Journals / Perinatoloji Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 3

Elective cesarean section on maternal request: ethical and legal considerations

Maternal talep üzerine elektif sezaryen: Etik ve yasal hususlar

Pages
154–156
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The main question to be examined is whether it is ethical to allow women to opt for cesarean delivery in the absence of obstetric indication (i.e. cesarean delivery on maternal request), taking into account the increased risk to the mother and her future offspr

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Cesarean is defined as the delivery of a fetus through surgical incisions made through the uterine wall.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Primary cesarean sections often lead to repeat cesareans, which may lead to placenta accreta spectrum disorders.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The main question to be examined is whether it is ethical to allow women to opt for cesarean delivery in the absence of obstetric indication (i.e. cesarean delivery on maternal request), taking into account the increased risk to the mother and her future offspr
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Cesarean is defined as the delivery of a fetus through surgical incisions made through the uterine wall. Primary cesarean sections often lead to repeat cesareans, which may lead to placenta accreta spectrum disorders. The ethic of exposing mothers to these risks, as well as performing surgery on what is otherwise a healthy patient, become entangled with the demand for patient choice, as well as the increasing financial strain on our healthcare system. The main question to be examined is whether it is ethical to allow women to opt for cesarean delivery in the absence of obstetric indication (i.e. cesarean delivery on maternal request), taking into account the increased risk to the mother and her future offspr

Özet

Sezaryen, uterus duvar›nda yap›lan cerrahi insizyonlar arac›l›¤›yla fetüsün do¤urtulmas› olarak tan›mlanmaktad›r. Primer sezaryen operasyonlar› genellikle tekrarlayan sezaryenlere sebep olmakta ve bu da plasenta akreta spektrum bozukluklar›na yol açabilmektedir. Sa¤l›kl› bir hastan›n üzerinde cerrahi ifllem uygulaman›n yan› s›ra gebeleri bu risklere maruz b›rakma konusundaki etik tutum, sa¤l›k sistemimiz üzerinde artan mali bask›yla beraber hasta tercihine yönelik talep ile daha da karmafl›k hale gelmifltir. Ele al›nacak as›l soru, annenin ve do¤acak bebe¤inin artm›fl riskini dikkate alarak, obstetrik endikasyon yokken gebelerin sezaryen do¤umu seçmesine izin vermenin (ör. maternal talep üzerine sezaryen do¤um) etik olup olmad›¤›d›r.

🔖

Cite This Article

CASELLA, C., CAPASSO, E., BİANCO, C., SACCONE, G., GUİDA, M., GRAZİANO, V., PATERNOSTER, M. (2020). Elective cesarean section on maternal request: ethical and legal considerations. Perinatoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 3, 154–156. https://ajindex.com/articles/400281

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Yearly report on the activity of hospitalization. Data SDO 2018. [Internet]. Rome: General Direction of Health Planning. [2019 June]. Available from: http://www.salute.gov.it/imgs/ C_17_pubblicazioni_2898_allegato.pdf 2. Torloni MR, Betrán AP, Montilla P, Scolaro E, Seuc A, Mazzoni A, et al. Do Italian women prefer cesarean section? Results from a survey on mode of delivery preferences. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2013;13:78. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 3. Maternal & Child Health Research Consortium. Confidential enquity into stillbirths and deaths in infants. 7th Annual Report, 41, London: MCHRC; 2000. 4. Vimercati A, Greco P, Kardashi A, Rossi C, Loizzi V, Scioscia M, et al. Choice of cesarean section and perception of legal pressure. J Perinat Med 2000;28:111–7. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 5. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Surgery and patient choice: the ethics of decision making [ACOG Committee Opinion no 289] Obstet Gynecol 2003; 102:1101–6. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 6. National Collaborating Centre for Women’s and Children’s Health. Caesarean section. Clinical Guideline. April 2004. http://www.csh.org.tw/dr.tcj/Educartion/Guideline/OB%20g uideline/CS1%20Guideline.pdf 7. Lavender T, Hofmeyr GJ, Neilson JP, Kingdon C, Gyte GML. Caesarean section for non-medical reasons at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;2012(3):CD004660. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 8. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). ACOG Committee Opinion No. 761: Cesarean delivery on maternal request. Obstet Gynecol 2019;133:e73– e7. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 9. González-Hernando CRN, García-Alonso MM, Vázquez- Fernández ME, San José-Arribas A, Sanz-Almazán M, Puebla- Nicolás E. Evaluation of a “Mother and Child Healthcare Blog” and post-use satisfaction: a qualitative interview study. International Journal of Nursing 2016;3:1–8. [CrossRef] 10. Nanette PF, Cordero MAW, Munoz AP, Nash D. Collaboration effort between physicians and nurses: a feedback tool for the review of the hospitals. International Journal of Nursing 2017;4:19–26. [CrossRef]