Journals / İzmir Dr. Behçet Uz Çocuk Hastanesi Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 3

Somatic Growth Features of Moderate-Late and Early Preterm Infants at Early Childhood

Pages
226–232
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: The moderate-late and early preterm infants had similar growth features in terms of weight, height, and target height when evaluated at 42 months of age.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the physical growth features of preterms infants at early childhood and to evaluate the perinatal and postnatal risk factors that affect growth.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Method: Somatic growth features including weight, height, and target height, of moderate-late and early preterm infants followed-up in our unit were evaluated at a mean age of 42 months.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: The moderate-late and early preterm infants had similar growth features in terms of weight, height, and target height when evaluated at 42 months of age.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the physical growth features of preterms infants at early childhood and to evaluate the perinatal and postnatal risk factors that affect growth. Method: Somatic growth features including weight, height, and target height, of moderate-late and early preterm infants followed-up in our unit were evaluated at a mean age of 42 months. The effects of intrauterine growth characteristics (IUGC) on current growth as well as the effects of perinatal and early neonatal problems were investigated. Results: A total of 232 moderate-late preterm infants (Group I) (mean gestational age [GA]: 34.9±1.2 weeks) and 112 early preterms (Group II) (mean GA: 29.9±1.6 weeks) were evaluated. The ratio of retardation in height was 2.6 % and 6.3% in Group I and Group II, respectively. The rate of failure in achieving the target height was higher in Group II (3.9% vs 8%). Growth differences in terms of height and weight were not significantly different between the two groups (p>0.05). Severe intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), hydrocephalus and invasive mechanical ventilation requirements negatively affected the growth in height and reaching the target height (p<0.05). Conclusion: The moderate-late and early preterm infants had similar growth features in terms of weight, height, and target height when evaluated at 42 months of age.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKAR, S., KAVUNCUOĞLU, S., AKIN, M. A., ALDEMİR, E. Y., DEMİRHAN, A. (2021). Somatic Growth Features of Moderate-Late and Early Preterm Infants at Early Childhood. İzmir Dr. Behçet Uz Çocuk Hastanesi Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 3, 226–232. https://ajindex.com/articles/401430

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Raju TN, Higgins RD, Stark AR, Leveno KJ. Optimizing care and outcome for late-preterm (near-term) infants: a summary of the workshop sponsored by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Pediatrics. 2006;118(3):1207-14.
  2. Boyle EM, Johnson S, Manktelow B, et al. Neonatal outcomes and delivery of care for infants born late preterm or moderately preterm: a prospective population-based study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2015;100(6):F479‐F85.
  3. Kalyoncu O, Aygün C, Cetinoğlu E, Küçüködük S. Neonatal morbidity and mortality of late-preterm babies. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010;23(7):607‐12.
  4. Ananth CV, Friedman AM, Gyamfi-Bannerman C. Epidemiology of moderate preterm, late preterm and early term delivery. Clin Perinatol. 2013;40(4):601‐10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clp.2013.07.001 5. de Jong M, Verhoeven M, Lasham CA, Meijssen CB, van Baar AL. Behaviour and development in 24-month-old moderately preterm toddlers. Arch Dis Child. 2015;100(6):548‐53.
  5. Johnson S, Evans TA, Draper ES, et al. Neurodevelopmental outcomes following late and moderate prematurity: a population-based cohort study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2015;100(4):F301‐F8.
  6. Woythaler MA, McCormick MC, Smith VC. Late preterm infants have worse 24-month neurodevelopmental outcomes than term infants. Pediatrics. 2011;127(3):e622‐e9.
  7. Niklasson A, Engstrom E, Hard AL, Wikland KA, Hellstrom A. Growth in very preterm children: a longitudinal study. Pediatr Res. 2003;54(6):899‐905.
  8. Yeşinel S, Aldemir EY, Kavuncuoğlu S, Yeşinel S, Yıldız H. Evaluation of growth in very Low birth weight preterm babies. Turk Pediatri Ars. 2014;49(4):289‐98. Published 2014 Dec 1.
  9. Sütçüoğlu S, Dikerler A, Halıcıoğlu O, Akkaya M, Öztürk C, Akman S, Özer E. Neurodevelopmental follow-up results in very low birth weight premature infants and influential factors. Behcet Uz Cocuk Hast Derg. 2012;2(2):94-101.
  10. Koç Ö, Kavuncuoğlu S, Ramoğlu MG, Aldemir E, Aktalay A, Eras Z. School Performance and Neurodevelopment of Very Low Birth Weight Preterm Infants: First Report From Turkey. J Child