Journals / Türkiye'de Lösemi Lenfoma Miyelom Araştırmaları / 2020 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 4

5 Years Single Center Retrospective Evaluation of Our Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/ Lymphoma

Kronik Lenfositik Lösemi/Lenfoma Hastalarımızın Tek Merkezli 5 Yıllık Retrospektif Değerlendirmesi

Pages
71–78
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Treatment responses, survival status, factors effecting overall survival (OS) were evaluated retrospectively.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Chronic Lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is a hematologic malignancy that is characterized by mature-appearing small lymphocytes in peripheral blood, bone marrow and lymphoid tissues.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Patients and Methods: In our study 216 patients diagnosed with CLL in the hematology clinic of İzmir Katip Çelebi Atatürk Training and Research Hospital between January 2015-December 2019 with available data were included.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Treatment responses, survival status, factors effecting overall survival (OS) were evaluated retrospectively.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Chronic Lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is a hematologic malignancy that is characterized by mature-appearing small lymphocytes in peripheral blood, bone marrow and lymphoid tissues. The aim of this study was to evaluate the general clinical and prognostic features, treatment regimens, response to treatment, clinical and laboratory markers of patients with CLL diagnosed in our center in order to contribute to approach algorithms for patients. Patients and Methods: In our study 216 patients diagnosed with CLL in the hematology clinic of İzmir Katip Çelebi Atatürk Training and Research Hospital between January 2015-December 2019 with available data were included. Treatment responses, survival status, factors effecting overall survival (OS) were evaluated retrospectively. Results: Of the 216 patients included in the study, 125 were male (57.9%), 91 were female (42.1%), and the median age was 68 ± 10 (37- 91). As a result of our study, shorter survival was observed in the group with high lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) at the time of diagnosis (p= 0.05). During the follow-up, 156 patients (72.3%) did not receive any treatment, while 60 patients (27.7%) received treatment. Considering the survival status of patients according to RAI stages, patients with advanced stage (RAI 3-4) were found to have short survival and it was found statistically significant (p= 0.015). Five-year OS was 86%, progression-free survival was 61%. Conclusion: When patients with CLL with wait and watch protocol necessitate treatment, they should carefully evaluated for choosing the optimal therapy with proper staging and correctly determined prognostic status with cytogenetic and fluorescent insitu hybridization (FISH). For patients who can tolerate complete remission targeted therapy, appropriate and effective chemoimmunotherapy should be started at the right time.

Özet

Amaç: Kronik Lenfositik Lösemi (KLL) olgun görünümlü küçük lenfositlerin periferik kan, kemikiliği ve lenfoid dokularda anormal artışıyla karakterize hematolojik bir malignitedir. Bu çalışmaile merkezimizde takip ve tedavi edilmiş KLL tanılı hastaların genel klinik özelliklerini, prognostiközelliklerini, kullanılan tedavi rejimlerini, tedavi yanıtlarını, sağkalıma etkisi olabilecek klinik velaboratuvar belirteçlerini saptayarak hasta yaklaşım algoritmalarına katkı sağlamayı amaçladık.Hastalar ve Yöntem: Çalışmamıza Ocak 2015-Aralık 2019 tarihleri arasında İzmir Katip ÇelebiAtatürk Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi hematoloji kliniğinde KLL tanısı alan ve verilerine ulaşılabilen 216 hasta alındı. Tedavi yanıtları, sağkalım durumu ve toplam sağkalım (OS) üzerine etkieden faktörler retrospektif olarak değerlendirildi.Bulgular: Çalışmaya alınan 216 hastanın 125’i erkek (% 57.9), 91’ i kadın (% 42.1) olup, medyanyaş 68 ± 10 (37-91) idi. Çalışmamız neticesinde tanı anında laktat dehidrogenaz (LDH) seviyesiyüksek olan grupta daha kısa sağkalım gözlendi (p= 0.05). İzlem süresince 156 hasta (% 72.3) hiçtedavi almazken, 60 hasta (%27.7) tedavi aldı. Hastaların RAI evrelerine göre sağkalım durumlarına bakıldığında ileri evre (RAI 3-4) olan hastaların sağkalımlarının daha düşük olduğu görüldüve istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bulundu (p= 0.015). Beş yıllık toplam sağkalım %86, progresyonsuzsağkalım %61’di.Sonuç: Uzun süre takipte izlenebilen KLL tanılı hastaların tedavi ihtiyacı doğduğunda doğruevreleme yapılmalı, sitogenetik ve floresan insitu hibridizasyon (FISH) değerlendirme ile prognostik durum doğru belirlenerek, hastalar için en uygun tedavi ajanları belirlenmelidir. Tamremisyon hedefli tedaviyi tolere edebilecek hastalar için uygun ve etkin kemo-immunoterapiajanlarına doğru zamanda başlanılmalıdır.

🔖

Cite This Article

SEREL, Y. E., SEREL, A., ÇETİNTEPE, T., KİPER, D., SUBAŞIOĞLU, A., MEDENİ, Ş. S., PAYZIN, K. B. (2020). 5 Years Single Center Retrospective Evaluation of Our Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/ Lymphoma. Türkiye'de Lösemi Lenfoma Miyelom Araştırmaları, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 4, 71–78. https://ajindex.com/articles/402033

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Demir V, Kahraman S, Katgı A, Pişkin Ö, Özsan GH, Demirkan F, et al. Kronik lenfositik lösemi hastalarının genel klinik değerlendirilmesi. DEÜ Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi 2012;26(1):9-19
  2. National Cancer Institute: Survilance, Epidemiology, and End Result program. SEER Stat Fact Sheets: Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL). Erişim tarihi: 01.07.2016 Erişim adresi: http://seer. cancer.gov/statfacts/html/clyl.html
  3. Kalil N, Cheson BD. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Oncologist 1999;4:352-69
  4. Kipps TJ. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia and related diseases. William Hematol 1995;1017-39
  5. Mauro FR, Foa R, Ceretti R, Coluzzi S, Mandelli F, Girelli G. Autoimmune hemolytic anemia in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: clinical, therapeutic and prognostic features. Blood 2000;95:2786-92
  6. Dighiero G. An attempt to explain disordered immunity and hypogammaglobulinemia in BCLL. Nouv Rev Fr Hematol 1988;30(5-6):283-8
  7. Rai KR, Sawitsky A, Cronkite EP. Clinical staging of chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood 1975;46:219-34
  8. Binet JL, Auguier A, Dighiero G, Chastang C, Piguet H, Goasyen J, et al. A new prognostic classification of chronic lymphocytic leukemia derived from a multivariate survival analysis. Cancer 1981;198-206
  9. Montserrat E. New prognostic markers in CLL. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 2006:279-84
  10. Thomas R, Ribeiro I, Shepherd P, Johnson P, Cook M, Lakhani A, et al. Spontaneous clinical regression in chronic lymphocyticleukaemia. Br J Haematol 2002:116(2):341-5
  11. Mauro FR, Foa R, Giannarelli D, Cordone I, Crescenzi S, Pescarmona E, et al. Clinical characteristics and outcome of young chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients: a single institution study of 204 cases. Blood 1999;94(2):448-54
  12. Pangalis GA, Boussiotis VA, Kittas C. B-chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Disease progression in 150 untreated stage A and B patients as predicted by bone marrow pattern. Nouv Rev Fr Hematol 1988:30(5-6);373-5
  13. Rosenquist R, Cortese D, Bhoi S. Prognostic markers and their clinical applicability in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: where do we stand? Leukemia Lymphoma 2013;54(11):2351-64
  14. Hallek M, Cheson BD, Catovsky D. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic lymphoid leukemia. Blood 2008;111:5446-56
  15. Pamuk ON, Pamuk GE, Soysal T, Ongören S, Başlar Z, Ferhanoğlu B, et al. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia in Turkey: experience of a single center in Istanbul. South Med J 2004:97;240-5
  16. Pamuk GE, Pamuk ON, Soysal T, Ongören S, Başlar Z