Journals / Turkish Journal of Orthodontics / 2021 / Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 1

Comparison of Genial Tubercule Anatomy Based on Age and Gender

Pages
46–53
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As the age of the patients increased, a decrease in the vertical values of the genial tubercle was observe

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: In our study, it was aimed to determine whether there were differences in genial tubercle dimensions depending on age and gender.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: In this study, 220 cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of patients (110 female and 110 male) between the ages of 20-80 years were obtained from the archive of İzmir Katip Çelebi University Faculty of Dentistry.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As the age of the patients increased, a decrease in the vertical values of the genial tubercle was observe
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: In our study, it was aimed to determine whether there were differences in genial tubercle dimensions depending on age and gender. Methods: In this study, 220 cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of patients (110 female and 110 male) between the ages of 20-80 years were obtained from the archive of İzmir Katip Çelebi University Faculty of Dentistry. All patients were divided into decade groups according to their age, and each decade group was divided into two subgroups according to gender. The genial tubercle was defined radiologically using axial, coronal and sagittal sections as well as 3D reconstruction image with NNT software program. Sagittal, vertical and horizontal dimensions of the genial tubercle were measured and statistically analyzed. Results: There was a weak negative correlation between age groups and vertical values (r=-0.142; p=0.036) whereas the correlation coefficients between age groups and sagittal and horizontal values were not statistically significant (r=-0.043; p=0.530 and r=-0.039; p=0.563). There was a strong positive correlation between vertical and sagittal values in men (r=0.705, p<0.001) and women (r=0.714, p<0.001) in the whole group. There was a weak positive correlation between horizontal and sagittal, horizontal and vertical values in men (r=0.362, p<0.001; r=0.231, p<0.001) and women (r=0.304, p<0.001; r=0.257, p=0.007) in the whole group. Conclusion: The vertical and horizontal dimensions of genial tubercle of men were higher than that of women. As the age of the patients increased, a decrease in the vertical values of the genial tubercle was observe

🔖

Cite This Article

ÜNAL, B. K., HANCI, İ. H., AYTUĞAR, E., ELMALI, F., KARADEDE, B., BÜYÜK, Ö., ÜNAL, N., KARADEDE, M. İ. (2021). Comparison of Genial Tubercule Anatomy Based on Age and Gender. Turkish Journal of Orthodontics, Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 1, 46–53. https://ajindex.com/articles/403483

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Bishara SE. Textbook of Orthodontics. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company; 2001.p.43-8
  2. Enlow DH, Hans MG. Essentials of facial growth. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company; 1996.p.1-110
  3. Creutz, U. Architecture of the human skullcap in the region of the parts bregmatica suturae sagittalis- I. Age dependence. Gegen- baurs Morphol Jahrab 1977; 123: 666-88
  4. Skrzat J, Brzegowy P, Walocha J, Wojciechowski W. Age dependent changes of the diploe in the human skull. Folia Morphologica 2004; 63: 67-70
  5. Bartlett SP, Grossman R, Whitaker LA. Age-Related Changes of the Cra- niofacial Skeleton. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992; 90: 592-600. [Crossref] 6. Treacy P. The Science of Facial Aging. Global Press Release Distribu- tion (www.prlog.org) 2009: 1: (1 screens). Available From: https:// www.prlog.org/10299776-the-science-of-facial-aging.html
  6. Nejaim Y, Moreira DD, Fernandes ABN, de Souza MMG, Groppo FC, Neto FH. Evaluation of the morphology of the genial tubercle using cone-beam computed tomography. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018; 56: 155-6. [Crossref] 8. Moss ML. Twenty Years of Functional Cranial Analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofac 1972; 61: 479-85. [Crossref] 9. Enlow DH. Postnatal craniofacial growth and development. J Plastic Surgery 1990; 4: 2496-514
  7. Santos-Oller JM, Junquera Gutierrez LM, De Vicente Rodriguez JC, Llorente Pendas S. Spontaneous fracture of hypertrophied genial tubercles. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1992; 74: 28-9. [Crossref] 11. Lee SY, Choi DS, Jang I, Song GS, Cha BK. The genial tubercle: A pro- spective novel landmark for the diagnosis of mandibular asymme- try. Korean J Orthod 2017; 47: 50-8. [Crossref] 12. Păuna M, Babiuc I, Farcasiu T. Prosthodontic management of an ex- treme atrophy of the mandible correlated with a prominent genial tubercle-A clinical report. Revue roumaine de morphologie et em- bryologie. 2015; 1: 867-70
  8. Solomon EG. A critical analysis of complete denture impression procedures: contribution of early prosthodontists in India-part I. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2011; 11: 172-82. [Crossref] 14. Voon YS, Patil PG. Safe zone in anterior mandible related to the ge- nial tubercle for implant osteotomy in a Chinese-Malaysian popula- tion: A CBCT study. J Prosthet Dent 2018; 119: 568-73. [Crossref] 15. Silverstein K. Genioglossus muscle attachments: an anatomic anal- ysis and the implications for genioglossus advancement. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000; 90: 686-8. [Crossref] 16. Singh IB. Esse