SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon / 2016 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 1

YUTMA YAŞAM KALİTESİ ANKETİ'NİN TÜRKÇE VERSİYONUNUN GÜVENİRLİK VE GEÇERLİLİĞİ ARAŞTIRMA MAKALESİ

RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF THE TURKISH VERSION OF THE SWALLOW QUALITY OF LIFE QUESTIONNAIRE

NUMAN DEMİR
SELEN SEREL ARSLAN
ÖZGÜ İNAL
Nezahat Özgül ÜNLÜER
AYNUR AYŞE KARADUMAN
Pages
19–24
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study will contribute to solve the problem about the lack of a scale to measure the dysphagia specific quality of life in Turkey.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: The purpose of this study was to translate the Swallow Quality of Life Questionnaire (SWAL-QOL) into Turkish and to test its reliability and validity among patients with neurogenic swallowing disorders.Methods: One hundred and five patients (mean age= 57±15.4 years, mean weight= 69.5±16.3 kg, mean height=162.8±22.4 cm) completed the Turkish version of the SWAL-QOL (T-SWAL-QOL) and short form of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Questionnaire (WHO QOL-BREF).
📊
Key Findings & Data:The correlation between T-SWAL-QOL and WHO-QOL-BREF was calculated to evaluate criterion validity.Results: The internal consistency of T-SWAL-QOL was found to be high with 0.88 Cronbach's alpha value for test and 0.91 Cronbach's alpha value for retest.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study will contribute to solve the problem about the lack of a scale to measure the dysphagia specific quality of life in Turkey.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to translate the Swallow Quality of Life Questionnaire (SWAL-QOL) into Turkish and to test its reliability and validity among patients with neurogenic swallowing disorders.Methods: One hundred and five patients (mean age= 57±15.4 years, mean weight= 69.5±16.3 kg, mean height=162.8±22.4 cm) completed the Turkish version of the SWAL-QOL (T-SWAL-QOL) and short form of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Questionnaire (WHO QOL-BREF). The internal consistency, test-retest reliability and criterion validity of T-SWAL-QOL as psychometric analysis were explored. Reliability was estimated using tests of internal consistency and test-retest reliability. The correlation between T-SWAL-QOL and WHO-QOL-BREF was calculated to evaluate criterion validity.Results: The internal consistency of T-SWAL-QOL was found to be high with 0.88 Cronbach's alpha value for test and 0.91 Cronbach's alpha value for retest. General burden, eating duration, eating desire and social subscales were found to have good test-retest reliability (r=0.696, r=0.790, r=0.787, r=0786, p<0.001; respectively) and, food selection, fear of eating, sleep, fatigue, communication and mental health were found to have excellent test-retest reliability (r=0.832, r=0.833, r=0.841, r=0.839, r=0.883, r=0.847, p<0.001; respectively). A weak/moderate correlation was found between the T-SWAL-QOL and WHO-QOL-BREF (p<0.05).Discussion: The T-SWAL-QOL was shown to be a valid and reliable questionnaire in dysphagia evaluation. This study will contribute to solve the problem about the lack of a scale to measure the dysphagia specific quality of life in Turkey.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı; Yutma Yaşam Kalitesi Anketi (SWAL-QOL)'nin Türkçe'ye çevrilmesi ve nörojenik yutma güçlüğü olan hastalar arasında güvenirlik ve geçerliliğinin test edilmesidir.Yöntemler: Yüz beş hasta (ortalama yaş= 57±15.4 yıl, ortalama ağırlık= 69.5±16.3 kg, ortalama boy=162.8±22.4 cm) SWAL-QOL'ın Türkçe versiyonu (T-SWAL-QOL) ve World Health Organization Quality of Life Questionnaire (WHO QOL-BREF)'ın kısa formunu tamamladı. T-SWAL-QOL'ın iç tutarlılığı, test-tekrar test güvenirliği ve kriter geçerliliği psikometrik analizler olarak araştırıldı. Güvenirlik; iç tutarlılık ve test-tekrar test güvenilirliği testleri kullanılarak değerlendirildi. Kriter geçerliliği değerlendirmek için T-SWAL-QOL ve WHO-QOL-BREF arasındaki korelasyon hesaplandı.Sonuçlar: T-SWAL-QOL'in iç tutarlılığı test için Cronbach's alpha değeri 0.88, tekrar test için 0.91 olmak üzere yüksek bulundu. Genel yakınma, yeme zamanı, yeme isteği ve sosyal alt başlıklarının test-tekrar test güvenirliği iyi (sırasıyla; r=0.696, r=0.790, r=0.787, r=0786, p<0.001) ve besin seçimi, yeme korkusu, uyku, yorgunluk, iletişim ve mental sağlık test-tekrar test güvenirliği mükemmel bulundu (sırasıyla; r=0.832, r=0.833, r=0.841, r=0.839, r=0.883, r=0.847, p<0.001). T-SWAL-QOL ve WHO-QOL-BREF arasında zayıf/orta düzeyde korelasyon bulundu (p<0.05).Tartışma: T-SWAL-QOL'in disfaji değerlendirmesinde geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçek olduğu gösterildi. Bu çalışma; Türkiye'de disfajiye özel yaşam kalitesini değerlendiren ölçek eksikliği ile ilgili problemin çözümüne katkı sağladı.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİR, N., ARSLAN, S. S., İNAL, Ö., ÜNLÜER, N. Ö., KARADUMAN, A. A. (2016). YUTMA YAŞAM KALİTESİ ANKETİ'NİN TÜRKÇE VERSİYONUNUN GÜVENİRLİK VE GEÇERLİLİĞİ ARAŞTIRMA MAKALESİ. Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 1, 19–24. https://ajindex.com/articles/402122

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Gotay CC, Moore TD. Assessing quality of life in head and neck cancer. Qual Life Res. 1992;1(1):5-17. Davis LA. Quality of life issues related to dysphagia. Top Geriatr Rehabil. 2007;23(4):352-65.
  2. Chen AY, Frankowski R, Bishop-Leone J, Hebert T, Leyk S, Lewin J, et al. The development and validation of a dysphagia-specific quality of life questionnaire for patients with head and neck cancer: the M.D. Anderson dysphagia inventory. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001;127(7):870-6.
  3. Wallace KL, Middleton S, Cook IJ. Development and validation of a self-report symptom inventory to assess the severity of oralpharyngeal dysphagia. Gastroenterology. 2000;118(4):678-87.
  4. Rosen CA, Lee AS, Osbome J, Zullo T, Murry T. Development and validation of the Voice Handicap Index-10. Laryngoscope. 2004;114(9):1549-56.
  5. Belafsky PC, Mouadeb DA, Rees CJ, Pryor JC, Postma GN, Allen J, et al. Validity and reliability of the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT- 10). Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2008;117(12):919-24.
  6. McHorney CA, Bricker DE, Robbins J, Kramer AE, Rosenbek JC, Chignell KA. The SWAL-QOL outcomes tool for oropharyngeal dysphagia in adults: II. Item reduction and preliminary scaling. Dysphagia.2000;15(3):122-33.
  7. McHorney CA, Robbins J, Lomax K, Rosenbek JC, Chignell KA, Kramer AE, et al. The SWAL-QOL outcomes tool for oropharyngeal dysphagia in adults: III. Documentation of reliability and validity. Dysphagia. 2002;17(2):97-114.
  8. Roe JW, Leslie P, Drinnan MJ. Oropharyngeal dysphagia: the experience of patients with non-head and neck cancers receiving specialist palliative care. Palliat Med. 2007;21(7):567-74.
  9. Khaldoun E, Woisard V, Verin E. Validation in French of the SWAL-QOL scale in patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia. Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2009;33(3):167-71.
  10. Bogaardt HC, Speyer R, Baijens LW, Fokkens WJ. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Dutch version of SWAL-QOL. Dysphagia. 2009;24(1):66-70.
  11. Lam PM, Lai CK. The validation of the Chinese version of the Swallow Quality-of-Life questionnaire (SWAL-QOL) using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Dysphagia. 2011;26(2):117-24.
  12. Finizia C, Rudberg I, Bergqvist H, Ryden A. A cross-sectional validation study of the Swedish version of SWAL-QOL. Dysphagia. 2012;27(3):325-35.
  13. Eser E, Fidaner H, Fidaner C, Yalçın Eser S, Elbi H, Göker E. WHOQOL -100 ve WHOQOL-Bref 'in psikometrik özellikleri. 3P Dergisi. 1999;7:23-40.
  14. Hayran M, Hayran M. Sağlık araştırmaları için temel istatistik. 1st ed. Ankara Omega Araştırma L