examined retrospectively in 93 patients. Lumbar VB and IVD volumes in T1-T2 weighted sagittal MR images were calculated via the Cavalieri method, a stereological method. Volumetric changes in degenerated and nondegenerated discs were compared. Results: The percentages of degenerated IVDs were 12.9%, 12.9%, 28%, 50.5%, and 52% in discs from levels L1 to L5, respectively. There were no differences in VB volumes between the degenerated and nondegenerated groups for all lumbar vertebra levels. However, significant volumetric decreases were observed in degenerated IVDs for all lumbar vertebra levels, as compared to nondegenerated IVDs. Comparisons of VB volume and IVD volume ratios also revealed decreases, but they were significant only for levels L1 and L4. Conclusion: Disc volumes were found to be decreased, although vertebral bodies were not affected in degenerated IVD groups. However, using VB and IVD volume ratios may not always yield reliable results.

Özet

To carry out comparison and correlation analyses of the intervertebral disc (IVD) and vertebral body (VB) volumes in magnetic resonance (MR) images of patients with degenerated and nondegenerated lumbar discs. Materials and methods: MR images were examined retrospectively in 93 patients. Lumbar VB and IVD volumes in T1-T2 weighted sagittal MR images were calculated via the Cavalieri method, a stereological method. Volumetric changes in degenerated and nondegenerated discs were compared. Results: The percentages of degenerated IVDs were 12.9%, 12.9%, 28%, 50.5%, and 52% in discs from levels L1 to L5, respectively. There were no differences in VB volumes between the degenerated and nondegenerated groups for all lumbar vertebra levels. However, significant volumetric decreases were observed in degenerated IVDs for all lumbar vertebra levels, as compared to nondegenerated IVDs. Comparisons of VB volume and IVD volume ratios also revealed decreases, but they were significant only for levels L1 and L4. Conclusion: Disc volumes were found to be decreased, although vertebral bodies were not affected in degenerated IVD groups. However, using VB and IVD volume ratios may not always yield reliable results.

🔖

Cite This Article

KANER, T., SONGUR, A., TOKTAŞ, M., ALKOÇ, O. A., ESER, O., EFENDİOĞLU, M. (2014). Comparison of disc and body volumes in degenerated and nondegenerated lumbar discs: a stereological study. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 2, 237–242. https://ajindex.com/articles/383235

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Hutton WC, Malko JA, Fajman WA. Lumbar disc volume measured by MRI: effects of bed rest, horizontal exercise, and vertical loading. Aviat Space Environ Med 2003; 74: 73–78.
  2. Bilgic S, Sahin B, Sonmez OF, Odaci E, Colakoglu S, Kaplan S, Ergur H. A new approach for the estimation of intervertebral disc volume using the Cavalieri principle and computed tomography images. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2005; 107: 282–288. Cassar-Pullicino VN. MRI of the ageing and herniating intervertebral disc. Eur J Radiol 1998; 27: 214–228.
  3. Rannou F, Corvol M, Revel M, Poiraudeau S. Disk degeneration and disk herniation: the contribution of mechanical stress. Joint Bone Spine 2001; 68: 543–546.
  4. Yaşar K, Pehlivanoğlu F, Şengöz A, Şengöz G. Evaluation of radiological findings in 160 adult patients with tuberculous meningitis. Turk J Med Sci 2012; 42: 259–267.
  5. Odaci E, Sahin B, Sonmez OF, Kaplan S, Bas O, Bilgic S, Bek Y, Ergur H. Rapid estimation of the vertebral body volume: a combination of the Cavalieri principle and computed tomography images. Eur J Radiol 2003; 48: 316–326.
  6. Vurdem ÜE, Acer N, Ertekin T, Savranlar A, Topuz Ö, Keçeli M. Comparison of three volumetric techniques for estimating thyroid gland volume. Turk J Med Sci 2012; 42: 1299–1306.
  7. Gundersen HJG, Jensen EB. The efficiency of systematic sampling in stereology and its prediction. J Microsc 1987; 147: 229–263.
  8. Roberts N, Cruz-Orive LM, Reid NMK, Brodie DA, Bourne M, Edwards RH. Unbiased estimation of human body composition by the Cavalieri method using magnetic resonance imaging. J Microsc 1993; 171: 239–253.
  9. Sahin B, Emirzeoglu M, Uzun A, Incesu L, Bek Y, Bilgic S, Kaplan S. Unbiased estimation of the liver volume by the Cavalieri principle using magnetic resonance images. Eur J Radiol 2003; 47: 164–170.
  10. Diab KM, Ollmar S, Sevastik JA, Willers U, Svensson A. Volumetric determination of normal and scoliotic vertebral bodies. Eur Spine J 1998; 7: 282–288.
  11. Inoue H, Ohmori K, Miyasaka K, Hosoe H. Radiographic evaluation of the lumbosacral disc height. Skeletal Radiol 1999; 28: 638–643.
  12. Bibby SR, Jones DA, Lee RB, Yu J, Urban JPG. The pathophysiology of the intervertebral disc. Joint Bone Spine 2001; 68: 537–542. Prescher A. Anatomy and pathology of the aging spine. Eur J Radiol 1998; 27: 181–195.
  13. Rham MD, Hall BB. Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar fusion with instrumentation: a retrospective study. J Spinal Disord 1996; 9: 392–400.
  14. Kellgren JH, Lawrens JS. Osteoarthritis and disc degeneration in an urban populat