Journals / Turkish Neurosurgery / 2019 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 3

Analysis of Cavernous Malformations: Experience with 18 Cases

Pages
340–348
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Our 2 cases had giant CM and upto our knowledge the case with giant CM at the posterior fossa is the first giant CM at the posterior fossa in the English literature.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:AIM: To analyze the results of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or surgical treatment of 18 cases with cavernous malformation andreport 2 cases with unusual localization and size.MATERIAL and METHODS: We present 11 and 8 patients who underwent surgery and SRS between 2010 and 2018 respectively.The operated group comprised six men and five women (mean age, 33.6 years).
📊
Key Findings & Data:SRS was performed in five men and three women(mean age, 33.3 years).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Our 2 cases had giant CM and upto our knowledge the case with giant CM at the posterior fossa is the first giant CM at the posterior fossa in the English literature.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

AIM: To analyze the results of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or surgical treatment of 18 cases with cavernous malformation andreport 2 cases with unusual localization and size.MATERIAL and METHODS: We present 11 and 8 patients who underwent surgery and SRS between 2010 and 2018 respectively.The operated group comprised six men and five women (mean age, 33.6 years). SRS was performed in five men and three women(mean age, 33.3 years). All patients were diagnosed and followed-up with magnetic resonance imaging. Stereotactic navigation wasnot used for lesion localization. The lesion, including the area with hemosiderin, was easily excised using microsurgical approach.RESULTS: Except for recurrent headache, all symptoms of patients who underwent surgery resolved rapidly. Hemorrhage developedin two of our patients after SRS. One of them refused to undergo surgery and recovered completely with steroid therapy, whereasthe other underwent surgery after detection of cavernous malformation at the posterior fossa, with a dimension of 26.8×26.2 mmand occluding the fourth ventricle.CONCLUSION: In patients without significant preoperative morbidity risk, surgical excision is the gold standard of treatment. SRSis performed in surgically inaccessible, deeply located, multiple cavernous malformations in the brain stem and eloquent area. Ofnote, giant aneurysm is defined as an aneurysm with a diameter of at least 25 mm; however, there is no dimension threshold definedfor giant CM, and the size of giant aneurysm can be accepted as a valid criterion for giant CM. Our 2 cases had giant CM and upto our knowledge the case with giant CM at the posterior fossa is the first giant CM at the posterior fossa in the English literature.

🔖

Cite This Article

HACİYAKUPOGLU, E., YILMAZ, D. M., KINALI, B., AKBAŞ, T., HACIYAKUPOĞLU, S. (2019). Analysis of Cavernous Malformations: Experience with 18 Cases. Turkish Neurosurgery, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 3, 340–348. https://ajindex.com/articles/404425

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Award I, Stamates M: Cerebral cavernous malformation. In: Hargaugh RE, Shatfreg C, Couldwell WT, Mitched S (ed), Neurosurgery Knowledge Update. New York: Thime, 2015: 149-154 2. Bertalanffy H, Benes L, Migazawa T: Cerebral cavernomas in the adult. Neurosurgery Rev 25: 1-53, 2002 3. Bertalanffy H, Gilsbach MJ, Eggert RH, Seeger W: Microsurgery of deep-seated cavernous angiomas. Acta Neurochir 108: 91- 99, 1991 4. De Oliveira JG, Rassi-Neto A, Ferraz FA, Braga FM: Neurosurgical management of cerebral cavernous malformations. Neurosurg Focus 21:1-8,2006 5. Harrigon RM, Thomson GB: Pregnancy and Treatment of Vascular Disease. Philadelphia: Saunders, 2004 6. Jhawar S, Nadkarnı T, Goci A: Giant cerebral cavernous hemangiomas. Turkish Neurosurgery 22: 226-232, 2012 7. Johnson WE, Marchuk AD, Zabramski MS: The Genetics of Cerebral Cavernous Malformations. Philadelphia: Saunders, 2004 8. Kharkar S, Shuck J,Conway J, Rigamonti D: The natural history of conservatively managed symptomatic intramedullary spinal cord cavernomas. Neurosurgery 60: 865-872, 2007 9. Labauge P, DeniercBergametti F, Tournier–lasserve E: Genetics of cavernous angiomas. Lancet Neurol 6: 237-244, 2007 10. Lang J: Development of the cerebral arteries: Skul base and related structures stuttgardschattauer. Atlas of Clinical Anatomy Schattauer Stuttgart 23-29, 1995 11. Lawton MT, Vates GE, Quisnones-Hinojosa A, MC Donald WC, Marchuk DA, Young Wl: Giant infiltrative cavernous malformation. Neurosurgery 55: 979-980, 2004 12. Liquori LC, Berg JM, Siegel MA, Huang E, Jon S, Zawistowski JS, Stoffer T’P, Verlaan D, Balogun F, Hughes L, Leedom TP, Plummer NW, Cannella M, Ferdinando V, Maglione V, Squitieri F, Johnson EW, Rouleau GA, Ptacek L, Marchuk DA: Mutations an a gene encoding a novel protein containing a phosphotyrosine-binding domain cause type 2 cerebral cavernous malformations. Am J Hum Genet 73: 1459-1464, 2003 13. Mouchtouris N, Chalouh N, Chitale A, Starke MR, Tjoumakaris IS, Rosanwasser HR, Jabbour MP: Management of cerebral cavernous malformation the scientitic. World Journal 1:10-14, 2015 14. Porter WR, Delwiller WP, Spetzler FR: Intratentorial cavernous malformations. Philadelphia: Saunders, 2004 15. Revencu N, Vikkula M: Cerebral cavernous malformation. J Med Cenet 43:716-721, 2006 16. Rigamonti D, Spetzler FR: The association of venous and cavernous malformation. Acta Neurochir 92:100-105, 1998 17. Robinson JR, Awad IA, Little JR: Natural historyof cavernous angioma. J Neurosurg 75: 7