Journals / Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery / 2014 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 1

Long term radiological and clinical evaluation of simple cervical discectomy versus anterior fusion with peek cage

Servikal disk hernilerinin cerrahi tedavisinde basit diskektomi ile diskektomi sonrası peek kafes yerleştirilerek füzyon yapılan hastaların uzun dönem sonuçlarının klinik ve radyolojik olarak değerlendirilmesi

Pages
5–15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this study we compared the patients treated with simple anterior cervical discectomy versus anterior discectomy with PEEK cage fusion, due to cervical disc diseases in Bakirkoy Psychiatric and Neurological Diseases Hospital, Neurosurgical clinic between 2008-2009 retrospectively, and in both groups after surgery, resulting radiological (direct cervical radiographs, cervical sagittal CT images) results were discussed and compared in the literature.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Cervical spine is the most vibrant part of the spine and due to cervical disc disease and spondylosis reasons, surgical procedures such as decompression and stabilization is often done.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Cervical disc disease affects the spinal cord and the roots, mostly seen in 3rd and 4th decades.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this study we compared the patients treated with simple anterior cervical discectomy versus anterior discectomy with PEEK cage fusion, due to cervical disc diseases in Bakirkoy Psychiatric and Neurological Diseases Hospital, Neurosurgical clinic between 2008-2009 retrospectively, and in both groups after surgery, resulting radiological (direct cervical radiographs, cervical sagittal CT images) results were discussed and compared in the literature.
🔬Design:Lab & Field Experiment
📍Scope:2008-2009 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Cervical spine is the most vibrant part of the spine and due to cervical disc disease and spondylosis reasons, surgical procedures such as decompression and stabilization is often done. Cervical disc disease affects the spinal cord and the roots, mostly seen in 3rd and 4th decades. In cervical disc disease, radiculopathy, myelopathy, and sometimes a combination of both can be seen. Today, a variety of surgical methods for the solution of these diseases is still being debated. In this study we compared the patients treated with simple anterior cervical discectomy versus anterior discectomy with PEEK cage fusion, due to cervical disc diseases in Bakirkoy Psychiatric and Neurological Diseases Hospital, Neurosurgical clinic between 2008-2009 retrospectively, and in both groups after surgery, resulting radiological (direct cervical radiographs, cervical sagittal CT images) results were discussed and compared in the literature.

Özet

Servikal omurga, servikal disk hastalığı ve spondiloz gibi nedenlerle, dekompresyon ve stabilizasyon ameliyatlarının sıklıkla yapıldığı bir omurga bölümüdür ve omurganın en hareketli kısmıdır. Servikal disk hastalığı, omuriliği ve kökleri etkileyen, sıklıkla 3. ve 4. dekatta görülen bir hastalık grubudur. Servikal disk hastalığı, radikülopati, miyelopati ve bazen de her ikisi ile birlikte görülebilmektedir. Günümüzde bu bulguların çözümüne yönelik cerrahi yöntemler çeşitli olup halen tartışılmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, Bakırköy Ruh ve Sinir Hastalıkları Hastanesi Nöroşirurji kliniğinde 2008-2009 yılları arasında servikal disk hastalığı nedeniyle anterior basit diskektomi ve diskektomiye ilaveten PEEK kafes ile füzyon uygulanan hastalar, retrospektif olarak değerlendirilmiş ve her iki grupta cerrahi sonrası elde edilen radyolojik (direkt servikal grafiler, servikal sagittal BT görüntüler) sonuçlar literatür eşliğinde karşılaştırılarak tartışılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖKÇEDAĞ, A., OFLUOĞLU, A. E., HACİYAKUPOGLU, E., BAYDIN, Ş. S., ÖZLÜ, H. M., ABDALLAH, A., EMEL, E. (2014). Long term radiological and clinical evaluation of simple cervical discectomy versus anterior fusion with peek cage. Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 1, 5–15. https://ajindex.com/articles/212724

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Bagby GW. Arthrodesis by the distraction-comp- ression method using a stainless steel implant. Orthopedics 1988; 11: 931-934
  2. Brantigan JW, Mc Afee PC, Cunningham BW, Wang H, Orbegoso CM. Interkorporal lomber fusion using a carbon fiber cage implant versus allograft bone. Spine 1994; 19: 1436-1444
  3. Bridwell KH, DeWald RL.The Textbook of Spinal Surgery, 2nd Edition, Lippincott-Raven Publishers, Phi- ladelphia, 1997
  4. Brigham CD, Tsahakis PJ. Anterior cervical fo- raminotomy andfusion. Surgical technique and results. Spine 1995; 20 (7): 766-770
  5. Caspar W, Barbier DD, Klara PM: Anterior cervi- cal fusion and Caspar Plate stabilization for cervical trau- ma. Neurosurgery 1989; 25: 491-502
  6. Clements DH, O’Leary PF. Anterior cervical dis- cectomy and fusion. Spine 1990;15: 1023-1025
  7. Cloward RB. The anterior approach for removal of ruptured cervical discs. J Neurosurgery 1958; 15: 602- 616
  8. Dvorak J, Sandler A. Historical perspective: Hu- bert von Luschka, pioneer of clinical anatomy. Spine 1994; 19: 2478-2482
  9. Fielding WJ. Cervical spine surgery past, present and future potential. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1985; 200: 284- 290
  10. Grisoli F, Graziani N, Fabrizi AP, et al. anterior cervical discectomy without fusion for treatment of late- ral cervical disc extrusion: A follow-up of 120 cases. Neu- rosurgery 1986; 24: 853-859
  11. Herkowitz HN. The surgical management of cer- vical radicolopathy and myelopathy. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1989; 239: 94-108
  12. Herkowitz HN, Kurz Lt, Overholt DP. Surgical management of cervical disc disease. In: Rothman RH, Simeone FA (ed): The Spine. 3rd Ed., WB Saunders, Phi- ledelphia, 1992; pp: 597-608
  13. Herzberger EE, Chandler A, Bear NE, Kindschi LG. Anterior interbody fusion in the treatment or certa- in disorders of the cervical spine. Clin Orthop 1962; 24: 83-93
  14. Hilibrand AS, Carlston GD, Palumbo MA, Jones PK, Bohlman HH. Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previus anterior cervical arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg 1999; 81-A:519-528
  15. Hirsch C. Cervical disc rupture: diagnosis and therapy. Acta Orthop Scan 164; 30: 172-186
  16. Hunter LY, Braunstein EM, Bailey RW: Radiog- raphic changes following anterior cervical fusion. Spine 1980; 5; 399-401
  17. Iseda T,Goya T, Nakano S, Kodama T,Moriyama T, Wakisaka S. Serial changes in signal intensities of the adjasent discs on T2 weighted sagital images after surgical treatment of cervical spondyloss: Anterior interbody fu- sio