Journals / The anatolian journal of family medicine (Online) / 2021 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3

Vaccine Refusal from the Family Doctors’ Perspective: What has Changed with the COVID-19 Pandemic?

Pages
218–225
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Considering the increasing social media activity during the pandemic process, accurate information activities on vaccination should be planned.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: This study aimed to determine society's tendency to vaccination from the views of family physicians during the COVID-19 pandemic.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: The population of the study was family physicians working in primary care and the data collection was done in November 2019 and December 2020 in the Erzurum province of Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Considering the increasing social media activity during the pandemic process, accurate information activities on vaccination should be planned.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objectives: This study aimed to determine society's tendency to vaccination from the views of family physicians during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: The population of the study was family physicians working in primary care and the data collection was done in November 2019 and December 2020 in the Erzurum province of Turkey. In 2019 and 2020, the total number of family physicians working in Erzurum city were 135 and 134, respectively. The participation rates in both study periods were 120 doctors (around 88.9-89.5% response rate). Results: The medians of the physicians’ durations in the profession in 2019 and 2020 were 8.0 (4.0-11.0) years and 8.0 (3.0-12.0) years, respectively (p=0.990). The proportion of doctors who perceived social media as the reason for vaccination refusal increased from 56 (46.7%) to 92 (76.7%) within one year (p<0.001). Besides, 22 (18.3%) of the participants, who claimed that the patient prefers catching the disease instead of being vaccinated in 2019, had increased to 45 (37.5%) in 2020 (p<0.001). Furthermore, 103 (85.8%) of the participants reported that adult vaccination rates have increased with the COVID-19 pandemic. Also, the proportion of doctors, who takes a signed refusal instead of convincing the anti-vaxxers, had increased to 96 (80.0%) from 73 (60.8%) (p=0.001). Conclusion: The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly influenced the views of family physicians on the impact of social media on vaccine refusal. Considering the increasing social media activity during the pandemic process, accurate information activities on vaccination should be planned.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇALIKOĞLU, E. O. (2021). Vaccine Refusal from the Family Doctors’ Perspective: What has Changed with the COVID-19 Pandemic?. The anatolian journal of family medicine (Online), Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3, 218–225. https://ajindex.com/articles/403171

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. National Vaccine Advisory Committee. Protecting the public's health: critical functions of the Section 317 Immunization Program-a report of the National Vaccine Advisory Committee. Public Health Rep 2013;128(2):78-95
  2. McNeil MM, DeStefano F. Vaccine-associated hypersensitivity. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2018;141(2):463-72
  3. Andre FE, Booy R, Bock HL, Clemens J, Datta SK, John TJ, et al. Vaccination greatly reduces disease, disability, death and inequity worldwide. Bull World Health Organ 2008;86(2):140-6
  4. WHO. Immunization coverage 2020. Available at: https:// www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/immunizationcoverage. Accessed Jan 7, 2021
  5. Smith TC. Vaccine Rejection and Hesitancy: A Review and Call to Action. Open Forum Infect Dis 2017;4(3):ofx146
  6. Phadke VK, Bednarczyk RA, Salmon DA, Omer SB. Association between vaccine refusal and vaccine-preventable diseases in the United States: a review of measles and pertussis. JAMA 2016;315(11):1149-58
  7. Paterson P, Meurice F, Stanberry LR, Glismann S, Rosenthal SL, Larson HJ. Vaccine hesitancy and healthcare providers. Vaccine 2016;34(52):6700-6
  8. Williams JTB, O'Leary ST, Nussbaum AM. Caring for the vaccine- hesitant family: evidence-based alternatives to dismissal. J Pediatr 2020;224:137-40
  9. Marcu A, Rubinstein H, Michie S, Yardley L. Accounting for personal and professional choices for pandemic influenza vaccination amongst English healthcare workers. Vaccine 2015;33(19):2267-72
  10. Abid K, Bari YA, Younas M, Tahir Javaid S, Imran A. Progress of COVID-19 epidemic in Pakistan. Asia Pac J Public Health 2020;32(4):154-6
  11. Zhang YN, Chen Y, Wang Y, Li F, Pender M, Wang N, et al. Reduction in healthcare services during the COVID-19 pandemic in China. BMJ Glob Health 2020;5(11):e003421
  12. Saatçı E. COVID-19 Pandemic and health professionals: Keep them alive or survive? Turkish J Fam Pract 2020;24(3):153–66. 13. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M. The StrengthGening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: uildelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol 2008;61:344–9
  13. Wikipedia. Erzurum; 2020. Available at: https://en.wikipedia. org/wiki/Erzurum. Accessed Nov 28, 2020
  14. WHO. Immunization, vaccines and biologicals—Improving vaccine demand and addressing hesitancy. Geneva: WHO; 2019
  15. McAteer J, Yildirim I, Chahroudi A. The VACCINES Act: Deci phering vaccine hesitancy in the time of COVID-19. Clin Infect Dis 2020;71(15):703-5