SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 80

EXAMINATION OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PERSONALITY TRAITS AND VOCATIONAL INTERESTS: IN A SAMPLE OF THE UK UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS

Ufuk BARMANPEK
Catherine STEELE
Pages
1997–2008
Publication Date
2021-10-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Limitations, implications and further studies are discussed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The main purpose of this study is to explore the relationship between personality traits (“dark” (i.e.
📊
Key Findings & Data:RIASEC) in individualist (UK) culture (Hofstede, 1991; Schwartz, 2006), achieved by considering Individualism-Collectivism (I-C) Theory within a group of undergraduate samples in the UK.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Limitations, implications and further studies are discussed.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2006 Verileri
⚙️Variables:HEXACO · Karanlık Üçlü Kişilik Tipleri · RIASEC Mesleki İlgiler

Abstract

The main purpose of this study is to explore the relationship between personality traits (“dark” (i.e. Dark Triad) and “bright” (i.e. HEXACO)) and vocational interests (i.e. RIASEC) in individualist (UK) culture (Hofstede, 1991; Schwartz, 2006), achieved by considering Individualism-Collectivism (I-C) Theory within a group of undergraduate samples in the UK. The participants were 445 individualist undergraduate students. The results provide suggestions: Apart from other relations, Extraversion (part of ‘bright’ side) and Dark Triad personality traits are positively, while Honesty-humility (part of ‘bright’ side) is negatively related with Enterprising, suggesting that these could be considered together when examining the relationship between personality and vocational interests. Limitations, implications and further studies are discussed.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın temel amacı, bireyci (BK) kültürde kişilik özellikleri (“karanlık” (yani Karanlık Üçlü) ve “parlak” (yani HEXACO)) ile mesleki ilgi alanları (yani RIASEC) arasındaki ilişkiyi araştırmaktır (Hofstede, 1991; Schwartz, 2006), Birleşik Krallık'taki bir grup lisans örneği içinde Bireycilik-Kolektivizm (IC) Teorisini dikkate alarak elde edildi. Katılımcılar 445 bireyci lisans öğrencisiydi. Sonuçlar öneriler sunar: Diğer ilişkilerin yanı sıra Dışadönüklük ('parlak' tarafın bir parçası) ve Karanlık Üçlü kişilik özellikleri olumlu, Dürüstlük-alçakgönüllülük ('parlak' tarafın bir parçası) ise Girişimcilik ile olumsuz yönde ilişkilidir ve bunların olabileceğini düşündürür kişilik ve mesleki çıkarlar arasındaki ilişkiyi incelerken birlikte ele alınır. Sınırlamalar, çıkarımlar ve daha ileri çalışmalar tartışılmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

BARMANPEK, U., STEELE, C. (2021). EXAMINATION OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PERSONALITY TRAITS AND VOCATIONAL INTERESTS: IN A SAMPLE OF THE UK UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 80, 1997–2008. https://ajindex.com/articles/402947

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Babiak, P. (1995). When psychopaths go to work: A case study of an industrial psychopath. Applied Psychology, 44(2), 171-188.
  2. Burr, V. (1995). An introduction to social constructionism. London, England: Routledge. De Bruin, G.P. (2002). The relationship between personality traits and vocational interests. Journal of Industrial Psychology, 28(1), 49-52.
  3. Caldwell-Harris, C.L., & Aycicegi, A. (2006). When personality and culture clash: The psychological distress of allocentrics in an individualist culture and idiocentrics in a collectivist culture. Transcultural Psychiatry, 43, 331-361.
  4. Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81-105.
  5. Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281–302.
  6. Donnellan, M. B., Oswald, F. L., Baird, B. M., & Lucas, R. E. (2006). The Mini-IPIP Scales: Tiny-yet-effective measures of the Big Five Factors of Personality. Psychological Assessment, 18(2), 192-203.
  7. Dumont, L. (1986). Essays on individualism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  8. Fan, W., Cheung, F. M., Leong, F. L., & Cheung, S. F. (2012). Personality traits, vocational interests, and career exploration: A cross‐cultural comparison between American and Hong Kong students. Journal of Career Assessment, 20, 105–119.
  9. Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An Alternative “Description of Personality”: The Big-Five Factor Structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216-1229.
  10. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. London, UK: McGraw-Hill. Holtrop, D., Born, M. P., & De Vries, R. E. (2015). Relating the Spherical representation of vocational interests to the HEXACO personality model. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 89, 10-20.
  11. Hsu, F. L. K. (1960). Rugged individualism reconsidered. Colorado Review, 9, 143–62.
  12. Hui, C. H., & Triandis, H. C. (1986). Individualism–collectivism: A study of cross-cultural researchers. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 17, 225–248.
  13. Jonason, P.K., & Webster, G.D. (2012). A protean approach to social influence: Dark Triad Personalities and Social Influence Tactics. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 521-526.
  14. Jonason, P. K., Wee, S., Li, N. P., & Jackson, C. (2014). Occupational niches and the Dark Triad traits. Personali