Journals / Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 2

3D evaluation of the effects of traumatic surgical techniques on Vomer bone volume and morphology in the treatment of lip and palate clefts

Pages
187–195
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the functional matrix theory, scar tissue formation and lack of Vomer-maxilla fusion cannot stimulate the further development of the anterior cranial bones, leading to shorter anterior cranial base.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:BACKGROUND: Cleft lip/palate (CLP) deformity is the most common congenital facial anomaly.
📊
Key Findings & Data:METHODS: The images of a total of 30 patients aged between 9 and 12 years which were recorded with computed tomography were retrospectively analyzed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the functional matrix theory, scar tissue formation and lack of Vomer-maxilla fusion cannot stimulate the further development of the anterior cranial bones, leading to shorter anterior cranial base.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cleft lip/palate (CLP) deformity is the most common congenital facial anomaly. In this study, it was aimed to eval uate the changes in volume and shape of Vomer bone after CLP repair surgery. METHODS: The images of a total of 30 patients aged between 9 and 12 years which were recorded with computed tomography were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into three groups: No syndrome, operated for unilateral CLP group (n=10), no syndrome, operated for bilateral CLP group (n=10), and control group (n=10) with no syndrome, no operation history, or no lip/ palate deformities. Data of the patients were transferred to a software program and a new three-dimensional image was created for the Vomer. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in the Sella-Nasion lengths, Vomer base lengths, and Vomer vertical lengths among the three groups. However, the Vomer bone volume of the patients with bilateral CLP was found to be statistically significantly higher than the control group. CONCLUSION: We can conclude that more bone formation may be observed due to the periosteal reaction following bilateral Vomer flap elevation or during maxillary growth, tension on the palatal flap may be increased new bone formation by pulling the bilat eral Vomer flap if it is elevated and sutured palatal mucoperiosteal flap in the early period. Our findings have led us to the conclusion that size and volume of the Vomer bone can be significantly affected by environmental factors. According to the functional matrix theory, scar tissue formation and lack of Vomer-maxilla fusion cannot stimulate the further development of the anterior cranial bones, leading to shorter anterior cranial base.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÜNAL, B. K., KOCAASLAN, N. D., KARADEDE, B., ÇELEBİLER, Ö. B. (2022). 3D evaluation of the effects of traumatic surgical techniques on Vomer bone volume and morphology in the treatment of lip and palate clefts. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 2, 187–195. https://ajindex.com/articles/644043

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Chaisrisookumporn N, Stella JP, Epker BN, Worth F. Anthropometric profile evaluation of the midface in patients with cleft lip and palate. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1995;80:127–36
  2. Göyenç Y, Karadede İ, Baran S, Şener E. Dudak damak yarıkları sınıfla ması ve dağılımı, İ.Ü. Diş Hek Fak Derg 1993;27:17–21
  3. Moss ML. Vertical growth of the human face. Am J Orthodont 1964;50:359–76
  4. Moss ML, Bromberg B. The passive role of nasal septal cartilage in mid facial growth. Plast Reconstr Surg 1968;41:536–42
  5. Ülgen M, Ortodonti, Anomaliler, Sefalometri, Etioloji, Büyüme ve Gelişim. İstanbul: Tanı, Yeditepe Üniversity; 1999
  6. Moss ML. Neurotrophic processes in orofacial growth. J Dent Res 1971;50 Suppl:492–4
  7. Millard D Jr., Latham RA. Improved surgical and dental treatment of clefts. Plast Reconstr Surg 1990;86:856–71
  8. Kimes KR, Mooney MP, Sıegel MI, Todhunter JS. Growth rate of the vomer in normal and cleft lip and palate human fetal specimens. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1992;29:38–42; discussion 42–3
  9. Siegel MI, Mooney MP, Kimes KR, Todhunter JT. Analyses of size vari ability of the human normal and cleft palate fetus nasal capsule by means of three-dimensional computer reconstruction of histologic preparations. Cleft Palate J 1987;24:190–9
  10. Sobol DL, Allori AC, Carlson AR, Pien IJ, Watkins SE, Aylsworth AS. Nasal airway dysfunction in children with cleft lip and cleft palate: results of a cross-sectional population-based study, with anatomical and surgical considerations. Plastic and reconstructive surgery 2016;138:1275–85
  11. Ferguson MW. Palatal shelf elevation in the wistar rat fetus. J Anat 1978;125:555–7
  12. Sakizlioglu I, Frommer J, Shiere FR. Prenatal development of the vomer in normal and cleft palate mice. Dev Dyn 1974;141:433–9
  13. Roux PJ. Memoire sur la staphylorraphie, ou’il suture le voile du palais. [Article in French]. Arch Sci Med 1925;7:516–38
  14. Goldwyn RM. Bernhard von langenbeck: His life and legacy. Plast Re constr Surg 1969;44:248–54
  15. Perko M. The history of treatment of cleft lip and palate. Prog Pediatr Surg 1986;20:238–51
  16. Rogers BO. History of cleft lip and palate treatment. In: Grabb WC, ed itor. Cleft Lip and Palate. Boston; MA: Little, Brown; 1971. p. 142–69
  17. Rogers BO. Cleft palate surgery prior to 1816. In: McDowell F, editor. The Source Book of Plastic Surgery. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Wil liams and Wilkins; 1977. p. 248
  18. Bill J, Proff P, Bayerlein T, Weingaertner J, Fanghanel J,