Journals / Türk Dermatoloji Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 3

Where are We in Cosmetics and Esthetics Practices in Educational Clinics in Turkey?

Pages
95–98
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusions: Both theoretical and practical education must be given in educational clinics, and theinfrastructure must be created, and the educational schedule must be standardized.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Cosmetic dermatology has recently gained importance with the recent increase in demand.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Results: At least one cosmetic procedure was found to be performed in 69% of the clinics that participated in the study (n = 55),and no cosmetic procedure was performed in 31% of the clinics.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusions: Both theoretical and practical education must be given in educational clinics, and theinfrastructure must be created, and the educational schedule must be standardized.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: Cosmetic dermatology has recently gained importance with the recent increase in demand. The aim of this study is to identifycosmetic dermatology training in Turkey and to assess instructors’ attitudes toward cosmetic dermatology training during residency and currentcosmetic dermatology practices. Methods: This is a cross‑sectional questionnaire study conducted with instructors to investigate the practice ofcosmetics dermatology, the technical equipments, number of patients, and their ideas in the clinics that provide dermatology specialty educationin Turkey. Results: At least one cosmetic procedure was found to be performed in 69% of the clinics that participated in the study (n = 55),and no cosmetic procedure was performed in 31% of the clinics. The mean number of application was 13.2 ± 12.3 weekly in the clinics thatperformed cosmetics procedure. The most common procedures were botulinum toxin injection with 63.6% (n = 35), chemical peeling with60% (n = 33), and platelet‑rich plasma with 60% (n = 33), respectively. The most common laser application was neodymium‑doped yttriumaluminum garnet (28/55). The mean time spent for cosmetic procedures was 1–5 h weekly in the clinics which performed cosmetic procedures.Seventy‑six percent (n = 42) of the participants felt inadequate for performing cosmetics procedures, and 95% (n = 52) reported that cosmeticdermatology education was required. Conclusions: Both theoretical and practical education must be given in educational clinics, and theinfrastructure must be created, and the educational schedule must be standardized.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZKUR, E., KAYNAK, E., GÜREL, M. S. (2019). Where are We in Cosmetics and Esthetics Practices in Educational Clinics in Turkey?. Türk Dermatoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 3, 95–98. https://ajindex.com/articles/402222

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Landthaler M, Ulrich H, Hohenleutner S, Wimmershoff M, Hohenleutner U. Role of laser therapy in dermatology – Clinical aspects. Dermatology 2004;208:129‑34
  2. Cengiz FP, Kemeriz F, Emiroglu N, Meydan MC. Dermatology Residents’ Opinions: Problems and Proposals of Their Solutions in Residency Training. Turk J Dermatol 2014;8:88
  3. Melo DF, de Mattos Barreto T, Plata GT, Araujo LR, Tortelly VD. Excellent response to mesotherapy as adjunctive treatment in male androgenetic alopecia. J Cosmet Dermatol 2019. doi: doi.org/10.1111/ jocd.12983
  4. Saadawi AN, Esawy AM, Kandeel AH, El‑Sayed W. Microneedling by dermapen and glycolic acid peel for the treatment of acne scars: Comparative study. J Cosmet Dermatol 2019;18:107‑14
  5. Ibrahimi OA, Bangash H, Green L, Alam M, Armstrong AW, Eisen DB. Perceptions of expertise in cutaneous surgery and cosmetic procedures: What primary care physicians think. Dermatol Surg 2012;38:1645‑51
  6. Savk E. Avrupa’da Dermatoveneroloji egitimi/dermatovenereology training in Europe. Turk Dermatol Derg 2012;6:123
  7. Yılmaz S, Akkaya VB. Problems and Proposals of Their Solutions in Dermatology Residency Training: A Survey of Residents’ Opinions in Turkey. Arch Turk Dermatol Venerol Turk 2009;43:1
  8. Freiman A, Barzilai DA, Barankin B, Natsheh A, Shear NH. National appraisal of dermatology residency training: A Canadian study. Arch Dermatol 2005;141:1100‑4
  9. Kiafar B, Nahidi Y, Morovatdar N, Maleki M, Teimoorian M, Ghazvini K, et al. A national survey: Desire of dermatology residents to train in cosmetic dermatology and its association with learning medical dermatology. Acta Med Iran 2018;56:591‑7
  10. Schleichert R, Hostetler SG, Zirwas M. The perceived influence of cosmetic dermatology on dermatology resident education. J Am Acad Dermatol 2010;63:352‑3
  11. Duffy D, Torok H, Keeling J, Rendon MI. Surveying cosmetic procedural residency training: Are we short‑changing tomorrow’s dermatologists? A preliminary report. Cosmet Dermatol Cedar Knolls 2008;21:506‑11
  12. Kirby JS, Adgerson CN, Anderson BE. A survey of dermatology resident education in cosmetic procedures. J Am Acad Dermatol 2013;68:e23‑8
  13. Champlain A, Reserva J, Webb K, Griffin D, Moy L, Joyce C, et al. Cosmetic dermatology training during residency: Outcomes of a resident‑reported survey. Dermatol Surg 2018;44:1216‑9
  14. Group A, Philips R, Kelly E. Cosmetic dermatology training in residency: Results of a survey from the residents’ perspective. Dermatol Surg 2012;