Journals / Retina-Vitreus / 2021 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 4

Intraocular Tamponade use in Pars Plana Vitrectomy Combined with Sutureless Intrascleral Lens Implantation

Pages
387–393
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: 23G PPV with silicone or C3F8 tamponade can be performed simultaneously with 27G needle-assisted sutureless intrascleral lens implantation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: To evaluate the effect of intraocular tamponade use on anatomic and functional results and complications in pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) performed simultaneously with sutureless intrascleral lens implantation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Group-1 included patients who underwent 23G PPV with simultaneous 27G needle-assisted sutureless three-piece intrascleral lens implantation and intraocular silicone tamponade.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: 23G PPV with silicone or C3F8 tamponade can be performed simultaneously with 27G needle-assisted sutureless intrascleral lens implantation.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of intraocular tamponade use on anatomic and functional results and complications in pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) performed simultaneously with sutureless intrascleral lens implantation. Methods: Patients were divided into two groups according to the type of tamponade used in surgery. Group-1 included patients who underwent 23G PPV with simultaneous 27G needle-assisted sutureless three-piece intrascleral lens implantation and intraocular silicone tamponade. Group-2 included patients who underwent 23G PPV with simultaneous 27G needle-assisted sutureless three-piece intrascleral lens implantation and intraocular C3F8 tamponade. Best corrected visual acuities (BCVA), centralization and stabilization of the intraocular lens, and complications were compared between the two groups. Results: 15 eyes of 15 patients were included in Group-1, and 14 eyes of 14 patients in Group-2. Preoperative BCVA of Group-1 was 1.82 logMAR, and signifi cantly increased to 0.71 logMAR at the 6th month (p = 0.022). Preoperative BCVA of Group-2 was 1.92 logMAR, and signifi cantly increased to 0.67 logMAR at the 6th month (p = 0.029). There was no signifi cant difference between the visual acuities of both groups at 6 months (p = 0.09). At sixth month, intraocular lens in both groups was centralized and stabilized in biomicroscopic examination and cycloplegic refraction. The most common early complication was increased intraocular pressure, and developed in 4 (26.6%) patients in Group-1 and 3 (21.4%) patients in Group-2. Conclusion: 23G PPV with silicone or C3F8 tamponade can be performed simultaneously with 27G needle-assisted sutureless intrascleral lens implantation.

🔖

Cite This Article

LİMON, U., AKÇAY, B. İ. (2021). Intraocular Tamponade use in Pars Plana Vitrectomy Combined with Sutureless Intrascleral Lens Implantation. Retina-Vitreus, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 4, 387–393. https://ajindex.com/articles/400353

References (14)

  1. Kumar DA, Agarwal A, Prakash G, et al. Evaluation of intraocular lens tilt with anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol 2011;151:406–418
  2. Kwong YYY, Yuen HKL, Lam RF, et al. Comparison of outcomes of primary scleral-fi xated versus primary anterior chamber intraocular lens implantation in complicated cataract surgeries. Ophthalmology 2007; 114:80–85
  3. Gonnermann J, Klamann MKJ, Maier A-K, et al. Visual outcome and complications after posterior irisclaw aphakic intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg 2012; 38: 2139–2143
  4. Helvaci S, Demirduzen S, Oksuz H. Iris-claw intraocular lens implantation: anterior chamber versus retropupillary implantation. Indian J Ophthalmol 2016; 64: 45–49
  5. Wasiluk E, Krasnicki P, Dmuchowska DA, et al. The implantation of the scleralfi xated posterior chamber intraocular lens with 9/0 polypropylene sutures –long-term visual outcomes and complications. Adv Med Sci 2019; 64:100–103
  6. Khan MA, Gupta OP, Smith RG, et al. Scleral fi xation of intraocular lenses using Gore-Tex suture: clinical outcomes and safety profi le. Br J Ophthalmol 2016; 100:638–643
  7. Pavlidis M, de Ortueta D, Scharioth GB. Bioptics in sutureless intrascleral multifocal posterior chamber intraocular lens fi xation. J Refract Surg 2011;27:386–388
  8. Kumar DA, Agarwal A, Jacob S, et al. Use of 23-gauge or 25-gauge trocar cannula for globe maintenance in glued intraocular lens surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 2010; 36:690–691
  9. Kumar DA, Agarwal A, Jacob S, et al. Repositioning of the dislocated intraocular lens with sutureless 20-gauge vitrectomy. Retina 2010; 30:682–687
  10. Yüksel K, Pekel G, Alagöz N, et al. Silicone oil barrier sutures in aphakic eyes with iris defects. Retina 2016; 366:1222-1228 11. Mizuno Y, Sugimoto Y. A comparative study of transscleral suture-fi xated and scleral-fi xated intraocular lens implantation. Int Ophthalmol 2019; 39:839–845
  11. Kronschla¨ ger M, Bluin S, Roschger P, et al. Attaining the optimal fl ange for intrascleral intraocular lens fi xation. J Cataract Refract Surg 2018; 44:1303–1305
  12. Scharioth GB, Prasad S, Georgalas I, et al. Intermediate results of sutureless intrascleral posterior chamber intraocular lens fi xation. J Cataract Refract Surg 2010; 36:254–259
  13. Yamane S, Inoue M, Arakawa A, et al. Sutureless 27-gauge needle-guided intrascleral intraocular lens implantation with lamellar scleral dissection. Ophthalmology 2014; 121:61–66
  14. Yamane S, Sato S,