Journals / Turkish Neurosurgery / 2016 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 1

Demographical Aspects of Central Large Lumbar Disc Herniation

Pages
111–118
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

COnCluSIOn: The size of the large central disc herniation, physical activity, age and gender are major factors in the development of disc herniation

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:AIM: The purpose of this study was to investigate the risk factors for the development of the central large disc herniations and to compare the demographic data between central mass prolapse and broad-based central disc herniation.MATERIAl and METhODS: Between 2002 and 2007, 1630 patients underwent surgery and a large disc herniation was the main problem in 59 patients (3.6%).
📊
Key Findings & Data:RESulTS: Central large disc herniation was diagnosed in 59 patients consisting of 41 males and 18 females.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:COnCluSIOn: The size of the large central disc herniation, physical activity, age and gender are major factors in the development of disc herniation
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2002 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

AIM: The purpose of this study was to investigate the risk factors for the development of the central large disc herniations and to compare the demographic data between central mass prolapse and broad-based central disc herniation.MATERIAl and METhODS: Between 2002 and 2007, 1630 patients underwent surgery and a large disc herniation was the main problem in 59 patients (3.6%). We performed a retrospective analysis of the demographic data of these patients. Magnetic resonance (MR) images were evaluated according to the disc type and level. Variables were evaluated both at baseline and follow-up, with special emphasis on physical job characteristics, sports activities, and MR - based morphologic findings. RESulTS: Central large disc herniation was diagnosed in 59 patients consisting of 41 males and 18 females. The average age was 34.7 years. 36 patients had a central mass prolapse that occupied more than 50% of the spinal canal. Intraoperative observations confirmed that 29 out of 36 central disc prolapse patients (80.5%) had intact posterior longitudinal ligaments. Interestingly, the condition in these 29 patients was found to have a direct relation with age and occupation or other body training sports activities. COnCluSIOn: The size of the large central disc herniation, physical activity, age and gender are major factors in the development of disc herniation

🔖

Cite This Article

TOPUZ, K., EROĞLU, A., ŞİMŞEK, H., ATABEY, C., ÇETİNKAL, A., ÇOLAK, A. (2016). Demographical Aspects of Central Large Lumbar Disc Herniation. Turkish Neurosurgery, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 1, 111–118. https://ajindex.com/articles/404716

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Adams MA, Freeman BJ, Morrison HP, Nelson IW, Dolan P: Mechanical initiation of intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine 25(13):1625-1636,2000 2. Adams MA, Dolan P: Could sudden increases in physical activity cause degeneration of intervertebral discs? Lancet 350(9079):734- 735, 1997 3. Adams MA, Roughley PJ: What is intervertebral disc degeneration, and what causes it? Spine 31(18):2151-2161, 2006 4. Ahn SH, Ahn MW, Byun WM: Effect of the transligamentous extension of lumbar disc herniations on their regression and the clinical outcome of sciatica. Spine 25(4):475-480, 2000 5. Baldwin NG: Lumbar disc disease: The natural history. Neurosurg Focus 13(2):E2, 2002 6. Barlocher CB, Krauss JK, Seiler RW: Central lumbar disc herniation. Acta Neurochir 142(12):1369-1374, 2000 7. Battié MC, Videman T, Gill K, Moneta GB, Nyman R, Kaprio J, Koskenvuo M: 1991 Volvo Award in clinical sciences. Smoking and lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration: An MRI study of identical twins. Spine 16(9):1015-1021, 1991 8. Boos N, Weissbach S, Rohrbach H, Weiler C, Spratt KF, Nerlich AG: Classification of age-related changes in lumbar intervertebral discs: 2002 Volvo Award in basic science. Spine 27(23):2631- 2644, 2002 9. Battie MC, Videman T, Gibbons LE, Fisher LD, Manninen H, Gill K: Determinants of lumbar disc degeneration. A study relating lifetime exposures and magnetic resonance imaging findings in identical twins. 1995 Volvo Award in clinical sciences. Spine 20(24):2601-2612, 1995 10. Battie MC, Videman T, Parent E: Lumbar disc degeneration: Epidemiology and genetic influences. Spine 29:2679-2690, 2004 11. Bernard BP: Musculoskeletal disorders and workplace factors. A Critical Review of Epidemiologic Evidence for Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders of the Neck, Upper Extremity, and Low Back. Cincinnati: US Department of Health and Human Services, 1997 12. DePalma MJ, Bhargava A: Nonspondylolytic etiologies of lumbar pain in the young athlete. Curr Sports Med Rep 5(1):44-49, 2006 13. Dunn IF, Proctor MR, Day AL: Lumbar spine injuries in athletes. Neurosurg Focus 21(4):E4, 2006 14. Ebersold MJ, Quast LM, Bianco AJ: Results of lumbar discectomy in the pediatric patient. J Neurosurg 67(5):643-647, 1987 15. Farfan HF: Muscular mechanism of the lumbar spine and the position of power and efficiency. Orthop Clin North Am 6(1):135- 144,1975 16. Farfan HF: The biomechanical advantage of lordosis and hip extension for upright activity. Man as compared with other anthropoids. Spine